本文選題：關(guān)聯(lián) + 小說交際��； 參考：《長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文屬于跨學(xué)科研究,從語(yǔ)用學(xué)視角出發(fā),以傳統(tǒng)的文學(xué)理論和語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究涉及得較少的小說交際過程為研究對(duì)象,在關(guān)聯(lián)理論基礎(chǔ)上提出了“小說交際語(yǔ)用分析模式”。 本文首先系統(tǒng)地回顧了文學(xué)和語(yǔ)言學(xué)對(duì)小說的研究,指出從語(yǔ)用學(xué)角度研究小說交際具有可行性。其次,對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)理論用于文學(xué)研究做進(jìn)一步反思。再次,詳細(xì)分析了小說交際的參與者和小說交際中的語(yǔ)境知識(shí)。最后,在關(guān)聯(lián)理論基礎(chǔ)上建立了“小說交際語(yǔ)用分析模式”,旨在闡釋小說交際過程中多重意義的建構(gòu)與重構(gòu),即在以文本為媒介的明示——推理動(dòng)態(tài)闡釋過程中,作者(包括敘述者和人物)建構(gòu)意義和讀者重構(gòu)意義。 “小說交際語(yǔ)用分析模式”的構(gòu)成要素是文本、小說交際的參與者、小說交際的語(yǔ)境、作者和讀者所具有的語(yǔ)境知識(shí)。該模式提出下列觀點(diǎn):①作者創(chuàng)作了小說交際的媒介——文本。敘述者和人物構(gòu)成的文本世界由作者創(chuàng)建。②小說交際的參與者不僅包括作者和讀者,而且包括敘述者和人物。③作者和讀者之間的小說交際以人物之間的交際和敘述者與讀者之間的交際為途徑。交際的多樣性決定了小說交際語(yǔ)境的特殊性。小說交際在作者創(chuàng)作小說的語(yǔ)境、讀者閱讀小說的語(yǔ)境、敘述者講述故事的語(yǔ)境和小說人物使用語(yǔ)言的語(yǔ)境中進(jìn)行。④為了成功進(jìn)行小說交際,作者和讀者需要具備與這四種語(yǔ)境相關(guān)的語(yǔ)境知識(shí)。作者和讀者的語(yǔ)境知識(shí)包括語(yǔ)言知識(shí)、上下文知識(shí)、互文性知識(shí)、情景知識(shí)、背景知識(shí)和共有知識(shí)。 “小說交際語(yǔ)用分析模式”強(qiáng)調(diào)作者(包括敘述者和人物)明示和讀者推理,強(qiáng)調(diào)小說參與者之間形成一種動(dòng)態(tài)協(xié)作關(guān)系。 在小說交際中,作者(包括敘述者和人物)依據(jù)讀者的認(rèn)知體系做出期待性假設(shè),通過敘述者語(yǔ)言、小說故事、小說結(jié)構(gòu)和小說主題使該假設(shè)更加清晰。作者在各類語(yǔ)境中不僅建構(gòu)了抽象意義和語(yǔ)境意義,而且建構(gòu)了作者意義。這三種意義之間存在等級(jí)關(guān)系,處于最低層,即第一層為抽象意義(字面意義),第二層為語(yǔ)境意義(情景意義),第三層則為作者意義(敘述者意義和角色意義)。作者從低層到高層依次建構(gòu)意義,低層意義的建構(gòu)是高層意義建構(gòu)的途徑,高層意義的建構(gòu)是低層意義建構(gòu)的目的。 在小說交際中,讀者依靠明示刺激重構(gòu)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境并識(shí)別作者意圖,即讀者通過獲取語(yǔ)言知識(shí)、上下文知識(shí)、互文性知識(shí)、情景知識(shí)、背景知識(shí)和共有知識(shí)重構(gòu)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境;通過從低層到高層重構(gòu)抽象意義(字面意義)、語(yǔ)境意義(情景意義)和作者意義(敘述者意義和角色意義)從而識(shí)別作者意圖。 “小說交際語(yǔ)用分析模式”具有較強(qiáng)的實(shí)用價(jià)值。通過運(yùn)用該模式對(duì)Dorris Lessing的長(zhǎng)篇小說《金色筆記》進(jìn)行個(gè)案分析,我們認(rèn)為該模式具有合理性和有效性,為文學(xué)研究和語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究提供新的視角和研究方法。
[Abstract]:This paper is an interdisciplinary study. From the perspective of pragmatics, this paper puts forward a pragmatic analysis model of novel communication on the basis of relevance theory, which is based on the traditional literary theory and the less involved novel communication process in linguistics. Firstly, this paper systematically reviews the literature and linguistics studies on fiction, and points out that it is feasible to study novel communication from the perspective of pragmatics. Secondly, the relevance theory is used in literature research to make further reflection. Thirdly, it analyzes the participants of novel communication and the contextual knowledge in novel communication. Finally, on the basis of relevance theory, a pragmatic analysis model of novel communication is established in order to explain the construction and reconstruction of multiple meanings in the process of novel communication, that is, in the process of ostensive-inferential dynamic interpretation with text as the medium. Author (including narrator and character) constructs meaning and reader reconstructs meaning. The constituent elements of the pragmatic Analysis Model of novel Communication are the text, the participants of the novel communication, the context of the novel communication, the contextual knowledge of the author and the reader. The model puts forward the following views: the author has created the novel communication medium-text. The text world of narrator and character is created by the author. 