發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-30 20:20

  本文選題：布魯克斯 + 詩歌�。� 參考：《湖北大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：一切被摧毀又被試圖重新建立的二十世紀(jì),其時(shí)代精神與詩歌境遇在“上帝死了”的信仰廢墟中陷入危機(jī),“新批評(píng)派”則妄圖從這片廢墟中突圍并重建其價(jià)值王國�？肆炙埂げ剪斂怂棺鳛椤靶屡u(píng)派”的重要學(xué)者,試圖在詩歌批評(píng)領(lǐng)域建構(gòu)自己的詩學(xué)奇跡與信仰。 布魯克斯詩歌理論的核心概念大致可以分為“詩歌結(jié)構(gòu)論”,“悖論”與“反諷”的批評(píng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)觀、文本“細(xì)讀原則”的批評(píng)實(shí)踐等幾個(gè)方面。本文主要分為三個(gè)大的板塊,嘗試著采用結(jié)構(gòu)化的方式對(duì)其詩論核心“結(jié)構(gòu)論”進(jìn)行闡釋。具體的策略是進(jìn)入布魯克斯詩歌批評(píng)的場(chǎng)域,對(duì)其詩歌批評(píng)的具體文本進(jìn)行解讀,從中清理出有關(guān)詩歌批評(píng)的基本命題和重要問題,繼而在反觀二十世紀(jì)西方詩歌批評(píng)傳統(tǒng),借鑒當(dāng)代詩歌批評(píng)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,力求歷史的、客觀的、系統(tǒng)的對(duì)研究對(duì)象進(jìn)行梳理、整合與剖析,并在一定程度上歸納布魯克斯詩歌結(jié)構(gòu)論對(duì)當(dāng)下社會(huì)語境中的文學(xué)批評(píng)價(jià)值重建的啟示意義。 第一部分為布魯克斯詩歌理論導(dǎo)論,主要從二十世紀(jì)時(shí)代精神與詩歌境遇的窺探性描述入手,導(dǎo)入對(duì)詩歌批評(píng)理論價(jià)值判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的關(guān)注,結(jié)合新批評(píng)文藝觀,分析布魯克斯詩歌理論的背景,挖掘其理論核心,并從新的視域切入對(duì)其詩歌理論進(jìn)行總結(jié)性歸納。 第二部分是布魯克斯詩歌理論的“批評(píng)原則”部分,旨在挖掘詩歌“結(jié)構(gòu)論”這一核心范疇的多重內(nèi)涵,從中提煉、總結(jié)理論原則。并對(duì)其詩歌理論的兩個(gè)重要范疇且現(xiàn)今仍然流行于文學(xué)批評(píng)界的術(shù)語——“悖論”與“反諷”進(jìn)行追本溯源的考察,在厘清“批評(píng)術(shù)語”與“結(jié)構(gòu)論觀”看似前后不一的矛盾所由之后,揭示布魯克斯詩歌理論的內(nèi)在一致性。 第三部分是布魯克斯詩歌理論的“批評(píng)實(shí)踐”部分,以其最重要的詩歌理論著作《精致的甕》為切入點(diǎn),力圖通過分析論著中的詩歌批評(píng)范例,展示其詩歌理論的豐富性。另外對(duì)文本“細(xì)讀”原則進(jìn)行緣起分析,嘗試將“細(xì)讀法”納入不同詩歌場(chǎng)域進(jìn)行批評(píng)應(yīng)用,旨在揭橥布魯克斯詩歌理論在當(dāng)下學(xué)術(shù)土壤中的普適性與局限性。 結(jié)語部分,將布魯克斯的詩歌理論植入時(shí)代語境中進(jìn)行觀照,結(jié)合“價(jià)值重建的失效性”之時(shí)代批評(píng)癥候,指出當(dāng)前文化批評(píng)對(duì)文學(xué)批評(píng)肆意侵蝕的偏向,藉此進(jìn)一步強(qiáng)調(diào)對(duì)布魯克斯進(jìn)行批評(píng)與思考的重要性,肯定其對(duì)詩歌這門古老藝術(shù)進(jìn)行不同維度的文本分析的藝術(shù)救贖態(tài)度。
[Abstract]:In the 20th century, when everything was destroyed and tried to be re-established, its spirit and poetry were in crisis in the ruins of faith "God died", and the "New critics" attempted to break through the ruins and rebuild their kingdom of value. As an important scholar of Neo-criticism, Collins Brooks tries to construct his poetic miracle and belief in the field of poetry criticism. The core concepts of Brooks' poetry theory can be divided into three aspects: "poetic structure theory", "paradox" and "irony" critical standard view, and the critical practice of the text "detailed reading principle". This paper is divided into three major plates, trying to use a structured way to explain its poetic core "structure theory". The specific strategy is to enter the field of Brooks' poetry criticism, to interpret the specific texts of his poetry criticism, to clear out the basic propositions and important questions about poetry criticism, and then to look back at the tradition of western poetry criticism in the 20th century. On the basis of the theory of contemporary poetry criticism, the author tries his best to sort out, integrate and analyze the research object of history, objectivity and system. To a certain extent, it concludes the enlightening significance of Brooks' poetic structure theory to the reconstruction of the value of literary criticism in the current social context. The first part is the introduction of Brooks' poetry theory, which mainly starts with the peeping description of the spirit of the 20th century and the poetic situation, and introduces the attention to the value judgment standard of poetry criticism theory, combining with the new critical literature and art view. This paper analyzes the background of Brooks' poetry theory, excavates the core of his theory, and sums up his poetry theory from a new perspective. The second part is the "critical principle" of Brooks' poetry theory, which aims to excavate the multiple connotations of the core category of "structure theory" and summarize the theoretical principles. It also makes a retrospect of the two important categories of his poetry theory, the "paradox" and "irony", which are still popular in literary criticism. After clarifying the causes of the seemingly inconsistent contradiction between "critical terms" and "structural theory", this paper reveals the internal consistency of Brooks' poetic theory. The third part is the critical practice part of Brooks' poetry theory. It tries to show the richness of Brooks' poetic theory by analyzing the examples of poetry criticism in his most important poetic theory work, the exquisite urn. In addition, this paper analyzes the origin of the principle of "detailed reading", and attempts to apply the "detailed reading method" to different poetry fields in order to reveal the universality and limitation of the theory of poetry in the present academic soil. In the conclusion part, the author puts Brooks' poetic theory into the context of the times and points out the tendency of the current cultural criticism to the wanton erosion of literary criticism. It further emphasizes the importance of criticizing and pondering on Brooks, and affirms his artistic redemption attitude towards the ancient art of poetry in the different dimensions of text analysis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：I712.072

