交流話語與文學(xué)批評(píng)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-29 14:44
【摘要】： 20世紀(jì)是批評(píng)的世紀(jì)。然而與熱鬧喧囂的文學(xué)批評(píng)實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域相比，文學(xué)批評(píng)理論的建設(shè)卻顯得有些冷清而平靜。文學(xué)批評(píng)的理論建設(shè)指作為獨(dú)立學(xué)科的文學(xué)批評(píng)學(xué)的建設(shè)，就國外的研究情況而言，文學(xué)批評(píng)學(xué)的系統(tǒng)研究不過只有百年左右的歷史，在中國，它更是一門剛剛起步，遠(yuǎn)未成熟的新學(xué)科。 就現(xiàn)已成形的文學(xué)批評(píng)理論研究來說，批評(píng)理論的表述層面與批評(píng)實(shí)踐的實(shí)際進(jìn)展之間存在著一定的脫節(jié)和錯(cuò)位，這體現(xiàn)為：在探討思考文學(xué)批評(píng)的性質(zhì)、功能、主體等問題的時(shí)候，對(duì)新出現(xiàn)的特別是20世紀(jì)后半期以來的批評(píng)觀念、批評(píng)意識(shí)關(guān)注和吸納得不夠，于是造成這樣一種結(jié)果：20世紀(jì)文學(xué)批評(píng)領(lǐng)域中的一些關(guān)鍵詞，如交往理性、對(duì)話理論、主體間性、意向性等，幾乎沒有被整合到批評(píng)理論體系之中。上述狀況的存在為本論文的研究取向提供了目標(biāo)，在當(dāng)代理論語境中探討文學(xué)批評(píng)理論的建設(shè)與創(chuàng)新，盡量運(yùn)用新的觀念、理論，借鑒新的研究成果思考文學(xué)批評(píng)的性質(zhì)、特征、運(yùn)作機(jī)制、主體功能等課題，這是本論文寫作的努力方向，也是本選題理論意義及價(jià)值的體現(xiàn)。 論文的基本思路是，盡量站在文學(xué)批評(píng)理論發(fā)展的前沿地帶，回顧和總結(jié)文學(xué)批評(píng)理論發(fā)展的實(shí)績(jī)，發(fā)揮批評(píng)理論體系的順應(yīng)與整合效力，使得批評(píng)理論的概念設(shè)置、命題內(nèi)容、理論邏輯、思維結(jié)果都能反映文學(xué)批評(píng)理論的新內(nèi)涵和新動(dòng)態(tài)。論文以辯證邏輯思維的方法作為方法論基礎(chǔ)，結(jié)合歸納綜合、演繹分析、分類比較等方法，同時(shí)借鑒現(xiàn)象學(xué)、解釋學(xué)等方法，力圖更加全面立體地勾勒出文學(xué)批評(píng)理論建構(gòu)的整體輪廓。 論文共分六章，各章主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一章“交流與批評(píng)”，從人際交往的角度入手，探討人類的一般交流、藝術(shù)交流與文學(xué)交流之間的關(guān)系，指出文學(xué)交流的內(nèi)涵在于作者、文本、讀者之間的雙向影響關(guān)系。進(jìn)而對(duì)文學(xué)交流的機(jī)制、媒介和效果等問題進(jìn)行分析和論述，在進(jìn)一步突出文學(xué)交流的特性與功能的同時(shí)，將文學(xué)批評(píng)納入文學(xué)交流整體流程之中，以確立文學(xué)批評(píng)的位置、角色和主題，體現(xiàn)出交流學(xué)視角下的文學(xué)批評(píng)理論的特色。 第二章“話語與批評(píng)”，首先對(duì)話語概念本身進(jìn)行梳理，從話語與交流、話語與陳述、話語與權(quán)力等不同角度進(jìn)一步探討話語的特性和實(shí)質(zhì)，把握話語理論的內(nèi)涵。其次對(duì)文學(xué)話語進(jìn)行專題研究，從指稱與語境的關(guān)系、文學(xué)話語的表達(dá)建構(gòu)行為與文學(xué)隱喻的關(guān)系等方面入手，揭示文學(xué)話語不同于一般話語的獨(dú)特之處。然后將重點(diǎn)放在批評(píng)話語方面，就話語的生產(chǎn)性與批評(píng)理論的增殖、話語的對(duì)話性與批評(píng)理論的多元開放等問題進(jìn)行闡述，以凸顯文學(xué)批評(píng)在話語性的文學(xué)整體活動(dòng)中的真正意義和作用。 第三章“文本意義：文學(xué)批評(píng)的關(guān)注焦點(diǎn)”，在引入法國學(xué)者雅各布森交流圖式的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)其加以改進(jìn)，以一個(gè)可以專門用于文學(xué)批評(píng)這一特殊交流行為的圖式作為參照系，分別從交流主體(即作者與讀者)、交流背景(即語境與聯(lián)系)、交流載體(即文本與代碼)三個(gè)方面考察文學(xué)批評(píng)對(duì)文學(xué)文本意義的解讀行為，文本意義的解讀既不是向作者原意的回歸，也不是讀者的隨意解釋，而是以交流圖式中的各構(gòu)成要素為依據(jù)的綜合性創(chuàng)造活動(dòng)。在此，20世紀(jì)文學(xué)批評(píng)理論超越單純的價(jià)值評(píng)判，轉(zhuǎn)而以意義闡釋和探尋為主要內(nèi)容的新特征得到了強(qiáng)調(diào)，并使輕解讀重評(píng)價(jià)的傳統(tǒng)批評(píng)觀念得到糾正，批評(píng)重新成為一種以解讀為基礎(chǔ)，解讀與評(píng)價(jià)并重的活動(dòng)。 