典型理論在中國當代邊緣化的歷史過程
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-19 16:13
【摘要】：典型理論是經(jīng)典馬克思主義文藝理論的重要范疇,曾經(jīng)被視為文學理論的核心問題。我國學者曾就典型的內(nèi)涵、典型的共性與個性、典型環(huán)境與典型人物等問題進行過多次大討論。然而,隨著時代的變化,典型理論在新時期以來逐漸失去往日的光輝,走向了邊緣化。關于典型理論邊緣化的問題,鮮有學者進行深入全面的研究。本文先以歷史研究的方式,結合我國不同時期的社會文化語境,客觀地探究典型理論在我國由中心走向邊緣的歷史過程,繼而較為全面地對典型理論邊緣化的原因進行分析與反思,從而就這個復雜的理論問題提出一些新的看法。本文除緒論部分外,由三章構成:第一章:典型理論的西方源起及中國的早期接受。本章首先探尋了典型理論在西方的源起和發(fā)展,對亞里士多德的早期學說、中世紀的類型說、黑格爾關于人物性格的論述及馬克思、恩格斯的典型觀進行一番考察;在此基礎上,探究了在蘇聯(lián)影響下,典型理論在中國的早期接受情況,從而為下文進一步研究典型理論邊緣化的問題奠定基礎。第二章:典型理論在中國:由中心到邊緣。20世紀50、60年代,學者們積極倡導典型理論,并對其進行了科學化、體系化的建設,典型理論的中心地位得到確立;隨著社會大環(huán)境的變化,典型理論在20世紀80年代中后期開始遭受冷遇;進入21世紀后,已少有學者再提及該理論。筆者從文學理論教材及理論工作者的新觀點出發(fā),對典型理論由盛而衰的邊緣化問題確立了研究的維度。第三章:典型理論邊緣化的原因與反思。一是外在原因,由于時代環(huán)境的巨變,意識形態(tài)寬松、多元文化建構、歐美文學思潮涌入、人們思想發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)變等,無不沖擊著典型理論;二是內(nèi)在原因,典型理論自身是非完滿的,具有政治化、封閉性、類型化、階級化、哲學化的傾向,學者在使用該理論進行文學批評時,易忽略文學形象本身的思想性、審美性和藝術性;三是在創(chuàng)作實踐上,典型理論遭遇了困境與挑戰(zhàn)。在文學創(chuàng)作多元化的當下,典型理論明顯缺乏普適性,追求客觀本質(zhì)的典型觀難以展現(xiàn)現(xiàn)代生活的碎片化、快節(jié)奏,無法充分揭示人們內(nèi)心的壓抑感和荒誕感,因此作家在創(chuàng)作時,往往不再視典型理論為指導了。
[Abstract]:Typical theory is an important category of classical Marxist literary theory, once regarded as the core of literary theory. Chinese scholars have discussed the typical connotation, the typical commonness and individuality, the typical environment and the typical personage many times. However, with the change of the times, the typical theory has gradually lost its former brilliance in the new period. On the issue of the marginalization of typical theories, few scholars have carried out in-depth and comprehensive research. This paper, in the way of historical research, combines the social and cultural context of different periods of our country, and explores objectively the historical process of the typical theory moving from center to edge in our country. Then it makes a comprehensive analysis and reflection on the reason of the marginalization of typical theory, and puts forward some new views on this complicated theoretical problem. In addition to the introduction, this paper consists of three chapters: chapter one: the origin of typical theory and the early acceptance of China. This chapter first explores the origin and development of the typical theory in the West, and examines Aristotle's early theory, the medieval theory of types, Hegel's exposition on the character of characters and Marx's and Engels' typical view. On this basis, it explores the early acceptance of the typical theory in China under the influence of the Soviet Union, thus laying a foundation for the further study of the marginalization of the typical theory. The second chapter: the typical theory in China: from center to edge. In the 1950s and 1960s, the scholars actively advocated the typical theory, and carried on the scientific, systematic construction, the typical theory center position has been established; With the change of the social environment, the typical theory began to suffer a cold reception in the middle and late 1980s. After entering the 21st century, few scholars have mentioned the theory again. Based on the teaching materials of literary theory and the new viewpoints of the theorists, the author establishes the dimension of the research on the marginalization of the typical theory from prosperity to decline. Chapter three: the reason and reflection of the marginalization of typical theory. First, external reasons, due to the great changes in the environment of the times, the loose ideology, the multicultural construction, the influx of European and American literary thoughts and the changes in people's thoughts, all of which are impacting on the typical theory, and the second is the internal reasons. The typical theory itself is not perfect and has the tendency of politicization, closure, typology, classization and philosophy. When scholars use the theory to criticize literature, they tend to ignore the ideological, aesthetic and artistic nature of the literary image itself. Third, in the creative practice, the typical theory encountered difficulties and challenges. At the present time when literary creation is diversified, the typical theory obviously lacks universality, and the typical view of pursuing objective essence is difficult to show the fragmentation and rapid rhythm of modern life, and can not fully reveal the oppression and absurdity of people's heart. Therefore, writers in the creation, often no longer regard the typical theory as a guide.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I0
