本文選題：田納西·威廉姆斯 + 《玻璃動物園》��； 參考：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：田納西·威廉姆斯，原名托馬斯·托尼爾·威廉斯，是美國二戰(zhàn)后最為有名望的戲劇家之一。作為其首部大獲成功的自傳體戲劇《玻璃動物園》，自問世以來一直備受觀眾和評論家的關(guān)注，對當(dāng)代喜劇影響頗大。但遺憾的是，，鮮有人從弗洛伊德的精神分析學(xué)及德里達(dá)的解構(gòu)主義角度來分析該喜劇，特別是該劇中出現(xiàn)的“第五個人物”溫菲爾德先生。鑒于此，本文從這兩個角度對劇中在場及缺席的人物進(jìn)行分析得出結(jié)論：溫菲爾德家的悲劇根源正是那位看似缺席卻時刻能被觀眾明顯感覺到的“第五人物”溫菲爾德先生。 本文從三個方面展開對該劇進(jìn)行分析。文章先分析了劇中被溫菲爾德先生拋棄的三位家庭成員：母親阿曼達(dá)是位有激情的婦女，但總生活在對自己少年時代的回憶中；女兒羅拉因為太敏感自己輕微的跛腳而將自己與外部世界隔離；本劇的敘述者，自私的兒子湯姆雖是家中的頂梁柱卻總是夢想著離家出走。本文通過分析指出這個家庭及家庭各個成員的的悲劇源于離家出走，拋妻棄兒的溫菲爾德先生。 接下來，本文應(yīng)用弗洛伊德的精神分析法對各個家庭人物進(jìn)行解剖，指出形成其古怪性格及行為的原因是他們在對現(xiàn)實幻滅后所采取的自我保護(hù)機(jī)制，而他們失望的根源同樣是來自缺席的溫菲爾德先生。通過對在場及缺席人物的分析，本文彰顯了該劇中缺席較之在場的優(yōu)勢地位，同時提出假設(shè)：如果缺席的溫菲爾德先生也在場，劇情及人物命運(yùn)會如何發(fā)展？根據(jù)德里達(dá)的解構(gòu)主義關(guān)于在場和缺席這對二元對立的相關(guān)理論假設(shè)，本文證明德里達(dá)理論假設(shè)的可行性。 基于以上的相關(guān)分析，本文向觀眾呈現(xiàn)了一個更為真實的溫菲爾德先生——雖缺席，但無時無刻不在影響著在場的人物及劇情發(fā)展，他才是整個戲劇發(fā)展的導(dǎo)線，他才是導(dǎo)致該劇人物悲劇的真正原因。
[Abstract]:Tennessee Williams, formerly known as Thomas Tornier Williams, is the United States after World War II, one of the most famous dramatist. As the first major success of the autobiographical drama "glass zoo >, since much of the audience and critics, of considerable contemporary comedy. But unfortunately, few people study and Derrida from the Perspective of deconstruction the spirit of Freud to analyze the comedy, especially the play" fifth characters "of Mr. Winfield. In view of this, this paper analyzes the conclusion of the present and absent characters from the two aspects: Winfield's tragedy is the seemingly absent but always can be the audience clearly feel the" fifth the character of Mr. Winfield. "
This paper from the three aspects of the play are analyzed. The paper first analyses the three family members of Mr. Winfield's mother abandoned: Amanda is a passionate woman, but life in their childhood memories; daughter Laura too sensitive his light and his lame and external the world of isolation; the narrator, selfish son Tom is home to Ding Liangzhu has always dreamed of running away. This article points out that all the family and the family tragedy originated from the runaways, left his wife abandoned Mr. Winfield.
Next, by using the method of Freud's psychoanalysis were dissected for each family characters, pointed out the reason forming the eccentric personality and behavior are they in the reality after the lost self protection mechanism and the source of their disappointment is also absent from Mr. Winfield. Through the analysis of the presence and absence of figures, this paper demonstrates the the play is the presence of absence of dominant position, and puts forward the hypothesis: if Mr. Winfield was absent, the story and the fate of the characters will be how to develop? According to Derrida's deconstruction about the presence and absence of the binary opposition between the two theoretical assumptions, this paper proves the feasibility of Derrida theory hypothesis.
Based on the above analysis, this paper presents to the audience a more real MR Winfield, despite the absence, but not in the presence of every hour and moment affects the characters and plot development, he is the conductor of the drama development, he is the real cause of the drama tragedy.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I712.073

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 何芳;;論“父親之名”在《玻璃動物園》中的作用[J];外國語文;2010年03期

2 趙冬梅;田納西·威廉斯筆下的南方淑女之消亡[J];天津外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年05期

3 楊林;;《玻璃動物園》的象征手法[J];信陽農(nóng)業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2011年02期

4 何芳;;詩意化之魅力悲劇——評《玻璃動物園》[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年02期

本文編號：1744925