本文選題：關(guān)漢卿 + 莎士比亞��； 參考：《中南民族大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 中西文化的差異,以及時代的差異,必然會使關(guān)漢卿和莎士比亞的悲劇作品有所不同。關(guān)漢卿浸染在傳統(tǒng)的儒家思想文化之下,深受儒家思想的影響,另外,他所生活的時代,充滿了民族壓迫與欺凌,他的作品必然反映的是生活在社會底層的弱小的平民百姓所經(jīng)歷的苦難,以及他們對于苦難的抗?fàn)帯６勘葋喩畹臅r代正好是激情昂揚(yáng)的“伊麗莎白”時代,人文主義精神高漲、人們樂觀而積極,因此體現(xiàn)在莎士比亞筆下的必然是充滿英雄氣慨的偉大人物,他們不害怕失敗,即使生命不在,也無所畏懼。 本文以文本的解讀為基石,通過對關(guān)漢卿和莎士比亞悲劇作品中的悲劇人物、悲劇沖突、悲劇結(jié)局的比較研究來分析中西悲劇的異同。而研究的目的便是為了挖掘出具有中國特色的悲劇精神,來完善中國悲劇理論,也借此來反觀西方悲劇理論的缺失,以便通過相互反照來達(dá)到中西悲劇理論的互補(bǔ)。 論文主要分為四個部分展開論述,導(dǎo)言部分——簡要闡述關(guān)漢卿和莎士比亞悲劇比較研究的價值,簡介關(guān)漢卿和莎士比亞劇作研究現(xiàn)狀,以及本文研究方法。 第一章:關(guān)漢卿和莎士比亞悲劇人物的比較研究。本章主要從兩個方面來展開論述。(1)悲劇人物社會地位的差異性及其構(gòu)成環(huán)境:關(guān)漢卿劇作中的悲劇人物都是生活在平民社會里的卑微人物,莎士比亞劇作中的悲劇人物都是生活在宮廷里的高大人物。(2)悲劇人物命運(yùn)構(gòu)成方式的差異性及其不同的反抗形式:關(guān)漢卿劇作中的悲劇人物采取一種隱忍的態(tài)度來反抗命運(yùn)的不公,出現(xiàn)在莎士比亞筆下的偉大人物都是極力抗?fàn)帪?zāi)難。 第二章:關(guān)漢卿和莎士比亞悲劇沖突的比較研究。本章將圍繞悲劇起因、悲劇逆轉(zhuǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)、悲劇沖突解決的一致性三個方面來對中西悲劇沖突的差異性與共性進(jìn)行比較研究。(1)悲劇起因:莎士比亞悲劇源自于人性沖突,關(guān)漢卿悲劇源自于社會沖突。(2)悲劇逆轉(zhuǎn)結(jié)構(gòu):莎士比亞悲劇是由順轉(zhuǎn)入逆然后進(jìn)入死亡,關(guān)漢卿悲劇在最后的結(jié)局不是轉(zhuǎn)向?yàn)樗劳?而是進(jìn)入順境。(3)悲劇沖突解決的一致性——達(dá)到歷史與道德的進(jìn)步。 第三章:關(guān)漢卿和莎士比亞悲劇結(jié)局的比較研究。莎士比亞悲劇的結(jié)局帶給人的是靈魂的凈化作用,關(guān)漢卿悲劇結(jié)局則起著道義感化作用,兩者都起到了精神撫慰的作用。 結(jié)語,雖然中西悲劇在悲劇人物以及悲劇沖突的選擇上存有差異,但內(nèi)在的精神實(shí)質(zhì)是一樣的,都是給人以心靈撫慰。
[Abstract]:The differences between Chinese and Western cultures and times will inevitably make the tragic works of Guan Hanqing and Shakespeare different. Guan Hanqing was deeply influenced by the traditional Confucian ideology and culture. In addition, he lived in a time of national oppression and bullying. His works must reflect the suffering of the weak and ordinary people living at the bottom of the society and their struggle against it. Shakespeare lived in the era of passionate "Elizabeth", the humanism spirit is high, people are optimistic and positive, so it must be reflected in Shakespeare's works is full of heroic great people, They are not afraid of failure, even if life is gone, they are not afraid. Based on the interpretation of the text, this paper analyzes the similarities and differences between Chinese and Western tragedies through the comparative study of tragic characters, tragic conflicts and tragic outcomes in the tragic works of Guan Hanqing and Shakespeare. The purpose of the study is to excavate the tragic spirit with Chinese characteristics to perfect the Chinese tragic theory and to reverse the lack of the western tragic theory so as to achieve the complementarity of the Chinese and Western tragic theories through mutual reflection. The thesis is mainly divided into four parts, the introduction part briefly expounds the value of the comparative study of Guan Hanqing and Shakespeare's tragedy, introduces the present research situation of Guan Hanqing and Shakespeare's plays, and the research methods of this paper. Chapter one: a comparative study of Guan Hanqing and Shakespeare's tragic characters. This chapter mainly discusses the difference of the social status of the tragic characters and their composing environment from two aspects: all the tragic characters in Guan Hanqing's plays are humble figures living in the civilian society. The tragic characters in Shakespeare's plays are all high figures living in the court. (2) the difference of the destiny of the tragic characters and their different forms of resistance: the tragic characters in Guan Hanqing's plays adopt a tolerant attitude To resist the injustice of fate, The great men who appear in Shakespeare's works are all struggling against disaster. Chapter two: a comparative study of the conflict between Guan Hanqing and Shakespeare. This chapter makes a comparative study of the differences and commonalities of the tragic conflicts between China and the West from three aspects: the causes of tragedy, the structure of tragedy reversal, and the consistency of the settlement of tragic conflicts: Shakespeare's tragedy originates from the conflict of human nature. The tragedy of Guan Hanqing originates from the social conflict.) the reverse structure of tragedy: Shakespeare's tragedy is from descending to reverse and then to death, and Guan Hanqing's tragedy in the end is not turned to death. It is the consistency of the settlement of tragic conflicts-to achieve the progress of history and morality. Chapter three: a comparative study of the tragic ending of Guan Hanqing and Shakespeare. Shakespeare's tragic ending brings the purification of soul, while Guan Hanqing's tragic ending plays a moral role, both of which play a spiritual soothing role. In conclusion, although there are differences in the choice of tragic characters and tragic conflicts between Chinese and Western tragedies, the inner spiritual essence is the same, which is to soothe the soul.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：I0-03;I106

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 付云;論莎士比亞和關(guān)漢卿戲劇中的浪漫主義風(fēng)格[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王光文;中國古典文學(xué)的悲劇精神[D];南京師范大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 葉毓;中西悲劇結(jié)局之比較研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2005年

2 邵芳菲;中西古典悲劇藝術(shù)性格比較[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1985850