本文關(guān)鍵詞：對中國當(dāng)代藝術(shù)后殖民化的思考　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 中國當(dāng)代藝術(shù) 后殖民主義 后殖民化 本土化

【摘要】： 中文提要:“后殖民化”一直是中國當(dāng)代藝術(shù)受批判最多,爭論聲最響的問題,也成為中國當(dāng)代藝術(shù)發(fā)展最大的障礙。批評家們一致指責(zé)西方文化侵略,但指責(zé)不能發(fā)展當(dāng)代藝術(shù),不能解決文化侵略問題,重新審視“后殖民主義”,尋找造成中國當(dāng)代藝術(shù)“后殖民化”的真正“元兇”,更正自身問題才能最終得到發(fā)展。 本文首先分析了中國的特殊國情,認(rèn)為薩伊德的《東方學(xué)》觀點(diǎn)并不完全適合中國。之后又通過對中國民族自信心缺失、自我身份認(rèn)同錯位、“本土”文化斷層、藝術(shù)體制、過度商業(yè)化、中國當(dāng)代藝術(shù)教育等問題的分析,揭示了在中國這個沒有殖民化背景的國家當(dāng)代藝術(shù)出現(xiàn)“后殖民化”的真正根源。
[Abstract]:Abstract: "Post-colonization" has always been the most criticized and controversial issue in Chinese contemporary art, and has also become the biggest obstacle to the development of Chinese contemporary art. Critics have unanimously accused the Western culture of aggression. However, he criticized that he could not develop contemporary art, could not solve the problem of cultural aggression, re-examine "post-colonialism", and look for the real "culprit" who caused the "post-colonization" of Chinese contemporary art. Only by correcting our own problems can we finally develop. This paper first analyzes the special national conditions of China and thinks that Saeed's "Orientalism" view is not entirely suitable for China. Then through the lack of confidence in the Chinese nation, self-identity dislocation. "Native" cultural fault, art system, excessive commercialization, Chinese contemporary art education and other issues. It reveals the real root of post-colonization in contemporary art in a country with no background of colonization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：J124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 顏敏;“東方學(xué)”與“西方學(xué)”——讀薩義德《東方學(xué)》[J];湘潭大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年04期

，

本文編號：1409810