第四章“間性：文學(xué)批評(píng)的性質(zhì)與定位”，以“主體間性”、“文本間性”理論為啟發(fā)，將“間性”作為描述和界定文學(xué)批評(píng)特性的關(guān)鍵詞，以突出它的中介性和橋梁性。文學(xué)批評(píng)既是文學(xué)理論與文學(xué)實(shí)踐的中介，又在自身體現(xiàn)了科學(xué)性與文學(xué)性的互補(bǔ)關(guān)系；它還兼具將主觀性與客觀性綜合調(diào)節(jié)，以指導(dǎo)批評(píng)行為的功能；并且在政治與學(xué)術(shù)之間，文學(xué)批評(píng)亦能求得一種動(dòng)態(tài)的平衡�？梢哉f，間性理論使得我們對(duì)文學(xué)批評(píng)的性質(zhì)與定位問題的理論探討更趨全面與合理。 第五章“闡釋與評(píng)價(jià)：文學(xué)批評(píng)的程序、步驟與功能”，首先探討形成文學(xué)批評(píng)的主客觀條件的問題，然后按“準(zhǔn)備、觀察、潛入、領(lǐng)會(huì)”四個(gè)階段分析文學(xué)批評(píng)的思維程序。緊扣意義闡釋和價(jià)值評(píng)判這兩個(gè)批評(píng)活動(dòng)的中心內(nèi)容，梳理出“確立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——具體分析——整體揭示”這樣一種文學(xué)批評(píng)的實(shí)施步驟。進(jìn)而對(duì)文學(xué)批評(píng)的社會(huì)功能問題加以總結(jié)和概括，分別就文學(xué)批評(píng)對(duì)作家、作品、讀者、社會(huì)的影響作用問題進(jìn)行思考和探究。 第六章“話語主體：文學(xué)批評(píng)家”，對(duì)批評(píng)主體的心理素質(zhì)、心理特征、行為準(zhǔn)則、類型劃分等問題進(jìn)行較深入的思考，，將批評(píng)家的心理素質(zhì)總結(jié)為“整體感、平衡感、還原能力”三個(gè)方面；從“審美體驗(yàn)、審美意向、意義表現(xiàn)”三個(gè)方面探討批評(píng)家的心理特征問題；以“對(duì)象化、自主性與公眾性的統(tǒng)一、克服偏見、建設(shè)性”作為批評(píng)家的行為準(zhǔn)則；分別將“角色身份、批評(píng)態(tài)度、批評(píng)方式”作為分類依據(jù)，區(qū)分批評(píng)家的不同類型。本章著重從心理學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)的角度探討批評(píng)主體問題，以圖超越以往理論習(xí)慣的對(duì)批評(píng)主體僅作道德和信念層面上的要求和評(píng)價(jià)的種種局限。 本論文的創(chuàng)新之處主要有以下四點(diǎn)：第一，將具有當(dāng)代理論意義和價(jià)值的交流理論運(yùn)用于對(duì)文學(xué)批評(píng)的理解與思考之中，以顯示文學(xué)批評(píng)在交流學(xué)層面上的意義內(nèi)涵，體現(xiàn)文學(xué)批評(píng)在文學(xué)活動(dòng)整體格局中的真正價(jià)值。第二，把話語研究引入文學(xué)批評(píng)理論的建構(gòu)之中，由此凸顯文學(xué)批評(píng)的深層內(nèi)涵和性質(zhì)。20世紀(jì)影響整個(gè)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)領(lǐng)域的“語言學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向”已經(jīng)從語義學(xué)研究層面進(jìn)入語用學(xué)研究層面，或者說語言學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向已發(fā)展到了話語轉(zhuǎn)向的階段。話語理論將語言研究從結(jié)構(gòu)主義式的抽象與規(guī)則帶向了主體之間的交往活動(dòng)之中，由于話語行為體現(xiàn)的正是主體之間在言談與講述層面上的交流與互動(dòng)，所以說，話語理論和交流理論可謂殊途同歸，兩者會(huì)聚于對(duì)話交流與互動(dòng)這一理論基點(diǎn)上，而這應(yīng)該是研究20世紀(jì)文學(xué)批評(píng)理論的一個(gè)具有當(dāng)代學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值的切入點(diǎn)。第三，將文本意義的解讀闡釋作為文學(xué)批評(píng)的基本問題，體現(xiàn)了批評(píng)理論的最新進(jìn)展，對(duì)文本意義解讀闡釋行為的重視促使人們對(duì)批評(píng)活動(dòng)和批評(píng)家自身進(jìn)行重新定位，批評(píng)的定位與功能的轉(zhuǎn)變，使文學(xué)批評(píng)由語義闡釋、鑒賞評(píng)判發(fā)展成為更全面和更具創(chuàng)造性的話語實(shí)踐活動(dòng)。第四，側(cè)重從心理學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)角度探討文學(xué)批評(píng)主體問題，結(jié)合相關(guān)研究領(lǐng)域的新成果，對(duì)文學(xué)批評(píng)家的心理素質(zhì)、心理特征、行為準(zhǔn)則等問題加以較為深入的探討，運(yùn)用意向性、多元體驗(yàn)、角色身份等心理學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)語，力圖從學(xué)理層面上對(duì)批評(píng)主體的個(gè)體心理活動(dòng)和社會(huì)交往活動(dòng)進(jìn)行綜合研究，讓有關(guān)批評(píng)主體的理論內(nèi)容更加切實(shí)和有效。
