本文關(guān)鍵詞：激進(jìn)與保守在“哲學(xué)門”相遇　出處：《文藝研究》2017年11期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 哲學(xué)門 傅斯年 顧頡剛 胡適 文學(xué)史寫作 王國維 科學(xué)研究機(jī)構(gòu) 羅振玉 考據(jù)學(xué) 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力量

【摘要】：激進(jìn)與保守之"結(jié)",既是中國學(xué)術(shù)之"結(jié)",也是中國人的思想之"結(jié)"。二者如影隨行,相互依存。為創(chuàng)造新文化打下哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)的王國維,在想做詩人、哲人的歧路上,遇到堅(jiān)守本土文化的羅振玉,轉(zhuǎn)向傳統(tǒng)的"樸學(xué)"研究,最終以詩詞了情,哲思絕命。胡適的哲學(xué)史課,把北大國學(xué)程度最深而且具有領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力量的傅斯年、顧頡剛從舊派教授的陣營中爭取過來。隨后,傅斯年上書蔡元培要求將哲學(xué)歸入理科,并"教條"地將文學(xué)、哲學(xué)排斥在中央研究院這個(gè)最高科學(xué)研究機(jī)構(gòu)之外。激進(jìn)的學(xué)術(shù)領(lǐng)袖胡適,聽王國維談?wù)摯髡鹬?開始關(guān)注清代學(xué)術(shù),以至于最后二十年放棄哲學(xué)史、文學(xué)史寫作,轉(zhuǎn)向純粹的考據(jù)學(xué)。
[Abstract]:Radical and conservative "knot" is not only the "knot" of Chinese academic, but also the "knot" of Chinese thought. They are accompanied by shadow and interdependent. Wang Guowei, who laid the philosophical foundation for the creation of new culture, wants to be a poet. On the different road of the philosophers, Luo Zhenyu, who clung to the local culture, turned to the traditional study of "Park Learning", and finally, with the poetry, the philosophy thought was doomed. Hu Shi's philosophy history lesson. Fu Sinian, who had the deepest level of national studies and the leading power in Peking University, was won by Gu Jiegang from the old school of professors. Subsequently, Fu Sinian wrote to Cai Yuanpei requesting that philosophy be classified as a science subject and "dogmatic" literature. Philosophy is excluded from Academia Sinica, the highest scientific research institution. After listening to Wang Guowei talk about Dai Zhen, a radical academic leader, Hu Shi, began to pay attention to the academic history of the Qing Dynasty, so that he gave up the history of philosophy in the last two decades. The writing of literary history turns to pure textual research.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)中國新文學(xué)研究中心;
【分類號】：I0-02
【正文快照】： 現(xiàn)代大學(xué)教育的興起,是中國邁向現(xiàn)代化過程中阻力最小的一場社會(huì)變革,同時(shí)也是與民族、國家及個(gè)人關(guān)系最為密切的大事。民國時(shí)期的大學(xué)生態(tài),首先是被西化的現(xiàn)代大學(xué)理念和大學(xué)精神所籠罩,其次才是本土化調(diào)適。門戶開放、中西文化交流、知識的革新,使得學(xué)人由身處“天朝”、“

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張雪飛;;傅斯年文論思想淺析[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

，

本文編號：1406491