本文選題：中日無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)詩(shī)歌　切入點(diǎn)：詩(shī)歌理論　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中日無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)詩(shī)歌作為世界無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)文學(xué)的重要組成部分,于20世紀(jì)初至30年代在亞洲掀起了紅色的浪潮,唱出了時(shí)代的最強(qiáng)音。詩(shī)評(píng)家與詩(shī)人在對(duì)無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)詩(shī)歌的理論建設(shè)與創(chuàng)作環(huán)節(jié)中均進(jìn)行了嶄新的嘗試,為中日新詩(shī)的發(fā)展拓寬了道路。盡管中國(guó)無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)詩(shī)歌的發(fā)展帶有不可磨滅的日本烙印,然而中國(guó)詩(shī)人在特殊的歷史環(huán)境下,經(jīng)過(guò)自身不斷的努力使得本國(guó)無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)詩(shī)歌煥發(fā)出絢爛的光彩。 中日現(xiàn)代文學(xué)的關(guān)系問(wèn)題一直以來(lái)受到學(xué)術(shù)界的普遍關(guān)注,而以無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)詩(shī)歌作為切入點(diǎn)不失為一次有益的嘗試,既可以廓清兩者發(fā)展的脈絡(luò),更可以此揭示詩(shī)歌(甚至文學(xué))發(fā)展的一般規(guī)律,梳理導(dǎo)致文學(xué)現(xiàn)象發(fā)生、發(fā)展、沒(méi)落的原因,進(jìn)而為中日無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)文學(xué)研究提供新的視角。 對(duì)中日無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)詩(shī)歌的論述主要從以下幾個(gè)部分展開(kāi)： 第一章主要使用了影響研究的方法,將兩者的形成過(guò)程完整地呈現(xiàn)出來(lái),從外部影響與內(nèi)在發(fā)展兩方面對(duì)其成因進(jìn)行了分析與總結(jié),并評(píng)價(jià)了其積極意義與消極影響,為后面章節(jié)的論述提供了依據(jù)。 第二章與第三章運(yùn)用了平行研究的方法,分別從理論與創(chuàng)作兩個(gè)方面對(duì)中日無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)詩(shī)歌發(fā)展中所呈現(xiàn)出的異同點(diǎn)及其原因進(jìn)了分析。由于兩者理論發(fā)展的脈絡(luò)大致相同,因此,第二章主要就其差異進(jìn)行了論述。同時(shí),由于兩者在創(chuàng)作方面各具特色且發(fā)展的時(shí)間斷線存在差異,所以第三章在此基礎(chǔ)上,從詩(shī)歌創(chuàng)作的內(nèi)容與形式上對(duì)兩者呈現(xiàn)出的共性進(jìn)行了歸納與分析,解釋了二者和而不同的特點(diǎn)。 當(dāng)然,這一論題的外延是十分廣泛的,因此,可選取的研究角度也是多元的,本文從詩(shī)歌角度研究,縱然不能窮其全部,但換一個(gè)視角看問(wèn)題,對(duì)于學(xué)術(shù)研究來(lái)說(shuō)是非常有益的。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the world proletarian literature, Chinese and Japanese proletarian poetry set off a red tide in Asia from the beginning of 20th century to 30s. Poetry critics and poets have made a new attempt in the theoretical construction and creation of proletarian poetry. Although the development of Chinese proletarian poetry has an indelible Japanese brand, Chinese poets are in a special historical environment. Through their own continuous efforts to make our proletarian poetry radiate brilliant brilliance. The relationship between Chinese and Japanese modern literature has always been the subject of widespread concern in academic circles. Taking proletarian poetry as a starting point is a useful attempt to clarify the context of their development. It can also reveal the general law of the development of poetry (or even literature), comb the causes of the occurrence, development and decline of literary phenomena, and then provide a new perspective for the study of proletarian literature in China and Japan. The discussion of proletarian poetry in China and Japan is mainly carried out in the following parts:. The first chapter mainly uses the method of influence research, presents the formation process of both of them completely, analyzes and summarizes the causes of their formation from two aspects of external influence and internal development, and evaluates their positive and negative effects. It provides the basis for the discussion of the following chapters. The second and third chapters use parallel research methods to analyze the similarities and differences in the development of Chinese and Japanese proletarian poetry from the two aspects of theory and creation. Therefore, the second chapter mainly discusses their differences. At the same time, because of the differences of their creative characteristics and the time of development, the third chapter is based on this. This paper sums up and analyzes the generality of the two from the content and form of poetry creation, and explains their characteristics of harmony but difference. Of course, the extension of this thesis is very extensive, therefore, the research angle that can be selected is also diverse. This paper studies from the perspective of poetry, even though it can not be exhaustive, but from another angle of view to see the problem. It is very useful for academic research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I0-03;I106.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉靜;;中國(guó)詩(shī)歌會(huì)創(chuàng)作得失論[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

2 張向東;對(duì)左翼文學(xué)的評(píng)價(jià)和重寫(xiě)文學(xué)史的思考[J];重慶社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年03期

3 林偉民;試論左翼文學(xué)關(guān)于創(chuàng)作方法理論的探索[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年01期

4 程光煒;左翼文學(xué)思潮與現(xiàn)代性[J];海南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年05期

5 陸詠梅;政治文化視角:左翼文學(xué)的政治化傾向[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2003年03期

6 韓雪臨;三十年代初左翼文學(xué)與現(xiàn)實(shí)主義理論[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

7 陳國(guó)恩;“拉普”和中國(guó)左翼文學(xué)批評(píng)的歷史反思[J];重慶三峽學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

8 張同道;火的吶喊與夢(mèng)的呢哺——三十年代的左翼詩(shī)潮與現(xiàn)代主義詩(shī)潮[J];文學(xué)評(píng)論;1997年01期

9 曹清華;“左聯(lián)”成立與左翼身份建構(gòu)——一個(gè)歷史事件的解剖[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2005年03期

10 劉靜;論普羅詩(shī)派[J];西安聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1580726