本文選題：家族題材小說 + 《財主底兒女們》��； 參考：《湖南師范大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 路翎是中國現(xiàn)代文學史上著名的作家之一,其作品《財主底兒女們》是中國現(xiàn)代文學史上一部非常有價值的長篇小說,它的出版被認為是中國新文學史上的一件重大的事件,小說被譽為是“五四以來中國知識分子感情和意志的百科全書”。費奧多爾·米哈伊洛維奇·陀思妥耶夫斯基是俄國19世紀最偉大的文學家之一,長篇小說《卡拉馬佐夫兄弟》是其最后一部作品。這部作品可以說是作者哲學思考的總結(jié),被稱為人類有文明歷史以來最為偉大的小說之 兩部小說成書年代不同,作家也處于不同的文化語境,然而,卻都是中俄文學史上不可多得具有史詩意義規(guī)模宏大的家族題材小說。家族具有對民族精神和歷史嬗變的“縮印”功能,兩部小說正是借助于凝聚著歷史變遷的家族這一社會基本單位,以家族的歷史,來突顯當時的社會史或民族史。同時,我們還看到,兩位作家具有相似的精神氣質(zhì),都善于在作品中挖掘人的靈魂,并對靈魂進行近乎殘酷的拷問。因此兩部作品都不僅能緊緊把握住時代的脈搏,而且對于知識分子的精神歸宿都展開了深刻的批判和審問,也正因為此,才使得這兩部家族題材作品的意義不止停留在史書似的記載,而更具有了人類精神史的偉大意義。論文從幾個層面展開對兩部作品的比較。 論文分為四個章節(jié)。首先,緒論概述中俄家族制度演進過程中的異同和兩部作品的時代背景,并且提出論文研究的意義和價值。在對中國宗法家族制度更加側(cè)重血緣關系和俄羅斯早期村社制度注重集體意識的比較中,闡述了中俄民族心理的差異性。在對論文的意義和價值綜述中,比較前人的研究成果,確立本論文的立新之處。 第二章論文具體比較作品中兩個家庭構(gòu)成的異同,通過常規(guī)家庭和偶然家庭的比較,闡述兩位作家不同選題的價值意義,并且通過具體分析作品中長輩——父親和母親形象,引出隨著“父親”意義的消逝、原有的家庭體系徹底崩潰的特征。 論文第三章節(jié)承上啟下,開始探討家族沒落之后,子女面對“失去父親”如何尋找精神皈依。此章節(jié)分兩部分,分類探討子女們面臨失去家園之后不同的抉擇：是寧靜的向傳統(tǒng)皈依、尋找精神之父,還是近乎瘋狂的尋求,走向曠野,在一粒麥子中得到救贖?這一章論文主要分析兩位作家是怎樣用近乎殘酷的筆觸,為我們展示了一個個主人公痛苦的精神世界。 論文第四章具有概述意義,以總結(jié)性、回答式的行文,闡釋兩位作家對于知識分子走出家庭之后歸屬的思考。兩位作家都看到,知識分子走向人民,才是唯一的出路,這也正體現(xiàn)了兩部作品的偉大思想意義,在人性拷問中挖掘人類精神的出路,雖然這個論題帶有難以闡述的深度復雜性,但是兩位作家都做了近乎痛苦與焦灼的探討。
[Abstract]:Lu Ling is one of the famous writers in the history of modern Chinese literature. His work, "the sons and daughters of the rich", is a very valuable novel in the history of modern Chinese literature. Its publication is considered to be an important event in the history of Chinese new literature. The novel is praised as an encyclopedia of Chinese intellectuals' feelings and will since the May 4th Movement. Fyodor Mikhilovich Dostoevsky is one of Russia's greatest writers in the 19th century. This work can be said to be a summary of the author's philosophical thinking. It is called one of the greatest novels in the history of civilization. But they are family novels of epic scale in the history of Chinese and Russian literature. The family has the function of "shrinking printing" to the national spirit and the historical evolution. The two novels highlight the social or national history of that time with the help of the family, the basic unit of society, which condenses the historical changes, and the history of the family. At the same time, we also see that the two writers have similar spiritual temperament, they are good at digging people's souls in their works, and torture the souls almost cruelly. Therefore, both works can not only grasp the pulse of the times, but also deeply criticize and question the spiritual fate of intellectuals, which is why, The significance of these two family works is not only recorded in historical books, but also of great significance in the history of human spirit. This paper compares the two works from several aspects. The paper is divided into four chapters. First of all, the introduction summarizes the similarities and differences in the evolution of the Sino-Russian family system and the background of the two works, and puts forward the significance and value of the research. In the comparison of the patriarchal clan system in China and the collective consciousness in the early Russian village community system, the differences of national psychology between China and Russia are expounded. In this paper, the significance and value of the review, compared with previous research results, the establishment of this paper new. The second chapter compares the similarities and differences of the two families in the works, through the comparison between the conventional family and the accidental family, expounds the value significance of the two writers' different topics, and analyzes the images of the elder-father and the mother in the works. As the meaning of "father" wanes, the original family system collapses completely. The third chapter begins to explore how children seek spiritual conversion in the face of "losing their father" after the decline of the family. This chapter, which is divided into two parts, explores the different choices of children facing loss of home: a quiet conversion to tradition, a search for the father of the spirit, or an almost frenzied search for salvation in the wilderness, in a grain of wheat? This chapter mainly analyzes how the two writers use their cruel strokes to show us the painful spiritual world of the protagonists. The fourth chapter of the thesis is of general significance, which explains the two writers' thinking about the intellectual's belonging after leaving the family. Both writers see that the only way out is for intellectuals to go to the people. This also reflects the great ideological significance of the two works and the way out for the human spirit to be excavated in the course of human torture. Despite the inexplicable depth of complexity of this thesis, both writers have made almost painful and anxious discussions.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：I106.4;I0-03

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 顏井春;;罪與救贖——由《卡拉馬佐夫兄弟》淺談陀思妥耶夫斯基的圣經(jīng)情結(jié)[J];安徽文學(下半月);2009年09期

2 呂新;論路翎小說中的“原始強力”精神[J];長春大學學報;2004年01期

3 陳h，

本文編號：2064207