本文選題：中日無產(chǎn)階級詩歌　切入點：詩歌理論　出處：《西南大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：中日無產(chǎn)階級詩歌作為世界無產(chǎn)階級文學的重要組成部分,于20世紀初至30年代在亞洲掀起了紅色的浪潮,唱出了時代的最強音。詩評家與詩人在對無產(chǎn)階級詩歌的理論建設(shè)與創(chuàng)作環(huán)節(jié)中均進行了嶄新的嘗試,為中日新詩的發(fā)展拓寬了道路。盡管中國無產(chǎn)階級詩歌的發(fā)展帶有不可磨滅的日本烙印,然而中國詩人在特殊的歷史環(huán)境下,經(jīng)過自身不斷的努力使得本國無產(chǎn)階級詩歌煥發(fā)出絢爛的光彩。 中日現(xiàn)代文學的關(guān)系問題一直以來受到學術(shù)界的普遍關(guān)注,而以無產(chǎn)階級詩歌作為切入點不失為一次有益的嘗試,既可以廓清兩者發(fā)展的脈絡(luò),更可以此揭示詩歌(甚至文學)發(fā)展的一般規(guī)律,梳理導致文學現(xiàn)象發(fā)生、發(fā)展、沒落的原因,進而為中日無產(chǎn)階級文學研究提供新的視角。 對中日無產(chǎn)階級詩歌的論述主要從以下幾個部分展開： 第一章主要使用了影響研究的方法,將兩者的形成過程完整地呈現(xiàn)出來,從外部影響與內(nèi)在發(fā)展兩方面對其成因進行了分析與總結(jié),并評價了其積極意義與消極影響,為后面章節(jié)的論述提供了依據(jù)。 第二章與第三章運用了平行研究的方法,分別從理論與創(chuàng)作兩個方面對中日無產(chǎn)階級詩歌發(fā)展中所呈現(xiàn)出的異同點及其原因進了分析。由于兩者理論發(fā)展的脈絡(luò)大致相同,因此,第二章主要就其差異進行了論述。同時,由于兩者在創(chuàng)作方面各具特色且發(fā)展的時間斷線存在差異,所以第三章在此基礎(chǔ)上,從詩歌創(chuàng)作的內(nèi)容與形式上對兩者呈現(xiàn)出的共性進行了歸納與分析,解釋了二者和而不同的特點。 當然,這一論題的外延是十分廣泛的,因此,可選取的研究角度也是多元的,本文從詩歌角度研究,縱然不能窮其全部,但換一個視角看問題,對于學術(shù)研究來說是非常有益的。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the world proletarian literature, Chinese and Japanese proletarian poetry set off a red tide in Asia from the beginning of 20th century to 30s. Poetry critics and poets have made a new attempt in the theoretical construction and creation of proletarian poetry. Although the development of Chinese proletarian poetry has an indelible Japanese brand, Chinese poets are in a special historical environment. Through their own continuous efforts to make our proletarian poetry radiate brilliant brilliance. The relationship between Chinese and Japanese modern literature has always been the subject of widespread concern in academic circles. Taking proletarian poetry as a starting point is a useful attempt to clarify the context of their development. It can also reveal the general law of the development of poetry (or even literature), comb the causes of the occurrence, development and decline of literary phenomena, and then provide a new perspective for the study of proletarian literature in China and Japan. The discussion of proletarian poetry in China and Japan is mainly carried out in the following parts:. The first chapter mainly uses the method of influence research, presents the formation process of both of them completely, analyzes and summarizes the causes of their formation from two aspects of external influence and internal development, and evaluates their positive and negative effects. It provides the basis for the discussion of the following chapters. The second and third chapters use parallel research methods to analyze the similarities and differences in the development of Chinese and Japanese proletarian poetry from the two aspects of theory and creation. Therefore, the second chapter mainly discusses their differences. At the same time, because of the differences of their creative characteristics and the time of development, the third chapter is based on this. This paper sums up and analyzes the generality of the two from the content and form of poetry creation, and explains their characteristics of harmony but difference. Of course, the extension of this thesis is very extensive, therefore, the research angle that can be selected is also diverse. This paper studies from the perspective of poetry, even though it can not be exhaustive, but from another angle of view to see the problem. It is very useful for academic research.
【學位授予單位】：西南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I0-03;I106.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉靜;;中國詩歌會創(chuàng)作得失論[J];重慶工學院學報(社會科學版);2007年01期

2 張向東;對左翼文學的評價和重寫文學史的思考[J];重慶社會科學;2005年03期

3 林偉民;試論左翼文學關(guān)于創(chuàng)作方法理論的探索[J];華東師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2002年01期

4 程光煒;左翼文學思潮與現(xiàn)代性[J];海南師范學院學報(人文社會科學版);2002年05期

5 陸詠梅;政治文化視角:左翼文學的政治化傾向[J];杭州師范學院學報(自然科學版);2003年03期

6 韓雪臨;三十年代初左翼文學與現(xiàn)實主義理論[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年03期

7 陳國恩;“拉普”和中國左翼文學批評的歷史反思[J];重慶三峽學院學報;2004年05期

8 張同道;火的吶喊與夢的呢哺——三十年代的左翼詩潮與現(xiàn)代主義詩潮[J];文學評論;1997年01期

9 曹清華;“左聯(lián)”成立與左翼身份建構(gòu)——一個歷史事件的解剖[J];文藝理論研究;2005年03期

10 劉靜;論普羅詩派[J];西安聯(lián)合大學學報;2004年01期

，

本文編號：1580726