本文選題：普魯塔克 + 《對傳集》　； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：普魯塔克是一位羅馬帝國初期的希臘著作家，一生經(jīng)歷豐富，藉其宏富的著述和思想名揚(yáng)后世，據(jù)其現(xiàn)存著作輯合而成的《傳記集》和《道德論集》，已成為傳世經(jīng)典，，影響深遠(yuǎn)。《提秀斯傳》是普魯塔克現(xiàn)存著作合集《傳記集》中的一篇，屬于普魯塔克傳記作品中的《對傳集》系列，與《羅慕路斯傳》搭配成對，為普魯塔克所列傳主之最古者。 本文以《提秀斯傳》為中心研究普魯塔克，主要討論三個方面的問題。 第一，普魯塔克傳記作品研究的背景與問題介紹，即立足于現(xiàn)存文獻(xiàn)記載，推測還原普魯塔克生平；梳理普魯塔克著作的版本流傳，厘清現(xiàn)存著作分類的淵源和認(rèn)識上的概念誤區(qū)，尤其是《傳記集》與《對傳集》的混用；概括普魯塔克賴以成名的傳記作品《對傳集》的總體特點(diǎn)，即作為傳記體裁凸顯傳主性格以為效仿典范的傳記特點(diǎn)，以及“導(dǎo)論”、“合論”、“對傳形式”等傳記結(jié)構(gòu)方面的特點(diǎn)，從而為《提秀斯傳》的研究提供整體的視域背景。 第二，討論普魯塔克《提秀斯傳》所敘傳主提秀斯的歷史真實性。通過現(xiàn)存文獻(xiàn)資料和考古資料的概述，勾勒出歷史中提秀斯形象演變的基本脈絡(luò)，強(qiáng)調(diào)目前的資料雖能確定提秀斯確有其人，但其身份與普魯塔克筆下作為雅典國王和城邦創(chuàng)立者身份的提秀斯相對立，后者的身份和真實性是后世雅典人的追述、創(chuàng)造和認(rèn)同，這種形象的演變和其背后的現(xiàn)實需要是真實的。 第三，分析普魯塔克筆下的提秀斯，討論《對傳集》視域下《提秀斯傳》的特點(diǎn)。普魯塔克在撰寫過程中基本按照時間順序記述提秀斯，但在敘述過程中的史料運(yùn)用卻體現(xiàn)著自己的傾向，這與傳記末“合論”中的評述相呼應(yīng)，體現(xiàn)普魯塔克傳記結(jié)構(gòu)的統(tǒng)一性；普魯塔克承認(rèn)提秀斯的故事中有許多虛妄神話成分，因而循以“求真”的態(tài)度，在記述過程中較為罕見地引述了大量史家的觀點(diǎn)，以及月歷、節(jié)慶和碑銘記載等資料以為例證，雖然其“求真”的態(tài)度體現(xiàn)出普魯塔克的史家風(fēng)范，也體現(xiàn)出《提秀斯傳》有別于其他傳記作品的獨(dú)特之處，但普魯塔克筆下的提秀斯并未能使人信服其歷史真實性，普魯塔克的“求真”服務(wù)于豐富傳主形象、凸顯傳主性格以為模仿典范的目的。
[Abstract]:Plutarch was a Greek writer in the early Roman Empire, who had rich experience in his life. His works and ideas were famous for later generations. According to the collection of his extant works, Biography and moral Theory, they have become the classics of the world. The Biography of Thebes is one of Plutarch's existing collections of works, Biography, which is part of the collection of Biography of Plutarch, paired with Romulus. The oldest of Plutarch's list of preachers. This paper focuses on the study of Plutarch, and discusses three problems. First, the background and problems of Plutarch's biographical research, that is, based on the existing literature records, the author speculated that Plutarch's life was restored, and combed the versioning of Plutarch's works. To clarify the origin of the classification of existing works and the conceptual misunderstandings, especially the mixed use of Biography and Biography, and to summarize the general characteristics of Plutarch's famous biographical works, That is to say, as a biographical genre, the biographical features of the biographical character of imitating the model, as well as the characteristics of the biographical structure, such as "introduction", "combination theory", "the form of biography" and so on, can provide the overall horizon background for the study of the Biography of Tinius. Secondly, it discusses the historical authenticity of the narrator of Tyrus in Plutarch. Through an overview of the existing literature and archaeological materials, this paper outlines the basic context of the evolution of the image of Titius in history, and emphasizes that while the current data can confirm that Titius is indeed a human being, But his identity is opposite to that of Tyrus, described by Plutarch as the king of Athens and the founder of the city-state. The identity and authenticity of the latter are traced, created and identified by later Athenians. The evolution of this image and the realistic needs behind it are real. Thirdly, it analyzes the characteristics of Tyrus in Plutarch's works, and discusses the characteristics of the Biography of Tinius in the field of view. Plutarch basically wrote about Titius in chronological order, but the use of historical materials in the process of narration reflected his own tendency, which echoed the comments in the last part of the biography. The unity of Plutarch's biographical structure; Plutarch acknowledges that there are many false mythological elements in the story of Thebes, and thus, in the course of the narrative, with a "truth-seeking" attitude, makes a relatively rare reference to the views of a large number of historians, as well as to the monthly calendar. The festival and inscription records are illustrative, although his attitude of "seeking truth" reflects Plutarch's style of historiography, as well as the uniqueness of the Biography of Titius, which is different from other biographical works. However, Plutarch's Tyrus fails to convince people of its historical authenticity. Plutarch's "seeking truth" serves to enrich the image of the master and to highlight the purpose of his character as imitation of the model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I545.075

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐松巖;提秀斯改革新論[J];安徽史學(xué);2003年01期

2 張強(qiáng);;《帕羅斯碑》譯注[J];古代文明;2007年02期

3 郭圣銘;;古希臘傳記作家普魯塔克[J];歷史教學(xué);1983年01期

4 郭小凌;論普魯塔克《名人傳》的史學(xué)意義[J];史學(xué)集刊;1995年03期

5 日知;際陶;;關(guān)于雅典國家產(chǎn)生的年代問題[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;1980年04期

6 王成軍;;中西傳記史學(xué)的產(chǎn)生及趨向之比較[J];史學(xué)理論研究;2009年03期

7 呂厚量;;從三篇阿格西勞斯傳記的差異看奈波斯與普魯塔克對西方傳記史學(xué)的貢獻(xiàn)[J];史學(xué)史研究;2011年02期

8 趙平;;普盧塔克和他的《希臘羅馬名人比較列傳》[J];文化譯叢;1988年01期

9 周躍;;舉世聞名的《希臘羅馬名人比較列傳》[J];文化譯叢;1993年02期

10 李少雍;;司馬遷與普魯塔克[J];文學(xué)評論;1986年05期

本文編號：1969501