[Abstract]:The 20th century is the century of criticism. However, compared with the bustling field of literary criticism, the construction of literary criticism theory is somewhat cold and calm. The theoretical construction of literary criticism refers to the construction of literary criticism as an independent discipline. As far as the research situation abroad is concerned, the systematic study of literary criticism is only a hundred years left. In the history of right, in China, it is a new discipline which has just started and is far from mature.
As far as the theory of literary criticism is concerned, there is a certain disjunction and dislocation between the expressive level of criticism theory and the actual progress of criticism practice. This is reflected in the following aspects: when discussing the nature, function and subject of literary criticism, criticism of new ideas, especially since the second half of the 20th century Consciousness does not pay enough attention to and absorb it, which leads to the result that some key words in the field of literary criticism in the 20th century, such as communicative rationality, dialogue theory, intersubjectivity, intentionality, etc., are hardly integrated into the system of critical theory. To explore the construction and innovation of literary criticism theory, to use new ideas and theories as much as possible, and to think about the nature, characteristics, operating mechanism, and main function of literary criticism with the help of new research results, is the direction of this paper's writing and the embodiment of the theoretical significance and value of this topic.
The basic idea of this paper is to stand as far as possible in the forefront of the development of literary criticism theory, review and summarize the actual achievements of the development of literary criticism theory, give full play to the adaptability and integration of the theoretical system of criticism, so that the conceptual settings, propositional content, theoretical logic, and thinking results of the theory of literary criticism can reflect the new connotation and dynamics of the theory of literary criticism. Based on the methodology of dialectical logical thinking, this paper tries to outline the overall outline of the theoretical construction of literary criticism in a more comprehensive and three-dimensional way, combining inductive synthesis, deductive analysis, classification and comparison, and drawing on phenomenology, Hermeneutics and other methods.
