本文選題：錢谷融 + “文學(xué)是人學(xué)”�。� 參考：《河南師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)50年代,錢谷融提出“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”的人道主義文學(xué)思想,對中國現(xiàn)代文藝史的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的意義。但是由于當(dāng)時(shí)特殊時(shí)代環(huán)境的影響,“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”的發(fā)展幾經(jīng)沉浮。本文試圖通過對導(dǎo)致其理論沉浮變化的社會(huì)政治背景的整體考察,旨在對錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”思想的價(jià)值及當(dāng)代意義進(jìn)行較為系統(tǒng)全面的研究。第一章主要介紹錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”理論的提出及理論內(nèi)涵。本章通過探析錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”理論的提出始末,從關(guān)于文學(xué)的任務(wù)、關(guān)于作家的世界觀與創(chuàng)作方法、關(guān)于評價(jià)文學(xué)作品的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、關(guān)于各種創(chuàng)作方法的區(qū)別,關(guān)于人的典型性與階級性五個(gè)方面論述錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”的理論內(nèi)涵,闡釋“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”觀點(diǎn)對我國古代傳統(tǒng)思想及近現(xiàn)代學(xué)術(shù)資源中人學(xué)思想的繼承與發(fā)展。第二章主要探索錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”理論的沉寂。《論“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”》的產(chǎn)生及其沉浮與中國文學(xué)所處的整體社會(huì)氛圍密不可分,本章通過追溯文藝界反右運(yùn)動(dòng)擴(kuò)大化,八屆十中全會(huì)對文藝的否定與控制和文化大革命等社會(huì)背景,闡發(fā)由于國內(nèi)和國際政治環(huán)境的影響,學(xué)界對錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”思想的猛烈批判,并從文學(xué)界對該命題學(xué)理邏輯、生態(tài)文藝角度的質(zhì)疑及理論提出者的爭論,體現(xiàn)了錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”思想在當(dāng)代中國文藝史上經(jīng)歷的坎坷歷程。第三章主要探討錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”理論的復(fù)蘇�！半p百方針”的提出為《論“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”》提供了適宜的政治氣候,在文藝政策的“調(diào)整”與“糾偏”和第四次全國文代會(huì)與作協(xié)第四次會(huì)議的影響下,“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”的命題重提并再度高揚(yáng),受到社會(huì)各界,特別是哲學(xué)、人文社會(huì)科學(xué)界、文藝界的普遍關(guān)注和重視,并通過巴人對“人情”的呼喚,王淑明的“人情論”以及蔣孔陽的“第三種文藝論”等同時(shí)代作家人學(xué)思想上的覺醒展現(xiàn)對錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”理論的呼應(yīng)與聲援。第四章主要闡釋錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”理論的價(jià)值與影響。在20世紀(jì)中國現(xiàn)代文學(xué)史和思想史關(guān)于“人的文學(xué)”的歷史脈絡(luò)中,錢谷融的“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”理論具有承上啟下的歷史價(jià)值,啟發(fā)了后世的文學(xué)創(chuàng)作,對后代文學(xué)的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了極大的影響,同時(shí)針對文學(xué)終結(jié)論表明錢谷融的“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”命題不僅不會(huì)過時(shí),并且在當(dāng)代還將具有新的意義。
[Abstract]:In the 1950's, Qian Gurong put forward the humanitarianism literary thought of "literature is human science", which had profound significance to the development of Chinese modern literature and art history.But because of the influence of the special time environment, the development of "Literature is Man" has been ups and downs several times.This paper attempts to make a systematic and comprehensive study on the value and contemporary significance of Qian Gurong's thought of "Literature is a Man" through the overall investigation of the social and political background that led to the ups and downs of his theory.The first chapter mainly introduces Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Man" and its connotation.By analyzing Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Human", this chapter starts with the task of literature, the writer's world outlook and creative methods, the criteria of evaluating literary works, and the differences of various creative methods.This paper discusses the theoretical connotation of Qian Gurong's theory of "literature is human studies" from five aspects of human typicality and class nature, and expounds the inheritance and development of the viewpoint of "literature is human studies" to the ancient Chinese traditional thought and the modern academic resources.The second chapter mainly explores the silence of Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Human". [on the emergence and ups and downs of "Literature is Human" is inseparable from the overall social atmosphere of Chinese literature, this chapter is expanded by tracing back to the anti-right movement of literary and art circles.The 10th Plenary session of the eighth CPC Central Committee criticized Qian Gurong's thought of "Literature as a Man" because of the influence of domestic and international political environment on the social background, such as the negation and control of literature and art and the Cultural Revolution.And from the theoretical logic of the proposition, the ecological literature and art angle and the argument of the theoretical proponents, it reflects the rough course of Qian Gurong's thought of "Literature is Man" in the contemporary Chinese literature and art history.The third chapter mainly discusses the revival of Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Man".The proposal of "double hundred principles" provides a suitable political climate for "Literature is the study of Man". Under the influence of the "adjustment" and "correction" of literary and artistic policies and the fourth meeting of the National Association of Literary dynasties and Writers' Associations,The proposition of "Literature is the study of Man" is raised again and again, and it has received widespread attention and attention from all walks of life, especially philosophy, humanities and social science, literary and art circles, and through the call of the Ba people to "human feelings".The awakening of contemporary writers such as Wang Shuming's "human feeling theory" and Jiang Kongyang's "third theory of literature and art" reveals the echo and solidarity with Qian Gurong's theory of "literature is human studies".The fourth chapter mainly explains the value and influence of Qian Gurong's theory of "Literature is Man".In the history of modern Chinese literature and ideological history in the 20th century, Qian Gurong's theory of "literature is human" has the historical value of connecting with the past and the following, and has inspired the literary creation of later generations.It has a great influence on the development of future generations' literature. At the same time, the conclusion of literature shows that Qian Gurong's proposition of "literature is human studies" is not only not out of date, but also has new significance in contemporary times.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王雪瑛;;文學(xué)的魅力是什么——專訪著名文藝?yán)碚摷义X谷融[J];中國文藝評論;2016年05期

