格羅塞藝術(shù)起源觀研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-08 21:10
【摘要】：就藝術(shù)的起源問題本身而言，至今已有無數(shù)位研究者及數(shù)不清的著作。德國著名藝術(shù)史家格羅塞(Ernst Grosse1862~1927)的《藝術(shù)的起源》一書，發(fā)表于1894年。在歐洲乃至世界上，這是一本較早研究藝術(shù)的起源和發(fā)展的專著，對后世影響深遠(yuǎn)。如奧地利藝術(shù)史家赫爾內(nèi)斯、德國史學(xué)家屈恩等，都對其十分推崇。俄國馬克思主義美學(xué)家普列漢諾夫在其名著《論藝術(shù)——沒有地址的信》中，也大量引用這部著作里的觀點(diǎn)，并對格羅塞的研究作出了極高的評價。在《藝術(shù)的起源》一書中，格羅塞在吸取前人成果的基礎(chǔ)上，運(yùn)用邏輯與事實相結(jié)合的方法，通過自己的研究，做了大量考證，對原始民族的各種藝術(shù)形式做了系統(tǒng)而辯證的探討和解釋，并提出了新的觀點(diǎn)。他的人類學(xué)方法開創(chuàng)了研究藝術(shù)起源問題的新角度，被后來的許多學(xué)者奉為經(jīng)典，并經(jīng)常引述其中的觀點(diǎn)和例證。這些看法，立足于唯物主義，是科學(xué)的，先進(jìn)的。盡管格羅塞作為藝術(shù)人類學(xué)的先驅(qū)，他的方法是值得學(xué)習(xí)的，但是，格羅塞畢竟生活在19世紀(jì)，他的許多觀點(diǎn)依然是不成熟的，是受到當(dāng)時條件的局限的，他無法預(yù)測到后來藝術(shù)學(xué)、考古學(xué)以及人類學(xué)、民俗學(xué)方面的新的研究成果。在今天，我們的研究水平和條件比格羅塞的時代前進(jìn)了很多，資料也比當(dāng)時完善很多，而我們讀格羅塞的時候，能夠感受到，他的藝術(shù)起源研究固然有很多缺陷，很多理論已經(jīng)過時，但是其研究方法和許多研究成果至今依然具有極其重要的借鑒意義。迄今為止，大部分對格羅塞的研究基本上都是把眼光放在某一種觀點(diǎn)或者某一部分的研究成果上，全面系統(tǒng)研究格羅塞藝術(shù)起源觀的理論的專門論著相對較少。 本文從格羅塞《藝術(shù)的起源》一書入手，目的就是對其全書的主要內(nèi)容做出研究和分析，全面地論述其對原始民族藝術(shù)的各個門類研究的主要觀點(diǎn)，對其成就和對當(dāng)今具有借鑒意義的一些觀點(diǎn)及研究方法從藝術(shù)人類學(xué)的創(chuàng)立、經(jīng)濟(jì)社會與藝術(shù)起源的關(guān)系、藝術(shù)起源的多元論以及他對原始藝術(shù)本質(zhì)和作用的正確認(rèn)識等幾個方面進(jìn)行總結(jié)和系統(tǒng)把握，最后對其理論的一些重要缺陷和已經(jīng)落后于當(dāng)今研究成果的觀點(diǎn)，即藝術(shù)科學(xué)的建立與人種學(xué)研究的不足、現(xiàn)代原始民族藝術(shù)研究方向的片面性、現(xiàn)代人對原始藝術(shù)理解的局限性和“純粹的樂趣”觀的缺點(diǎn)方面加以甄別和反思，從而對格羅塞的藝術(shù)起源觀做出一個完整客觀的評價。
[Abstract]:As far as the origin of art itself is concerned, there have been countless researchers and countless works. The Origin of Art, by German art historian Ernst Grosse1862~1927, published in 1894. In Europe and even in the world, this is an early monograph on the origin and development of art, which has a profound influence on later generations. For example, Austrian art historian Herr A. Nuis, German historian Kuhn, and so on, are highly respected. The Russian Marxist aesthetician, Plainov, in his masterpiece on Art-A letter without address, also quotes a lot from this work, and makes a very high evaluation of Grosser's research. In the book Origin of Art, Grosser, on the basis of absorbing the achievements of his predecessors, uses the method of combining logic with fact, and makes a lot of textual research through his own research. This paper makes a systematic and dialectical discussion and explanation of the various artistic forms of the primitive nation, and puts forward a new point of view. His anthropological methods have opened up a new angle of study on the origin of art, which has been regarded as a classic by many later scholars, whose viewpoints and examples are often quoted. These views, based on materialism, are scientific and advanced. Although Grosser was a pioneer in art anthropology, his method was worth learning, but Grosser lived in the 19th century, and many of his views were still immature and limited by the conditions at that time. He could not predict new research in art, archaeology, and anthropology and folklore. Today, our research level and conditions are much better than those of Grosser's time, and the materials are much better than at that time. When we read Grosser, we can feel that his study of the origin of art has many defects. Many theories are out of date, but their research methods and achievements are still of great significance. Up to now, most of the researches on Grosser have focused on a certain point of view or a part of the research results, and there are relatively few specialized works on the theory of Grosser's view of artistic origin in a comprehensive and systematic way. This paper begins with Grosser's book Origin of Art, the purpose of which is to study and analyze the main contents of his book, and to expound his main viewpoints on various categories of primitive national art. From the foundation of artistic anthropology, the relationship between economy and society and the origin of art, The pluralism of the origin of art and his correct understanding of the essence and function of primitive art are summarized and systematically grasped. Finally, some important defects of his theory and the viewpoint that he has lagged behind the current research results. That is, the establishment of art science and the deficiency of ethnography research, the one-sidedness of the research direction of modern primitive national art, the limitation of modern people's understanding of primitive art and the shortcomings of "pure fun" view. In order to make a complete and objective evaluation of Grosser's view of artistic origin.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：J110.9
