本文選題：詩歌隱喻 + B-S-I模式��； 參考：《四川外語學院》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 隱喻一直以來都被認為是表達詩歌想象力和創(chuàng)造力的重要手段之一。詩人常常用隱喻來創(chuàng)造美,美化普通的或丑陋的事物,避免單調(diào)乏味。近年來,在眾多學者的努力下,特別是隨著認知語言學的迅速發(fā)展,詩歌和隱喻研究不斷的豐富和發(fā)展。但是人們對詩歌的研究,大都集中在美學和文化層面,較少從認知層面對詩歌的解讀過程進行分析;而對于隱喻的研究也主要集中在常規(guī)隱喻上,對詩歌隱喻關(guān)注較少。詩歌隱喻雖屬于隱喻的一種,但是和常規(guī)隱喻相比,又有它自身的新奇性、原創(chuàng)性和審美性,這些特征決定了不能把它和常規(guī)隱喻等同視之。因此,本文試圖在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,從認知心理學的角度建立一個整合模式去解讀中英詩歌中的隱喻,并試圖揭示隱藏在詩歌隱喻背后的人類語言理解機制。 本文首先比較了常規(guī)隱喻和詩歌隱喻的異同,然后分別分析了概念整合理論,相似原則和抑制機制在詩歌隱喻解讀中的作用以及它們各自的優(yōu)劣勢,在此基礎(chǔ)上創(chuàng)建了詩歌隱喻解讀的B-S-I模式,并將這一整合模式應(yīng)用到對各類詩歌隱喻的具體解讀過程中去。結(jié)合前人的分類,參照系統(tǒng)功能語言學對語言結(jié)構(gòu)的劃分,本文對詩歌隱喻從語音層、詞匯語法層以及語義層三個層面做了重新的劃分,這三大類還可以再分為更小的類。經(jīng)過分析,本文發(fā)現(xiàn)詩歌隱喻的理解過程是讀者在結(jié)合語言語境和背景知識的基礎(chǔ)上不斷激活、聯(lián)想、抑制和推理,最終獲得隱含意義的動態(tài)的過程。通過整合、映射、構(gòu)建以及其他的認知操作,如:相似原則和抑制機制,讀者就能推斷出比較合適的隱含意義。 該論文共有五個章節(jié),具體如下:第一章簡單介紹了論文寫作的動因、目標、以及論文的整體框架。第二章為文獻綜述部分,比較了常規(guī)隱喻和詩歌隱喻的異同,回顧了中西詩歌隱喻的發(fā)展歷程及研究動向,并詳細介紹了該論文的理論基礎(chǔ)。第三章分析了三大理論的優(yōu)勢和不足,并在此基礎(chǔ)上創(chuàng)建了詩歌隱喻解讀的整合模式。第四章先對詩歌隱喻進行了重新分類,然后通過運用構(gòu)建模式對具體詩歌隱喻的分析來揭示人類語言理解的機制。第五章為結(jié)束語�？偨Y(jié)了該論文的貢獻、不足以及對未來研究的一些建議。
[Abstract]:Metaphor has long been regarded as one of the most important ways to express poetic imagination and creativity. Poets often use metaphors to create beauty, beautify ordinary or ugly things and avoid monotony. In recent years, with the efforts of many scholars, especially with the rapid development of cognitive linguistics, the study of poetry and metaphor has been enriched and developed. However, most of the studies on poetry focus on aesthetics and culture, and less on the process of interpretation of poetry from the cognitive level. However, the study of metaphor is mainly focused on the conventional metaphor, and less on the metaphor of poetry. Although poetic metaphor is a kind of metaphor, it has its own novelty, originality and aesthetic characteristics compared with conventional metaphor. These characteristics make it impossible to equate it with conventional metaphor. Therefore, on the basis of previous studies, this paper attempts to establish an integrated model from the perspective of cognitive psychology to interpret metaphors in Chinese and English poetry. This paper first compares the similarities and differences between conventional metaphor and poetic metaphor, and then analyzes the conceptual integration theory. On the basis of the function of similarity principle and inhibition mechanism in the interpretation of poetry metaphor and their respective advantages and disadvantages, the B-S-I model of poetry metaphor interpretation is established. The integration model is applied to the concrete interpretation of various poetic metaphors. Combined with the previous classification and the classification of language structure in systemic functional linguistics, this paper reclassifies poetic metaphor from three levels: phonetic level, lexical and grammatical level and semantic level, which can be subdivided into smaller categories. Through analysis, it is found that the comprehension process of poetic metaphor is a dynamic process in which readers, on the basis of combining linguistic context and background knowledge, constantly activate, associate, suppress and infer, and finally obtain implicit meaning. Through integration, mapping, construction, and other cognitive operations, such as similarity principles and inhibition mechanisms, readers can infer more appropriate implicit meanings. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter briefly introduces the motivation, goal and the whole frame of the thesis. The second chapter is a literature review, which compares the similarities and differences between conventional metaphor and poetic metaphor, reviews the development and research trend of Chinese and Western poetic metaphors, and introduces the theoretical basis of this thesis in detail. The third chapter analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the three theories and establishes the integrated model of metaphor interpretation. The fourth chapter first reclassifies the metaphor of poetry and then reveals the mechanism of human language understanding by analyzing the specific metaphor of poetry by using the construction model. The fifth chapter is the conclusion. The contributions and shortcomings of this paper and some suggestions for future research are summarized.
【學位授予單位】：四川外語學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：I052