2. The participants in the communication of the novel include not only the author and the reader, but also the writer and the reader. Moreover, the communication between narrator and character. 3. 3 the communication between the author and the reader is by the communication between the characters and the narrator and the reader. The diversity of communication determines the particularity of the communicative context of the novel. In the context of the author's creation of the novel, the context in which the reader reads the novel, the context in which the narrator tells the story and the language used by the characters in the novel, Both the author and the reader need to have contextual knowledge related to these four contexts. The contextual knowledge of authors and readers includes language knowledge, contextual knowledge, intertextuality knowledge, situational knowledge, background knowledge and common knowledge. The Model of communicative pragmatic Analysis emphasizes the explicit and reader reasoning of the author (including the narrator and the characters) and emphasizes the formation of a dynamic cooperative relationship between the participants of the novel. In novel communication, the author (including the narrator and the character) makes the expectation hypothesis according to the reader's cognitive system, which is made clearer by the narrator's language, the novel story, the novel structure and the novel theme. The author not only constructs abstract meaning and contextual meaning, but also constructs author meaning in various contexts. There is a hierarchical relationship between the three meanings, that is, the first level is abstract meaning (literal meaning), the second level is contextual meaning (situational meaning), the third level is author meaning (narrator meaning and role meaning). The author constructs the meaning from the lower level to the high level, and the construction of the lower meaning is the way of the construction of the high-level meaning, and the construction of the high-level meaning is the purpose of the low-level meaning construction. In the novel communication, the reader reconstructs the cognitive context and recognizes the author's intention through explicit stimulation, that is, the reader reconstructs the cognitive context by acquiring language knowledge, contextual knowledge, intertextuality knowledge, situational knowledge, background knowledge and common knowledge. By reconstructing abstract meaning (literal meaning), contextual meaning (situational meaning) and author meaning (narrator meaning and role meaning) from lower level to higher level, the author's intention can be recognized. The Model of pragmatic Analysis in novel Communication has strong practical value. Through a case study of Dorris Lessing's novel Golden Notebook, we find that the model is reasonable and effective and provides a new perspective and method for literary and linguistic studies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：I054

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 曹精華;“軍規(guī)”之詐——從語(yǔ)用學(xué)角度對(duì)Catch-22的文體分析[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;1995年03期

2 丁建民,嚴(yán)爽;《紅樓夢(mèng)》對(duì)話之語(yǔ)用模糊分析[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2002年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2081516