2 朱立元;;“文學(xué)終結(jié)論”的中國之旅[J];中國文學(xué)批評;2016年01期

3 許見軍;;“十七年文學(xué)”中的錢谷融[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2016年01期

4 許見軍;殷國明;;一九五七年中的錢谷融——《論“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”》學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值及其發(fā)生考察[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇;2015年12期

5 賴大仁;;當(dāng)代文學(xué)本質(zhì)論觀念嬗變的“人學(xué)”向度[J];中州學(xué)刊;2015年03期

6 許麗;劉鋒杰;;“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”:突圍策略與一體兩面[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2015年03期

7 王爽;;“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”的審美文化學(xué)解讀[J];河北聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

8 盧亞明;靖志茹;馬晶晶;;錢谷融的人學(xué)話語與新時(shí)期文論建構(gòu)[J];保定學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期

9 杜梁;;“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”的現(xiàn)代闡釋[J];求是學(xué)刊;2014年03期

10 趙洪濤;;“文學(xué)死了”:一個(gè)關(guān)系判斷而不是價(jià)值判斷的論調(diào)[J];文藝評論;2014年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前7條

1 錢谷融;;文學(xué)是人學(xué)，，藝術(shù)也是人生[N];文匯報(bào);2016年

2 舒晉瑜;;錢谷融:我的論調(diào)從來沒變過[N];中華讀書報(bào);2014年

3 馬信芳;;為文學(xué)“正名”一輩子[N];深圳特區(qū)報(bào);2014年

4 朱立元;;“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”命題的強(qiáng)大生命力[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2013年

5 ;生態(tài)批評:顛覆“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”[N];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院報(bào);2008年

6 童慶炳;;“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”新論[N];學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)報(bào);2002年

7 魯樞元;;“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”的再探討[N];文藝報(bào);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 張荃;錢谷融“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”思想探析[D];蘇州大學(xué);2013年

2 郭瓊;“文學(xué)是人學(xué)”文藝觀的生態(tài)學(xué)維度[D];山東理工大學(xué);2013年

3 劉孝團(tuán);錢谷融之文學(xué)批評[D];牡丹江師范學(xué)院;2011年

4 金錢偉;文學(xué)是人學(xué)的審美回歸—錢谷融文藝思想研究[D];西北民族大學(xué);2011年

5 夏偉;學(xué)術(shù)與人生：錢谷融情懷解讀[D];華東師范大學(xué);2009年

6 朱樂懿;人道主義的守望者[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：1765865