本文選題：約翰·福爾斯 + 《法國中尉的女人》��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：約翰·福爾斯(1926-2005)是在世界文壇上享有盛名的20世紀(jì)英國小說家。他的代表作品《法國中尉的女人》(1969)自出版以來獲得了批評界和學(xué)術(shù)界的普遍贊譽。論文從新歷史主義理論視角,運用�？碌臋�(quán)利觀、懷特的元史學(xué)理論分析研究《法國中尉的女人》,旨在揭露在維多利亞時期被邊緣化的社會歷史事實——如達爾文“進化論”的提出、新興資產(chǎn)階級社會地位的變化、勞工階級的不利地位、自由主義的覺醒以及女性主義的發(fā)展,探討權(quán)力關(guān)系在作品中的運轉(zhuǎn),分析小說人物查爾斯、薩拉分別對維多利亞時期社會傳統(tǒng)的顛覆和對男權(quán)社會的顛覆,以及敘述者對傳統(tǒng)敘事形式的顛覆。文章認為,福爾斯在作品中通過對社會歷史沖突的揭露以及對歷史的顛覆強調(diào)了歷史的“虛構(gòu)性”,同時重構(gòu)了一個不同版本的維多利亞史(且其與正史同樣意義非凡),雖然他又指出自己版本的維多利亞史也是“不真實的”。論文運用懷特的元史學(xué)理論分析了文本的“虛構(gòu)性”,指出任何歷史文本都是社會歷史話語與意識形態(tài)的產(chǎn)物,進而探討了作品的話語結(jié)構(gòu)以及作者的意識形態(tài)。 論文共分為三個部分：引言、正文、結(jié)語。正文部分分為三章。第一章主要分析作品中涉及到的維多利亞時期存在的社會歷史沖突。第二章運用新歷史主義理論中從�？吕碚摪l(fā)展而來的“權(quán)利概念”分析作品中權(quán)力關(guān)系的變化,從三個方面揭露文本對歷史的“顛覆”。第三章運用懷特的元史學(xué)理論分析文本的“虛構(gòu)性”,指出作者重構(gòu)的歷史是社會歷史話語與意識形態(tài)的產(chǎn)物,然后探討了作品的話語結(jié)構(gòu)以及作者的意識形態(tài)。結(jié)語部分總結(jié)全文的主要觀點,指出任何歷史都是“虛構(gòu)”的,文學(xué)作品通過對主導(dǎo)意識形態(tài)的顛覆構(gòu)建自己版本的歷史,雖然這種重構(gòu)同時又受到作者意識形態(tài)的影響,依舊是“不真實的”。從新歷史主義的角度對文學(xué)作品進行研究,有利于認識作品中的社會歷史話語和意識形態(tài)的本質(zhì),從一個重要的維度加深對作品的理解。
[Abstract]:John Fowling (1926-2005) is a famous English novelist in the world. His representative work, the French Lieutenant's woman, has been widely acclaimed by critics and academics since its publication. From the perspective of New historicism, the thesis applies Foucault's view of right. White's theoretical analysis of meta-historiography "the woman of the French Lieutenant" aims to expose the social and historical facts that were marginalized in the Victorian period-such as Darwin's "Evolutionism", and the changes in the social status of the emerging bourgeoisie. The unfavorable position of the working class, the awakening of liberalism and the development of feminism, discuss the function of power relation in the works, and analyze the novel character Charles. Sarah subverts the Victorian tradition and patriarchal society, and the narrator subverts the traditional narrative form. The article holds that Fowles emphasizes the "fictitious nature" of history in his works by exposing social and historical conflicts and subverting history. At the same time, he reconstructs a different version of Victorian history (and it is as significant as official history), although he points out that his version of Victorian History is also "untrue". Based on White's theory of meta-historiography, this paper analyzes the "fictitious nature" of the text, points out that any historical text is the product of social and historical discourse and ideology, and then probes into the discourse structure of the work and the author's ideology. The thesis is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter mainly analyzes the Victorian period of social and historical conflicts involved in the works. The second chapter analyzes the changes of power relations in the works by using the concept of right developed from Foucault's theory in the new historicism theory, and exposes the "subversion" of history in the text from three aspects. The third chapter analyzes the fictitious nature of the text by using White's theory of meta-historiography, and points out that the author's reconstructed history is the product of social and historical discourse and ideology, and then discusses the discourse structure of the work and the author's ideology. The conclusion part summarizes the main points of the full text, and points out that any history is "fictional". Literary works construct their own version of history through subversion of dominant ideology, although this reconstruction is also influenced by the author's ideology at the same time. Still unreal. The study of literary works from the perspective of new historicism is conducive to understanding the essence of social and historical discourse and ideology in the works and deepening the understanding of the works from an important dimension.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：I561.074

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 劉若端;神秘的薩拉——評福爾斯的女權(quán)主義思想[J];外國文學(xué)評論;1989年03期

2 盛寧;文本的虛構(gòu)性與歷史的重構(gòu)——從《法國中尉的女人》的刪節(jié)談起[J];外國文學(xué)評論;1991年04期

3 陳榕;;莎拉是自由的嗎?——解讀《法國中尉的女人》的最后一個結(jié)尾[J];外國文學(xué)評論;2006年03期

4 陳靜;;《法國中尉的女人》的存在主義解讀[J];外國文學(xué)研究;2007年05期

5 王岳川;新歷史主義:話語與權(quán)力之維[J];益陽師專學(xué)報;1999年01期

，

本文編號：1894049