本文選題：克塞諾法尼斯 + 萊舍　； 參考：《西南交通大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：克塞諾法尼斯是古希臘思想史上由詩教傳統(tǒng)轉向哲學傳統(tǒng)的關鍵人物,深入認識克塞諾法尼斯現(xiàn)存的一百一十八行詩歌不但對理解古希臘思想史有著重要的意義,甚至對于理解歐美文化中的某些方面都極其重要,如對哲學是在批判詩教傳統(tǒng)的基礎上建立起來的,知識觀念的確立,一神論與多神論的原始沖突等問題的把握,都在克塞諾法尼斯那里有不同程度的反映。本文分為翻譯和義疏兩大部分,第一部分翻譯包括萊舍《科洛封的克塞諾法尼斯殘篇——文本、翻譯及評注》一書中克塞諾法尼斯殘篇的注釋和闡釋部分的漢譯本和克塞諾法尼斯殘篇古希臘原文的漢譯本;義疏部分是建立在對克塞諾法尼斯殘篇原文的翻譯之上進行的,試圖通過詳細解讀克塞諾法尼斯的殘篇,深入理解文本所涉及的各種基本問題。且根據作品本身所呈現(xiàn)的主題將其殘篇分為道德觀、神論、論自然和認識論四個部分�？巳Z法尼斯的學說主要是以神以及與神相關的問題作為主題研究的,因此,道德觀、論自然、認識論這三個主題都與神論有著密不可分的聯(lián)系。他批判人類把自己的可恥行為加注在神身上,這不僅僅是對傳統(tǒng)神話的批判,更多是告訴聽眾們傳統(tǒng)神話中錯誤的道德觀。這些都與克塞諾法尼斯道德有關殘篇的主張不謀而合;他還從認識論的角度提出人對神的認識問題;他認為他的新神掌握著真理,但這個新神并沒有告訴人類真理是什么,克塞諾法尼斯認為人類是通過探索一步一步無限接近真理的。另外,克塞諾法尼斯在論述自然現(xiàn)象時也是建立在批判傳統(tǒng)神話的基礎上的,他是通過談論自然現(xiàn)象從而抨擊傳統(tǒng)神話的。克塞諾法尼斯這樣做正是在教育他的聽眾們應該擺脫傳統(tǒng)神話禁錮,進而對自然現(xiàn)象有一個正確的認識。
[Abstract]:Kessenovannis is the key figure in the history of ancient Greek thought from the tradition of poetry to the tradition of philosophy. It is not only of great significance to understand the history of ancient Greek thought to deeply understand the existing 118 lines of poetry, but also to understand the history of ancient Greek thought. It is even extremely important to understand certain aspects of European and American culture, such as the establishment of philosophy on the basis of criticizing the tradition of poetry and teaching, the establishment of knowledge concepts, the primitive conflict between monotheism and polytheism, and so on. There are varying degrees of reflection in Kessenofannis. This thesis is divided into two parts: translation and semantic translation. The first part of translation includes Kessenofanis' residual text by Lech Krovonne. "Translation and commentary." A Chinese translation of the annotated and interpreted parts of the remnant passage of Kessenofannis and a Chinese translation of the original Greek text of the remnant of Kessenovannis; the meaning and thinning part is based on the translation of the original text of the remnant text of the Cessenofacannis. This paper attempts to understand the basic problems involved in the text by interpreting the remains of Kessenovannis in detail. According to the theme of the work itself, it is divided into four parts: morality, theology, nature and epistemology. Kessenofannis' theory mainly focuses on God and the problems related to God. Therefore, the three themes of morality, theory of nature and epistemology are closely related to theology. He criticized mankind for placing his shameful behavior on God, which was not only a critique of traditional mythology, but also a misconception of morality in traditional mythology. It all coincides with the idea of a broken piece of Kessenovannis' morality; he also raises the question of man's understanding of God from an epistemological point of view; he thinks that his new god holds the truth, but the new god does not tell mankind what the truth is, Kessenovannis believes that human beings are infinitely close to the truth by exploring one step at a time. In addition, Kessenofannis is also based on criticizing traditional mythology when he discusses natural phenomena. He criticizes traditional myths by talking about natural phenomena. By doing so, Kessenovannis is educating his listeners to get rid of traditional mythology and to have a correct understanding of natural phenomena.
【學位授予單位】：西南交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H791.1;I046
，

本文編號：1878207