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王春梅;;關(guān)聯(lián)理論與詩歌隱喻探析[J];時代文學(下半月);2008年01期

2 曹麗英;周冬華;;認知視角下詩歌隱喻的功能研究[J];大眾文藝(理論);2009年22期

3 劉薇;;淺議漢語歌詞中隱喻的語言特色[J];雞西大學學報;2008年06期

4 王志堅;;詩歌隱喻類型及其功能[J];安陽師范學院學報;2008年06期

5 路翩翩;;論詩歌隱喻的認知意義[J];湖北第二師范學院學報;2008年04期

6 高新華;;基本概念隱喻與詩歌隱喻——從認知語言學視角對詩歌隱喻的解讀[J];通化師范學院學報;2010年03期

7 徐萍;;中英詩歌隱喻的認知新探[J];職業(yè)圈;2007年11期

8 顏靜;;“Oh Captain! My Captain!”的認知解讀[J];今日科苑;2008年24期

9 肖家燕;李恒威;;詩歌隱喻與詩歌主題的異化翻譯——《紅樓夢》詩歌英譯的認知語言學研究[J];紅樓夢學刊;2007年01期

10 趙濤;;從認知角度看周詞《六丑·正單衣試酒》中的隱喻[J];安徽文學(下半月);2007年10期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 簫引;詩性語言的精神[N];云南政協(xié)報;2000年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 王詩客;漢語新詩中祖國母親隱喻的多維度研究[D];浙江大學;2012年

2 肖家燕;《紅樓夢》概念隱喻的英譯研究[D];浙江大學;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 張星;詩歌隱喻的CMB模式解讀[D];四川外語學院;2012年

2 劉遠芳;從認知視角論詩歌隱喻的翻譯[D];河北師范大學;2011年

3 羅煒;關(guān)聯(lián)理論角度下李白詩歌隱喻的研究[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2010年

4 曹麗英;論詩歌隱喻的特點、分類及功能[D];湘潭大學;2005年

5 沈思;華萊士·史蒂文斯詩歌非理性特征研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學;2007年

6 王丹丹;英漢語詩歌中“愛情”隱喻的對比研究[D];廣西師范大學;2008年

7 周偉;隱喻在詩歌建構(gòu)和解讀中的認知功能[D];中國石油大學;2007年

8 葛洪波;英漢詩歌中愛情隱喻的對比研究[D];黑龍江大學;2010年

9 于瀟;中國古詩和現(xiàn)代詩中愛情隱喻的比較研究[D];沈陽師范大學;2013年

10 司廣新;論羅伯特·弗羅斯特詩歌的哲學特征[D];遼寧大學;2012年

，

本文編號：2006068