【摘要】：張江先生提出"‘意圖’在不在場(chǎng)"的疑問有顯著的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。"作者之死"或"意圖謬誤"的一套學(xué)說,有其現(xiàn)代理論發(fā)生發(fā)展的背景,是20世紀(jì)人文學(xué)科大背景變遷的產(chǎn)物,也是文學(xué)理論批評(píng)轉(zhuǎn)向的內(nèi)在需要。作為一種現(xiàn)代主義思潮,它既有時(shí)代的必然性,又有其偏頗。實(shí)際上,即使是最激進(jìn)的文本論者,如德曼和德里達(dá),在他們討論文本時(shí),也要與作者發(fā)生不解之緣。批評(píng)活動(dòng)終究是通過解釋作品來完成對(duì)作家或詩人的文學(xué)史或思想史的定位,通過闡發(fā)作家或詩人建立起一種思想或理念。即使再難理解和把握的作家(詩人),批評(píng)家也在所不惜通過支離破碎的文本去建立完整的作家(詩人)形象。1990年代以后的中國文學(xué)確實(shí)在思想高揚(yáng)方面遇到困境,今天重振中國文學(xué)的思想力量乃是批評(píng)的責(zé)任,這也確實(shí)需要文學(xué)批評(píng)通過作品文本去闡發(fā)作家(詩人)的思想,如此,文學(xué)理論和批評(píng)重新重視"作者意圖"就成為一項(xiàng)有意義的互動(dòng)創(chuàng)作。
[Abstract]:Mr. Zhang Jiang's question of whether 'intention' is present is of great practical significance. The death of the author "or" the fallacy of intention "has the background of the development of the modern theory, which is the product of the great background change of the humanities in the 20th century, and is also the internal need of the turn of literary theory criticism. As a modernist trend of thought, it not only has the inevitability of the times, but also has its bias. In fact, even the most radical text theorists, such as Derman and Derrida, are inextricably close to the author when they discuss the text. After all, the critical activity is to define the literary history or ideological history of the writer or poet by interpreting the works, and to establish a kind of thought or idea by explaining the writer or poet. Even writers (poets) who are difficult to understand and grasp, critics do not hesitate to build a complete image of writers (poets) through fragmented texts. Chinese literature after the 1990s has indeed encountered difficulties in raising its minds. It is the responsibility of criticism to reinvigorate the ideological strength of Chinese literature today, which really requires literary criticism to explain the thoughts of writers (poets) through the texts of their works. Literary theory and criticism re-attach importance to the author's intention to become a meaningful interactive creation.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)中文系;
【基金】：教育部哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)重大委托項(xiàng)目(10JZDW005)
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 李林;;談新批評(píng)主義者如何運(yùn)用語言學(xué)解讀詩歌[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2008年09期

2 王敏;;解構(gòu)主義文學(xué)批評(píng)與新批評(píng)之關(guān)系研究[J];貴州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期

3 劉宗衍;;新批評(píng)主義和解構(gòu)主義的差異[J];科技創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)報(bào);2008年28期

4 張琦;;“科學(xué)”還是“信仰”?——從新批評(píng)到德里達(dá)[J];當(dāng)代外國文學(xué);2009年02期

5 石堅(jiān);王欣;張勁松;;文化語境中的凱恩斯主義和新批評(píng)[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年09期

6 楊松;;新批評(píng)簡要回顧[J];中國教師;2009年S1期

7 羅益民;;新批評(píng)的詩歌翻譯方法論[J];英語研究;2009年04期

8 王進(jìn);;試論形式主義與新批評(píng)學(xué)派的當(dāng)代性淵源[J];四川職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

9 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2468618