本文關(guān)鍵詞： 新理性精神 新人文精神 現(xiàn)代性 交往對(duì)話　出處：《江西師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 在上世紀(jì)90年代,面對(duì)當(dāng)時(shí)文學(xué)欲望化、消費(fèi)化與平面化的不良傾向,錢中文、許明等人文知識(shí)分子接續(xù)著九十年代“人文精神大討論”的思想星火,提出了“新理性精神文學(xué)論”,旨在以文學(xué)的“新理性精神”來療救文學(xué)的病癥,重建文學(xué)藝術(shù)的思想之根,以引導(dǎo)文學(xué)走向積極健康的現(xiàn)代性之路。 本文認(rèn)為,“新理性精神”揚(yáng)棄了西方思想啟蒙以來的各種理性主義思潮和尼采、叔本華等為代表的非理性及反理性主義思潮,批判地繼承了中外人文精神中的重要思想資源,脫胎而出,構(gòu)建起自身的理論體系。本文在回顧“新理性精神”的思想來源和時(shí)代背景的前提下,圍繞“新理性精神”的三個(gè)理論維度:以“新人文精神”為核心和血肉、以“現(xiàn)代性”為指導(dǎo)、以“交往對(duì)話”為思維方式,重點(diǎn)闡釋了各自的理論內(nèi)涵和彼此的邏輯關(guān)聯(lián),并強(qiáng)調(diào)指出“新理性精神”是以我為主導(dǎo)基礎(chǔ)上的一種對(duì)人類一切有價(jià)值東西實(shí)行兼容并包的、開放的實(shí)踐理性。 本文指出“新理性精神”與文學(xué)理論融合生成的“新理性精神文學(xué)論”秉持了馬克思主義人學(xué)的基本立場(chǎng)和唯物史觀的基本原則,辯證地整合了馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)的美學(xué)觀點(diǎn)和歷史觀點(diǎn),吸收了新時(shí)期以來關(guān)于文學(xué)審美特性的論爭(zhēng)和九十年代“人文精神大討論”的思想成果,融合了西方的文學(xué)“現(xiàn)代性”理論和“交往對(duì)話”理論,是一種宏觀、綜合、立體、創(chuàng)新的當(dāng)代文論形態(tài),具有強(qiáng)烈的現(xiàn)實(shí)性、批判性和學(xué)理性。 “新理性精神”的提出在學(xué)術(shù)界產(chǎn)生了較大反響,本文站在客觀公允的立場(chǎng)上,對(duì)“新理性精神”引發(fā)的討論進(jìn)行了觀照和梳理,探討了爭(zhēng)論的意義,總結(jié)出討論所取得的成果,以及可能存在的不足,力求為今后的研究提供有益的借鑒。本文在此基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步超越出來,將“新理性精神文學(xué)論”置放在當(dāng)代中國(guó)文論和文學(xué)發(fā)展的整體視野中加以觀審,分析了“新理性精神文學(xué)論”對(duì)當(dāng)代文論建設(shè)和當(dāng)代文學(xué)健康發(fā)展的指導(dǎo)性意義。
[Abstract]:In -10s, in the face of the undesirable tendency of literary desire, consumption and planarization, Qian Zhongwen, Xu Ming and other humanistic intellectuals followed the "great discussion of humanistic spirit" in 90s. This paper puts forward the "New rational Spirit Literature Theory", which aims to cure the disease of literature with "new rational spirit" of literature, reconstruct the ideological root of literature and art, and guide literature to a positive and healthy road of modernity. This paper argues that the "New rational Spirit" sublate all kinds of rationalism and irrational and anti-rationalist thoughts represented by Nietzsche and Schopenhauer since the Enlightenment of Western thought. It critically inherits the important ideological resources of Chinese and foreign humanism spirit, emerges from birth and constructs its own theoretical system. This paper reviews the ideological source and the background of the times of "New rational Spirit". Around the three theoretical dimensions of "New rational Spirit": "New Humanities Spirit" as the core and flesh and blood, "modernity" as the guidance, "Communication and Dialogue" as the mode of thinking. This paper mainly explains the theoretical connotation of each other and their logical connection, and points out that the "new rational spirit" is a kind of inclusive inclusion of all valuable things of human being based on the "new rational spirit". Open practical rationality. This paper points out that the "New rational Spirit Literature Theory", which is formed by the fusion of "New rational Spirit" and literary theory, upholds the basic stand of Marxist humanism and the basic principles of historical materialism. It dialectically integrates the aesthetic and historical viewpoints of Marxist literary criticism, and absorbs the debate on the aesthetic characteristics of literature since the new period and the ideological achievements of the "Great discussion on Humanistic Spirit" in 90s. The theory of "modernity" and "communication and dialogue" of western literature is a kind of macroscopic, comprehensive, three-dimensional and innovative contemporary literary theory, which has strong reality, criticism and academic rationality. The proposal of "New rational Spirit" has produced a great reaction in the academic circles. This paper, from an objective and fair standpoint, reviews and combs the discussion caused by "New rational Spirit", and probes into the significance of the controversy. Summary of the results of the discussion, as well as possible shortcomings, and strive to provide useful reference for future research. On the basis of this, this paper further surmounts. The "New rational spiritual Literature Theory" is placed in the overall view of the development of contemporary Chinese literary theory and literature. This paper analyzes the guiding significance of New rational spiritual Literature for the construction of contemporary literary theory and the healthy development of contemporary literature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋建林;對(duì)“人文精神”討論的反思[J];北京社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年02期

2 劉坤媛;;“新理性精神”及其現(xiàn)代意義[J];長(zhǎng)白學(xué)刊;2006年03期

3 朱立元;孫士聰;劉凱;;試論新時(shí)期以來中國(guó)文藝學(xué)的大發(fā)展[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

4 常月仙;;提升精神的求索——錢中文的“新理性精神文學(xué)論”評(píng)析[J];創(chuàng)作評(píng)譚;2005年06期

5 楊春時(shí);文學(xué)研究與新理性精神——主持人的話[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2002年02期

6 錢中文;新理性精神與文學(xué)理論[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2002年02期

7 童慶炳;新理性精神與文化詩學(xué)[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2002年02期

8 王元驤;“新理性精神”之我見[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2002年02期

9 徐岱;“新理性精神”與后形而上詩學(xué)[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2002年02期

10 高瑞泉 ,袁進(jìn) ,張汝倫 ,李天綱;人文精神尋蹤[J];讀書;1994年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 本報(bào)記者　杜悅;[N];中國(guó)教育報(bào);2003年

2 李明歡;[N];文藝報(bào);2000年

3 胡經(jīng)之;[N];中華讀書報(bào);2002年

4 （中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院文學(xué)研究所）　　錢中文;[N];中華讀書報(bào);2002年

，

本文編號(hào)：1477624