The thesis is divided into six chapters. The main contents of each chapter are as follows:
Chapter One "Exchange and Criticism", starting from the angle of interpersonal communication, probes into the relationship between human beings'general communication, artistic exchange and literary exchange, and points out that the connotation of literary exchange lies in the bidirectional influence relationship among authors, texts and readers. While highlighting the characteristics and functions of literary communication, literary criticism is brought into the whole process of literary communication to establish the position, role and theme of literary criticism, reflecting the characteristics of literary criticism theory from the perspective of communication.
Chapter Two, "Discourse and Criticism", first of all, combs the concept of discourse itself, further explores the characteristics and essence of discourse from different perspectives, such as discourse and communication, discourse and statement, discourse and power, and grasps the connotation of discourse theory. Starting with the relationship between behavior and literary metaphor, this paper reveals the uniqueness of literary discourse which is different from that of general discourse, and then focuses on critical discourse, explaining such issues as the productivity of discourse and the proliferation of critical theory, the dialogism of discourse and the pluralistic opening of critical theory, in order to highlight literary criticism in Discourse literature. The true meaning and function of the whole activity.
Chapter Three, "Textual Meaning: the Focus of Literary Criticism", is an improvement on the basis of introducing the communication schema of Jacobson, a French scholar. This paper examines literary criticism's interpretation of the meaning of literary texts from three aspects: the carrier of communication (text and code). The interpretation of the meaning of literary texts is neither a return to the author's original intention nor an arbitrary interpretation by the reader, but a comprehensive creative activity based on the elements of the communication schema. The simpler the value judgment, the more emphasis has been placed on the new features with the interpretation and exploration of meaning as the main content, and the traditional criticism concept of light interpretation and heavy evaluation has been corrected.
Chapter Four "Intersexuality: Nature and Orientation of Literary Criticism". Inspired by the theory of "Intersubjectivity" and "Intertextuality", this chapter takes "Intersexuality" as a key word to describe and define the characteristics of literary criticism in order to highlight its intermediary and bridging nature. The complementary relationship between sex and literariness; it also has the function of adjusting both subjectivity and objectivity to guide criticism; and literary criticism can also find a dynamic balance between politics and academia. Reason.
Chapter Five, "Interpretation and Evaluation: Procedures, Procedures and Functions of Literary Criticism". First, it discusses the subjective and objective conditions of literary criticism. Then, it analyzes the thinking process of literary criticism according to the four stages of "preparation, observation, infiltration and comprehension". Firstly, it combs out the "meaning interpretation" and "value evaluation" which are the central contents of the two critical activities. Establishing criteria-specific analysis-overall disclosure"is an implementation step of literary criticism, and then the social function of literary criticism is summarized and summarized. The impact of literary criticism on writers, works, readers and society is considered and explored respectively.
Chapter Six, "The Subject of Discourse: Literary Critics", makes a deep thinking on the psychological quality, psychological characteristics, code of conduct and classification of the subject of criticism, summarizes the psychological quality of the critic into three aspects: the sense of entirety, the sense of balance and the ability to restore; and from three aspects: aesthetic experience, aesthetic intention and the expression of meaning. This chapter discusses the psychological characteristics of critics, takes "the unification of objectification, autonomy and publicity, overcoming prejudice and constructiveness" as the criterion of Critics'behavior, and classifies the different types of critics according to "role identity, critical attitude and critical style". In order to surmount the limitations of the previous theoretical habits in which the subject of criticism is only required and evaluated at the moral and belief levels.
