泰戈?duì)柵c葉芝詩(shī)學(xué)思想比較
本文選題：泰戈?duì)?/strong> 切入點(diǎn)：葉芝 出處：《西南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
【摘要】：印度詩(shī)人泰戈?duì)柡蛺蹱柼m詩(shī)人葉芝是二十世紀(jì)的兩位重要詩(shī)人,兩人因詩(shī)結(jié)友、袒露真心、互相欣賞、友誼天長(zhǎng),他們的文學(xué)觀念、詩(shī)學(xué)思想在諸多方面呈現(xiàn)出同中有異、異中有同的特點(diǎn)。泰戈?duì)柵c葉芝皆具有一種神秘主義詩(shī)學(xué)思想,泰戈?duì)柕纳衩刂髁x詩(shī)學(xué)思想與印度傳統(tǒng)宗教哲學(xué)思想融為一體,它始白宗教、歸于信仰,呈現(xiàn)為一種宗教哲學(xué)形態(tài)；葉芝的神秘主義詩(shī)學(xué)思想導(dǎo)于性情、歸依自性,呈現(xiàn)為一種更為個(gè)人化的神秘哲學(xué)形態(tài)。在詩(shī)學(xué)本體論上,泰戈?duì)柡腿~芝對(duì)文學(xué)的本質(zhì)、文學(xué)的目的、文學(xué)的內(nèi)容與形式以及藝術(shù)與現(xiàn)實(shí)的關(guān)系等諸多詩(shī)學(xué)核心理論問(wèn)題作出了系統(tǒng)深刻的闡釋。泰戈?duì)柵c葉芝都不是一種嚴(yán)格意義上的現(xiàn)代主義詩(shī)人,而只是作為時(shí)間維度上的現(xiàn)代詩(shī)人。在對(duì)現(xiàn)代主義文學(xué)的態(tài)度上,泰戈?duì)柡腿~芝通過(guò)批評(píng)闡發(fā)了相關(guān)詩(shī)學(xué)主張。同時(shí)緣于現(xiàn)代主義的共時(shí)性影響,泰戈?duì)柡腿~芝的詩(shī)學(xué)思想中又融匯了某些現(xiàn)代主義因素,尤其是象征主義詩(shī)學(xué)因素。通過(guò)對(duì)泰戈?duì)柵c葉芝的詩(shī)學(xué)思想作出比較研究,我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn),跨越了東、西方文化之間,跨越了不同國(guó)度之間的共同的詩(shī)學(xué)思想與美學(xué)思想的確存在。 本文共分為三部分。第一部分,從考察泰戈?duì)柵c葉芝文學(xué)交往的實(shí)證性研究入手,主要探討泰戈?duì)柵c葉芝的神秘主義詩(shī)學(xué)思想及其異同。第二部分,主要通過(guò)分析泰戈?duì)�、葉芝對(duì)文學(xué)的本質(zhì)、文學(xué)的目的、文學(xué)內(nèi)容與形式以及藝術(shù)與現(xiàn)實(shí)的關(guān)系等詩(shī)學(xué)基本理論的闡述,對(duì)他們的詩(shī)學(xué)思想異同作出較深度的厘定與比較。第三部分,首先討論泰戈?duì)柵c葉芝非現(xiàn)代主義身份問(wèn)題,然后通過(guò)分析泰戈?duì)�、葉芝對(duì)待現(xiàn)代主義文學(xué)的態(tài)度來(lái)考察他們的詩(shī)學(xué)思想,最后對(duì)泰戈?duì)�、葉芝詩(shī)學(xué)思想中蘊(yùn)含的現(xiàn)代主義因素作出評(píng)述,以豐富對(duì)泰戈?duì)�、葉芝詩(shī)學(xué)思想的理解。
[Abstract]:In 20th century, Indian poet Tagore and Irish poet Yeats were two important poets. Because of their poems, they formed friends, revealed their sincerity, appreciated each other, and enjoyed each other for a long time. Their literary concepts and poetic thoughts showed similarities and differences in many aspects. Tagore and Yeats both have a mystical poetics thought. Tagore's mystical poetics thought and Indian traditional religious philosophy thought merge into one, and it begins to white religion and belongs to faith. Yeats's mystical poetics is based on temperament, and becomes a more individualized form of mystical philosophy. In terms of poetic ontology, Tagore and Yeats's essence of literature, The purpose of literature, the content and form of literature, the relationship between art and reality, and so on, are systematically and profoundly explained. Neither Tagore nor Yeats is a modernist poet in a strict sense. Tagore and Yeats have explained the relevant poetics through criticism. At the same time, due to the synchronic influence of modernism, Tagore and Yeats have expressed their views on modernist literature. In Tagore and Yeats's poetics, there are also some modernist elements, especially symbolism poetics. Through a comparative study of Tagore's and Yeats's poetics, we can see that they have crossed between eastern and western cultures. There are common poetic and aesthetic thoughts across different countries. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part, starting with the empirical study of the literary communication between Tagore and Yeats, mainly discusses the mystical poetic thoughts of Tagore and Yeats and their similarities and differences. The second part, mainly through the analysis of Tagore, Yeats expounds the basic theories of poetics, such as the essence of literature, the purpose of literature, the content and form of literature, and the relationship between art and reality, and makes a deeper determination and comparison of the similarities and differences of their poetic thoughts. This paper first discusses the non-modernist identity of Tagore and Yeats, and then analyzes Tagore and Yeats' attitude towards modernist literature to examine their poetic thoughts. In order to enrich the understanding of Tagore and Yeats poetics, the modernist factors contained in Yeh's poetics are reviewed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：I0-03;I106.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李正栓;劉露溪;;論詩(shī)人思想研究兼評(píng)蒲度戎的《生命樹上鳳凰巢——葉芝詩(shī)歌象征美學(xué)研究》[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期
2 侯傳文;泰戈?duì)栐?shī)學(xué)和諧論[J];東方論壇.青島大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期
3 傅浩;;葉芝作品中的基督教元素[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);2008年06期
4 傅浩;葉芝的戲劇實(shí)驗(yàn)[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);1999年03期
5 何林;;論葉芝詩(shī)歌創(chuàng)作的私人性和公共性[J];貴州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年08期
6 宋悅;讀《吉檀迦利》,體會(huì)泰戈?duì)柕乃囆g(shù)觀[J];石家莊經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期
7 肖四新;;論泰戈?duì)柕膶徝览硐隱J];宜昌師專學(xué)報(bào);1995年02期
8 方漢泉;略論葉芝其人其詩(shī)[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1992年04期
9 黃海容;葉芝的象征主義及其發(fā)展[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年01期
10 邱紫華;超越與解脫的冥想──《奧義書》的宗教哲學(xué)本體論與認(rèn)識(shí)論[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張毅;葉芝的三副面具[D];西南大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號(hào)：1568226
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yishull/1568226.html
