本文選題：世紀(jì)年代　切入點(diǎn)：文學(xué)與政治關(guān)系　出處：《學(xué)術(shù)交流》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)30年代發(fā)生在左聯(lián)作家和自由主義文學(xué)家之間的著名文藝自由論辯,反映了中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化中"文以載道"的經(jīng)世致用文學(xué)思想、歐洲人道主義和啟蒙主義以及馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚搶?duì)30年代文學(xué)與政治關(guān)系的影響。同時(shí),文學(xué)政治化和工具化給整個(gè)20世紀(jì)帶來了歷史影響:這種趨勢(shì)配合革命浪潮,反對(duì)國(guó)民黨的文學(xué)專制,宣傳革命思想,開闊作家創(chuàng)作題材和精神世界,但同時(shí)也有許多負(fù)面影響,如政治審美代替文學(xué)審美,把文學(xué)作為宣傳工具導(dǎo)致作品的藝術(shù)水平下降,并在20世紀(jì)很長(zhǎng)的一段時(shí)間內(nèi)鉗制了文學(xué)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In 1930s, the famous literary and artistic freedom debate between the Left-League writers and liberalism writers reflected the literary thought of "using literature to carry the Tao" in Chinese traditional culture. The influence of European humanitarianism and Marxist literary theory on the relationship between literature and politics in 30s. At the same time, the politicization and instrumentalization of literature had a historical impact on the whole of 20th century: this trend coincided with the tide of revolution. Opposing the Kuomintang's literary autocracy, propagating revolutionary ideas, and broadening the writers' subject matter and spiritual world, however, there are also many negative influences, such as political aesthetics replacing literary aesthetics, using literature as a propaganda tool, leading to a decline in the artistic level of the works. And in 20th century a long period of time to curb the development of literature.
【作者單位】： 首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)文化與傳播學(xué)院;臺(tái)灣藝術(shù)大學(xué)藝術(shù)管理與文化政策研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 葛紅兵;胡秋原、蘇汶的文藝自由論[J];益陽師專學(xué)報(bào);1996年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1565780