【摘要】：亞里士多德的《詩術(shù)》僅存論肅劇部分,論諧劇部分佚失或根本就沒寫。當(dāng)代著名意大利學(xué)者�？乱孕≌f虛構(gòu)的方式假定,《詩術(shù)》的諧劇部分被中世紀(jì)晚期的基督教修士扼殺在修院圖書館密室。《詩術(shù)》第4～5兩章中有涉及諧劇的段落,亞里士多德對諧劇的基本看法是:與肅劇模仿高尚的行為相比,諧劇僅模仿低俗的行為。從而,詩術(shù)有高尚與低俗的品質(zhì)高低之分。通過對比可以看到,�？乱孕≌f虛構(gòu)的方式解構(gòu)了亞里士多德的詩術(shù)的如此高低之分。
[Abstract]:Aristotle's Poetry only exists in the melodrama part, and the anecdotal part is lost or not written at all. Eko, a famous contemporary Italian scholar, assumes, in fiction, that the melodrama part of the poem was strangled by Christian monks in the late Middle Ages in the secluded chamber of the academy library. Chapters 4-5 of the Book of Poetry contain passages relating to the play. Aristotle's basic view of melodrama is that, compared with the mimicry of the virtuous drama, the play only imitates the vulgar behavior. Thus, poetry has noble and vulgar quality. By contrast, Eko deconstructs Aristotle's poetry in fictional ways.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國人民大學(xué)文學(xué)院“211工程”第三期項(xiàng)目“經(jīng)典與解釋”階段性成果
【分類號】：I106.3
，

本文編號：2459530