The innovations of this thesis are as follows: firstly, the communicative theory with contemporary theoretical significance and value is applied to the understanding and thinking of literary criticism in order to show the meaning and connotation of literary criticism on the level of communicative science, and to reflect the real value of literary criticism in the overall pattern of literary activities. secondly, the discourse study The linguistic turn that influenced the whole field of Humanities and Social Sciences in the 20th century has entered the level of pragmatics from the level of semantics, or linguistic turn has developed to the stage of discourse turn. The study is carried from the abstraction and rules of structuralism to the communicative activities between subjects. Because discourse behavior embodies the communication and interaction between subjects at the level of speech and narration, discourse theory and communicative theory can be said to come together in different ways. They converge on the theoretical basis of dialogue and interaction, and this should be done. Thirdly, the interpretation of the meaning of the text is regarded as the basic problem of literary criticism, which reflects the latest development of the theory of criticism. Attention to the interpretation of the meaning of the text prompts people to reposition their criticism activities and critics themselves. The change of the orientation and function of criticism has made literary criticism develop from semantic interpretation and appreciation to more comprehensive and creative discourse practice. In order to make the theoretical content of the subject of criticism more practical and effective, this paper makes a thorough study of the criteria and other issues, using the psychological and sociological terms such as intentionality, multi-experience, role identity and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：I06
本文編號(hào)：2211528
[Abstract]:The 20th century is the century of criticism. However, compared with the bustling field of literary criticism, the construction of literary criticism theory is somewhat cold and calm. The theoretical construction of literary criticism refers to the construction of literary criticism as an independent discipline. As far as the research situation abroad is concerned, the systematic study of literary criticism is only a hundred years left. In the history of right, in China, it is a new discipline which has just started and is far from mature.
As far as the theory of literary criticism is concerned, there is a certain disjunction and dislocation between the expressive level of criticism theory and the actual progress of criticism practice. This is reflected in the following aspects: when discussing the nature, function and subject of literary criticism, criticism of new ideas, especially since the second half of the 20th century Consciousness does not pay enough attention to and absorb it, which leads to the result that some key words in the field of literary criticism in the 20th century, such as communicative rationality, dialogue theory, intersubjectivity, intentionality, etc., are hardly integrated into the system of critical theory. To explore the construction and innovation of literary criticism theory, to use new ideas and theories as much as possible, and to think about the nature, characteristics, operating mechanism, and main function of literary criticism with the help of new research results, is the direction of this paper's writing and the embodiment of the theoretical significance and value of this topic.
The basic idea of this paper is to stand as far as possible in the forefront of the development of literary criticism theory, review and summarize the actual achievements of the development of literary criticism theory, give full play to the adaptability and integration of the theoretical system of criticism, so that the conceptual settings, propositional content, theoretical logic, and thinking results of the theory of literary criticism can reflect the new connotation and dynamics of the theory of literary criticism. Based on the methodology of dialectical logical thinking, this paper tries to outline the overall outline of the theoretical construction of literary criticism in a more comprehensive and three-dimensional way, combining inductive synthesis, deductive analysis, classification and comparison, and drawing on phenomenology, Hermeneutics and other methods.
The thesis is divided into six chapters. The main contents of each chapter are as follows:
Chapter One "Exchange and Criticism", starting from the angle of interpersonal communication, probes into the relationship between human beings'general communication, artistic exchange and literary exchange, and points out that the connotation of literary exchange lies in the bidirectional influence relationship among authors, texts and readers. While highlighting the characteristics and functions of literary communication, literary criticism is brought into the whole process of literary communication to establish the position, role and theme of literary criticism, reflecting the characteristics of literary criticism theory from the perspective of communication.
Chapter Two, "Discourse and Criticism", first of all, combs the concept of discourse itself, further explores the characteristics and essence of discourse from different perspectives, such as discourse and communication, discourse and statement, discourse and power, and grasps the connotation of discourse theory. Starting with the relationship between behavior and literary metaphor, this paper reveals the uniqueness of literary discourse which is different from that of general discourse, and then focuses on critical discourse, explaining such issues as the productivity of discourse and the proliferation of critical theory, the dialogism of discourse and the pluralistic opening of critical theory, in order to highlight literary criticism in Discourse literature. The true meaning and function of the whole activity.
Chapter Three, "Textual Meaning: the Focus of Literary Criticism", is an improvement on the basis of introducing the communication schema of Jacobson, a French scholar. This paper examines literary criticism's interpretation of the meaning of literary texts from three aspects: the carrier of communication (text and code). The interpretation of the meaning of literary texts is neither a return to the author's original intention nor an arbitrary interpretation by the reader, but a comprehensive creative activity based on the elements of the communication schema. The simpler the value judgment, the more emphasis has been placed on the new features with the interpretation and exploration of meaning as the main content, and the traditional criticism concept of light interpretation and heavy evaluation has been corrected.