本文編號：2258271
[Abstract]:As far as the origin of art itself is concerned, there have been countless researchers and countless works. The Origin of Art, by German art historian Ernst Grosse1862~1927, published in 1894. In Europe and even in the world, this is an early monograph on the origin and development of art, which has a profound influence on later generations. For example, Austrian art historian Herr A. Nuis, German historian Kuhn, and so on, are highly respected. The Russian Marxist aesthetician, Plainov, in his masterpiece on Art-A letter without address, also quotes a lot from this work, and makes a very high evaluation of Grosser's research. In the book Origin of Art, Grosser, on the basis of absorbing the achievements of his predecessors, uses the method of combining logic with fact, and makes a lot of textual research through his own research. This paper makes a systematic and dialectical discussion and explanation of the various artistic forms of the primitive nation, and puts forward a new point of view. His anthropological methods have opened up a new angle of study on the origin of art, which has been regarded as a classic by many later scholars, whose viewpoints and examples are often quoted. These views, based on materialism, are scientific and advanced. Although Grosser was a pioneer in art anthropology, his method was worth learning, but Grosser lived in the 19th century, and many of his views were still immature and limited by the conditions at that time. He could not predict new research in art, archaeology, and anthropology and folklore. Today, our research level and conditions are much better than those of Grosser's time, and the materials are much better than at that time. When we read Grosser, we can feel that his study of the origin of art has many defects. Many theories are out of date, but their research methods and achievements are still of great significance. Up to now, most of the researches on Grosser have focused on a certain point of view or a part of the research results, and there are relatively few specialized works on the theory of Grosser's view of artistic origin in a comprehensive and systematic way. This paper begins with Grosser's book Origin of Art, the purpose of which is to study and analyze the main contents of his book, and to expound his main viewpoints on various categories of primitive national art. From the foundation of artistic anthropology, the relationship between economy and society and the origin of art, The pluralism of the origin of art and his correct understanding of the essence and function of primitive art are summarized and systematically grasped. Finally, some important defects of his theory and the viewpoint that he has lagged behind the current research results. That is, the establishment of art science and the deficiency of ethnography research, the one-sidedness of the research direction of modern primitive national art, the limitation of modern people's understanding of primitive art and the shortcomings of "pure fun" view. In order to make a complete and objective evaluation of Grosser's view of artistic origin.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：J110.9
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 姜慶國;;“藝術(shù)起源于勞動”說質(zhì)疑[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1982年03期
2 王東明 ,徐學(xué)清;一個值得探討的理論問題——也談藝術(shù)不僅僅起源于勞動[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1982年06期
3 羅中起;藝術(shù)起源是一個歷史過程[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1983年06期
4 陳廣宏;正確理解“藝術(shù)起源于勞動”說——與姜慶國同志商榷[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1982年06期
5 成喬明;;對格羅塞藝術(shù)起源觀的再認(rèn)知[J];學(xué)理論;2009年19期
6 陳元貴;;藝術(shù)起源與藝術(shù)科學(xué)“合法性”之聯(lián)系——由格羅塞《藝術(shù)的起源》說開去[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2006年03期
7 王德勝;;藝術(shù)起源理論的中國形態(tài)——“中國美學(xué):1900～1949”研究之一[J];山東社會科學(xué);2008年01期
8 李躍紅;“多原因說”的原因及其結(jié)構(gòu)模式——原始藝術(shù)發(fā)生問題新探[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版);2005年07期
9 王清亮;;藝術(shù)起源論——對藝術(shù)起源于勞動的辨析[J];藝術(shù)教育;2006年06期
10 楊啟梅;;淺析早期幾何紋飾的起因[J];藝術(shù)與設(shè)計(理論);2009年10期
，本文編號：2258271
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2258271.html
教材專著
