契訶夫與劉震云生存狀態(tài)書寫比較研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-20 16:24
本文選題:契訶夫 切入點:劉震云 出處:《遼寧大學》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:生存狀態(tài)書寫,是指作家在作品中關注現(xiàn)實生活中人的生命狀態(tài)和生活情狀,包括人的處境和遭遇,所經(jīng)受的痛苦與災難,強調(diào)的是對人本身生存狀態(tài)的關注和對生命意義和價值的思考。生存狀況書寫以及對人生存現(xiàn)狀的審視和關照構(gòu)成了在契訶夫和劉震云的小說的重要內(nèi)容。 契訶夫從日常生活中最平凡的人平凡事情入手,廣泛反映現(xiàn)實生活,揭露社會的潰瘍,征討反動腐惡,鞭笞市儈庸俗,同時表達對新生活的憧憬和呼喚。比如諷刺官場丑態(tài)的《釘子上》、《胖子和瘦子》、《一個文官之死》,,描寫沙皇俄國世態(tài)炎涼的《苦惱》,控訴沙皇黑暗統(tǒng)治的《第六病室》以及批判小市民庸俗氣息的《約內(nèi)奇》、《醋栗》等。劉震云是新時期新寫實主義文學的代表作家,他的作品多取材于普通平民和基層干部的日常生活及農(nóng)村生活的變遷,并以特定的視角對人的生存狀態(tài)、命運、人性進行現(xiàn)實的觀照。 契訶夫是十九世紀末俄國偉大的批判現(xiàn)實主義大師,劉震云是中國新時期新寫實主義文學的重要代表作家,盡管兩者所處的時代、寫作背景有很多的不同,但他們在題材的設定、人物的選擇等方面,即描寫平凡人的平凡生活,展示普通人的生存狀態(tài),從這個層面而言,兩者之間存在著極大的相似性,本論文即是從這個角度出發(fā),就生存狀態(tài)書寫展開比較研究。 本論文采用平行研究的方法,首先概述契訶夫和劉震云兩者的生存狀態(tài)寫作狀況,然后從藝術闡釋和現(xiàn)實關照兩個層面展開對比分析,并進行綜合探究。對生存狀態(tài)的藝術闡釋,主要從荒誕、真實和異化三個層面展開;論述生存狀態(tài)書寫的現(xiàn)實關照,主要從群體生存生存關照、社會批判和價值重構(gòu)三個方面進行;通過具體的文本分析,比較分析契訶夫與劉震云筆下生存狀態(tài)書寫的異與同,引發(fā)人們對生活、生存、命運以及人個體本身的思考。
[Abstract]:The writing of living state refers to the writer's concern about the state of life and the state of life in real life in his works, including the human condition and experience, and the suffering and disaster experienced by the writer. What is emphasized is the attention to the living state of human beings and the consideration of the meaning and value of life. The writing of the living conditions and the examination and care of the present situation of human existence constitute the important contents of the novels in Chekhov and Liu Zhenyun. Chekhov began with the most mundane things of the most ordinary people in his daily life, extensively reflected real life, exposed the ulcers of society, demanded reactionary evils, and flogged the philistine vulgarity. At the same time express the hope and call for a new life. For example, sarcastic official ugly "on the nail", "fat and thin", "the death of a civil servant", describing the tsar Russia in the world of "distress", accusing the czar of the dark rule of < 6th disease. "Room" and "Jonich", "gooseberry", etc. Liu Zhenyun is the representative writer of new realism literature in the new era. Most of his works are based on the daily life of ordinary civilians and grassroots cadres and the changes of rural life, and take a realistic view of people's living state, fate and human nature from a specific angle of view. Chekhov is a great Russian critical realism master at the end of 19th century. Liu Zhenyun is an important representative writer of new realism literature in China. But they in the subject matter setting, the character choice and so on, namely describes the ordinary person's ordinary life, displays the ordinary person's survival condition, from this aspect, there is the great similarity between the two, this paper is embarks from this angle, A comparative study was carried out on the writing of living state. In this paper, the parallel research method is used to summarize the living state of Chekhov and Liu Zhenyun, and then to compare and analyze them from the two aspects of artistic interpretation and realistic care. The artistic interpretation of the state of existence is mainly carried out from three aspects of absurdity, truth and alienation, and the realistic care of the writing of the state of existence, mainly from the perspective of the survival of the group, is discussed. Through the concrete text analysis, the author compares and analyzes the differences and similarities between Chekhov and Liu Zhenyun in the writing of the living state, which causes people to think about life, survival, fate and the individual.
【學位授予單位】:遼寧大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:I106-03
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前2條
1 劉震云;孫聿為;;與記者的對話[J];當代(長篇小說選刊);2009年03期
2 河西;;劉震云:荒誕沒有底線[J];南風窗;2012年19期
本文編號:1639883
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/1639883.html