Chapter Four "Intersexuality: Nature and Orientation of Literary Criticism". Inspired by the theory of "Intersubjectivity" and "Intertextuality", this chapter takes "Intersexuality" as a key word to describe and define the characteristics of literary criticism in order to highlight its intermediary and bridging nature. The complementary relationship between sex and literariness; it also has the function of adjusting both subjectivity and objectivity to guide criticism; and literary criticism can also find a dynamic balance between politics and academia. Reason.
Chapter Five, "Interpretation and Evaluation: Procedures, Procedures and Functions of Literary Criticism". First, it discusses the subjective and objective conditions of literary criticism. Then, it analyzes the thinking process of literary criticism according to the four stages of "preparation, observation, infiltration and comprehension". Firstly, it combs out the "meaning interpretation" and "value evaluation" which are the central contents of the two critical activities. Establishing criteria-specific analysis-overall disclosure"is an implementation step of literary criticism, and then the social function of literary criticism is summarized and summarized. The impact of literary criticism on writers, works, readers and society is considered and explored respectively.
Chapter Six, "The Subject of Discourse: Literary Critics", makes a deep thinking on the psychological quality, psychological characteristics, code of conduct and classification of the subject of criticism, summarizes the psychological quality of the critic into three aspects: the sense of entirety, the sense of balance and the ability to restore; and from three aspects: aesthetic experience, aesthetic intention and the expression of meaning. This chapter discusses the psychological characteristics of critics, takes "the unification of objectification, autonomy and publicity, overcoming prejudice and constructiveness" as the criterion of Critics'behavior, and classifies the different types of critics according to "role identity, critical attitude and critical style". In order to surmount the limitations of the previous theoretical habits in which the subject of criticism is only required and evaluated at the moral and belief levels.
The innovations of this thesis are as follows: firstly, the communicative theory with contemporary theoretical significance and value is applied to the understanding and thinking of literary criticism in order to show the meaning and connotation of literary criticism on the level of communicative science, and to reflect the real value of literary criticism in the overall pattern of literary activities. secondly, the discourse study The linguistic turn that influenced the whole field of Humanities and Social Sciences in the 20th century has entered the level of pragmatics from the level of semantics, or linguistic turn has developed to the stage of discourse turn. The study is carried from the abstraction and rules of structuralism to the communicative activities between subjects. Because discourse behavior embodies the communication and interaction between subjects at the level of speech and narration, discourse theory and communicative theory can be said to come together in different ways. They converge on the theoretical basis of dialogue and interaction, and this should be done. Thirdly, the interpretation of the meaning of the text is regarded as the basic problem of literary criticism, which reflects the latest development of the theory of criticism. Attention to the interpretation of the meaning of the text prompts people to reposition their criticism activities and critics themselves. The change of the orientation and function of criticism has made literary criticism develop from semantic interpretation and appreciation to more comprehensive and creative discourse practice. In order to make the theoretical content of the subject of criticism more practical and effective, this paper makes a thorough study of the criteria and other issues, using the psychological and sociological terms such as intentionality, multi-experience, role identity and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：I06
【同被引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 趙志軍;尋找意識(shí)形態(tài)和文學(xué)形式的結(jié)合點(diǎn)——巴赫金的批評(píng)方法論[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年03期
2 王文忠;言語體裁理論的形成與發(fā)展[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期
3 馬理;邊界與體裁——試析巴赫金詩學(xué)元方法問題[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期
4 張杰;批評(píng)的超越——論巴赫金的整體性批評(píng)理論[J];文藝研究;1990年06期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 蔡玲;喬納森·卡勒之“文學(xué)能力”辨析[D];山東大學(xué);2005年
2 王瑋;卡勒結(jié)構(gòu)主義詩學(xué)研究[D];安徽師范大學(xué);2006年
3 張志國;作為含義和意味存在的文學(xué)意義[D];山東大學(xué);2007年
4 楊東平;巴赫金表述理論初探[D];浙江大學(xué);2008年
本文編號(hào)：2211528
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2211528.html
教材專著
