發(fā)布時間：2018-04-29 04:01

  本文選題：后理論 + 理論的終結�。� 參考：《四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：近二十年來,隨著“理論終結”的聲音被傳遞到中國,后理論研究漸成學界熱點話題。人們似乎普遍認為理論在西方大勢已去,中國的理論研究者也必須重新檢視我們在過去追隨西方理論話語的得失,一方面為國內理論研究謀求新的發(fā)展方向,同時也為中國文論的國際化尋找契機。國內后理論研究主要可被劃分為五個話題,包括什么是理論、理論是否已經終結、如何克服文學研究或理論的危機、后理論時代的理論走向以及中國文論國際化等。對現(xiàn)有成果的綜合考察可以為國內文學理論的研究和未來走向提供思路。其實,無論是倡導推進文化研究還是回歸文本分析,是繼續(xù)理論的政治化還是回歸學術本位,都是把理論進行下去的不同方式,都是在深化理論的反思行為、補偏救弊,讓它更好地適應變化了的文學與社會現(xiàn)實。
[Abstract]:In the past twenty years, with the sound of "theory ending" being transmitted to China, post-theoretical research has gradually become a hot topic in academic circles. It seems that there is a general belief that theories have gone by in the West, and that Chinese theoretical researchers must also re-examine the gains and losses of the western theoretical discourse in the past and, on the one hand, seek a new direction of development for domestic theoretical research. At the same time, it also seeks the opportunity for the internationalization of Chinese literary theory. Domestic post-theoretical research can be divided into five main topics, including what is theory, whether the theory has ended, how to overcome the crisis of literary research or theory, the theoretical trend of the post-theoretical era and the internationalization of Chinese literary theory. The comprehensive investigation of the existing achievements can provide ideas for the study of domestic literary theory and the future trend. In fact, whether advocating the promotion of cultural research or returning to text analysis, continuing the politicization of the theory or returning to the academic standard are all different ways of carrying out the theory. They are all deepening the reflective behavior of the theory and making up for the shortcomings. Let it better adapt to the changing literature and social reality.
，

本文編號：1818278