本文編號：2281654
[Abstract]:Typical theory is an important category of classical Marxist literary theory, once regarded as the core of literary theory. Chinese scholars have discussed the typical connotation, the typical commonness and individuality, the typical environment and the typical personage many times. However, with the change of the times, the typical theory has gradually lost its former brilliance in the new period. On the issue of the marginalization of typical theories, few scholars have carried out in-depth and comprehensive research. This paper, in the way of historical research, combines the social and cultural context of different periods of our country, and explores objectively the historical process of the typical theory moving from center to edge in our country. Then it makes a comprehensive analysis and reflection on the reason of the marginalization of typical theory, and puts forward some new views on this complicated theoretical problem. In addition to the introduction, this paper consists of three chapters: chapter one: the origin of typical theory and the early acceptance of China. This chapter first explores the origin and development of the typical theory in the West, and examines Aristotle's early theory, the medieval theory of types, Hegel's exposition on the character of characters and Marx's and Engels' typical view. On this basis, it explores the early acceptance of the typical theory in China under the influence of the Soviet Union, thus laying a foundation for the further study of the marginalization of the typical theory. The second chapter: the typical theory in China: from center to edge. In the 1950s and 1960s, the scholars actively advocated the typical theory, and carried on the scientific, systematic construction, the typical theory center position has been established; With the change of the social environment, the typical theory began to suffer a cold reception in the middle and late 1980s. After entering the 21st century, few scholars have mentioned the theory again. Based on the teaching materials of literary theory and the new viewpoints of the theorists, the author establishes the dimension of the research on the marginalization of the typical theory from prosperity to decline. Chapter three: the reason and reflection of the marginalization of typical theory. First, external reasons, due to the great changes in the environment of the times, the loose ideology, the multicultural construction, the influx of European and American literary thoughts and the changes in people's thoughts, all of which are impacting on the typical theory, and the second is the internal reasons. The typical theory itself is not perfect and has the tendency of politicization, closure, typology, classization and philosophy. When scholars use the theory to criticize literature, they tend to ignore the ideological, aesthetic and artistic nature of the literary image itself. Third, in the creative practice, the typical theory encountered difficulties and challenges. At the present time when literary creation is diversified, the typical theory obviously lacks universality, and the typical view of pursuing objective essence is difficult to show the fragmentation and rapid rhythm of modern life, and can not fully reveal the oppression and absurdity of people's heart. Therefore, writers in the creation, often no longer regard the typical theory as a guide.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I0
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 杜曉杰;;“典型”的典型命運[J];寧波大學學報(人文科學版);2015年01期
2 周波;;關于文學典型問題的當代思考[J];山東師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2014年05期
3 舒開智;;馬克思主義“文學典型”學說新論[J];山西師大學報(社會科學版);2014年01期
4 曠新年;;典型概念的變遷[J];清華大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年01期
5 潘桂林;;揚棄:反本質(zhì)主義語境中“文學典型”的命運——文藝學學科建設中“文學典型”的定位思考[J];廣西社會科學;2011年02期
6 段思平;;淺探馬克思主義典型理論[J];文學教育(上);2009年05期
7 李鐵秀;龔宏;;中國現(xiàn)代典型理論與阿Q典型建構[J];文藝理論與批評;2008年05期
8 祝學劍;;1950年代典型問題論爭與《文藝報》[J];重慶三峽學院學報;2008年05期
9 黎芷伶;;馬克思主義典型理論的當代性探討[J];廣西青年干部學院學報;2008年04期
10 冉思瑋;;抗戰(zhàn)時期大后方文學典型理論的美學思考[J];重慶文理學院學報(社會科學版);2008年01期
相關碩士學位論文 前6條
1 劉向菲;中國現(xiàn)代文論中典型理論流變考論[D];鄭州大學;2011年
2 扈倩英;高爾基文學典型論及其當代意義光潛悲劇美學分析[D];遼寧大學;2013年
3 楊玉良;意境與典型比較論[D];華中師范大學;2002年
4 黃林琳;典型理論的深入探討[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學;2007年
5 謝朝坤;中國現(xiàn)代文論中典型理論研究[D];河南大學;2008年
6 徐立偉;典型作為“他者”形象的演變[D];大連大學;2009年
，本文編號：2281654
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2281654.html
