本文選題：悖論 + 本質(zhì)主義��； 參考：《理論月刊》2011年02期

【摘要】：本質(zhì)主義、反本質(zhì)主義與建構(gòu)主義構(gòu)成了本質(zhì)主義思維方式的演進(jìn)模式。如果說(shuō)文學(xué)研究中本質(zhì)主義掩蓋了文學(xué)的本體問(wèn)題,文藝?yán)碚摰谋倔w論反思則建立在悖論邏輯的基礎(chǔ)上,認(rèn)為文學(xué)的本體即悖論,文學(xué)理論必須以悖論性差異為基礎(chǔ)。文學(xué)本質(zhì)構(gòu)成了決定文學(xué)"是其所是"的根本依據(jù),探求文學(xué)活動(dòng)的內(nèi)在規(guī)律、尋找文學(xué)的本質(zhì)屬性則成為了傳統(tǒng)文學(xué)研究的根本任務(wù),而文學(xué)活動(dòng)不過(guò)是這一本質(zhì)規(guī)律的模仿與體現(xiàn),引發(fā)爭(zhēng)論的僅僅是這一本質(zhì)究竟是什么,是客觀的還是主觀的,通過(guò)對(duì)理論的反思與批判以捍衛(wèi)文學(xué)活動(dòng)的自由。
[Abstract]:Essentialism, anti-essentialism and constructivism constitute the evolution mode of thinking mode of essentialism. If essentialism conceals the Noumenon problem of literature in literary research, the ontological reflection of literary theory is based on the logic of paradox, and holds that the ontology of literature is paradox, and the literary theory must be based on paradoxical differences. The essence of literature constitutes the fundamental basis for deciding that literature is what it is. It is the fundamental task of traditional literature research to explore the inherent laws of literary activities and to find the essential attributes of literature. The literary activity is only the imitation and embodiment of this essential law, and it is only what this essence is that is objective or subjective, which can safeguard the freedom of literary activity through the reflection and criticism of the theory.
【作者單位】： 徐州師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 蘇宏斌;;何謂“本體”?——文學(xué)本體論研究中的概念辨析之一[J];東方叢刊;2006年01期

2 大衛(wèi)·L.杰弗里;蔣顯t，

本文編號(hào)：1862086