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃克劍;“透視主義”辯證[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2002年03期

2 趙一凡;;耶魯批評(píng)家及其學(xué)術(shù)天地[J];讀書;1988年02期

3 程亞林;布魯克斯和“精制的甕”及“硬漢”[J];讀書;1994年12期

4 劉富麗;;論濟(jì)慈“希臘古甕頌”中生態(tài)倫理的詩性建構(gòu)[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年01期

5 保羅·德曼,周穎;美國新批評(píng)的形式與意向[J];外國文學(xué);2001年02期

6 鄭崇選;從純文學(xué)到文學(xué)性[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

7 西村清和;梁艷萍;楊玲;;大眾文化的美學(xué)[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

8 梁艷萍;;游戲與勞動(dòng)的辯證法[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

9 趙丹;;回到文學(xué)本身:方法與觀念——論英美“新批評(píng)”學(xué)派“細(xì)讀批評(píng)”的意義與缺陷[J];吉林省教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(學(xué)科版);2008年11期

10 楊冬;;新批評(píng)派與有機(jī)整體論詩學(xué)[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 臧運(yùn)峰;新批評(píng)反諷及其現(xiàn)代神話[D];北京師范大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉思男;新批評(píng)派美學(xué)批評(píng)方法研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

2 顏東升;克爾凱郭爾反諷概念研究[D];河北大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1956647