本文關(guān)鍵詞：數(shù)字媒介時(shí)代文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題研究　出處：《中南大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 文藝學(xué)邊界 學(xué)理原點(diǎn) 位移 重建

【摘要】： 文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題是自本世紀(jì)以來(lái)文藝學(xué)研究的熱點(diǎn)之一。本文以數(shù)字媒介時(shí)代為背景,分析研究文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題自提出到爭(zhēng)論多樣化的發(fā)展過(guò)程,在了解了文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題的幾種重要觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上,分析了文藝學(xué)邊界的變化對(duì)文藝學(xué)學(xué)理原點(diǎn)的影響并概述了文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題的意義與局限。本文主體共分三部分。 第一部分首先介紹了文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題的提出。希利斯·米勒在中國(guó)提出的“文化終結(jié)論”成為了我國(guó)學(xué)界對(duì)文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題研究的導(dǎo)索,在對(duì)文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題的不斷論爭(zhēng)中,老一輩學(xué)者與中青年學(xué)者的看法有所不同,主要形成了積極開(kāi)放文藝學(xué)的研究邊界、堅(jiān)守文學(xué)理論的審美場(chǎng)域以及在一定前提下適度開(kāi)放文藝學(xué)邊界等的幾種觀點(diǎn)。本文認(rèn)為,在各種觀點(diǎn)的背后,實(shí)質(zhì)卻是文藝學(xué)的話語(yǔ)權(quán)爭(zhēng)奪和文藝學(xué)學(xué)科本身對(duì)新的發(fā)展空間的尋求。 第二部分主要分析了文藝學(xué)邊界的變化對(duì)文藝學(xué)學(xué)理原點(diǎn)的影響。由于文藝學(xué)學(xué)理原點(diǎn)具有相對(duì)穩(wěn)定性和不確定性,因此文藝學(xué)邊界的變化必然會(huì)對(duì)文藝學(xué)的學(xué)理原點(diǎn)造成影響。本文將位移前后進(jìn)行對(duì)比,闡述了文學(xué)是什么、文學(xué)寫(xiě)什么、文學(xué)怎么寫(xiě)、文學(xué)干什么這四個(gè)學(xué)理基點(diǎn)在文藝學(xué)邊界變化的影響所發(fā)生的位移。 第三部分則是總結(jié)了文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題對(duì)文藝學(xué)學(xué)科和文學(xué)研究的意義與局限。本文認(rèn)為,對(duì)文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題的論爭(zhēng)就是在對(duì)文藝學(xué)進(jìn)行深入思考,而論爭(zhēng)的觀點(diǎn)越是多樣化,就越能促進(jìn)文學(xué)理論民主化,文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題的論爭(zhēng)就是對(duì)文學(xué)理論更進(jìn)一步貼近現(xiàn)實(shí)所做出的努力;另外,對(duì)文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題的論爭(zhēng),也會(huì)出現(xiàn)將邊界本質(zhì)主義化并將邊界兩邊的內(nèi)容二元對(duì)立化等的局限。
[Abstract]:The boundary problem of literature and art has been one of the hotspots of literature and art research since this century. This paper takes the digital media era as the background to analyze the development process of the boundary problem of literature and art from the point of view of the argument and diversification. On the basis of understanding several important points of view on the boundary problem of literature and art. This paper analyzes the influence of the change of the boundary of literature and art on the origin of the theory of literature and art and outlines the significance and limitation of the boundary of literature and art. The main body of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the boundary problem of literature and art. The theory of the end of Culture proposed by Hillis Miller in China has become the guide to the study of the boundary of literature and art in our country. In the constant debate on the boundary of literature and art, the older generation of scholars and young scholars have different views, mainly formed an active and open research boundary of literature and art. Adhere to the aesthetic field of literary theory and open the boundaries of literature and art in a certain premise. This paper believes that behind all kinds of views. The essence is the scramble for the discourse power of literature and art and the search for new development space of literature and art itself. The second part mainly analyzes the influence of the change of the boundary of literature and art on the origin of theory of literature and art, because of the relative stability and uncertainty of the origin of theory of literature and art. Therefore, the change of the boundary of literature and art will inevitably have an impact on the origin of literature and art. This paper compares the displacement before and after, and expounds what literature is, what literature writes, and how literature is written. The displacement of the four basic points of literature in the influence of the change of literature and art boundary. The third part summarizes the significance and limitation of the boundary of literature and art to the study of literature and art. The more diverse the viewpoints, the more the democratization of literary theory. The controversy on the boundary of literature and art is an effort to bring literary theory closer to reality. In addition, the controversy on the boundary of literature and art will bring about the limitation of the boundary essentialism and the dualism of the contents on both sides of the boundary.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王見(jiàn)楠;;越界與堅(jiān)守——“文學(xué)研究的文化轉(zhuǎn)向”問(wèn)題綜述[J];淮陰師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 董麗華;數(shù)字媒介時(shí)代文藝學(xué)邊界問(wèn)題研究[D];中南大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1423948