本文選題：德里達的文學理論批評思想 + 中國文論　； 參考：《蘭州大學》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 德里達文學理論批評思想與中國文論話語的轉換是一個紛繁復雜、不斷變換的動態(tài)過程。德里達解構理論對西方“邏各斯中心主義”的批判、對“互文性”的論述及其“文學是一種建制”的觀點，都順利在中國找到了生根發(fā)芽的土壤并形成了相應的批評實踐。而中國文學理論話語也正是吸納了德里達的文學理論批評思想的精髓，對原有的批評模式進行了深刻的反思、批判，進而促使固有的批評話語發(fā)生變化。首先，從傳播的緯度看，由于文本本身的晦澀難懂和不同傳播者的文化背景、傳播的途徑以及翻譯的滯后等因素的影響，被傳播的思想與源思想之間發(fā)生一定程度的偏離。其次，從接受的緯度來看，，德里達思想僅僅是涌入中國文壇的眾多理論流派之一家，處于被選擇的地位，作為接受者，理論界的學人們的心態(tài)是復雜的，理論立場、學術心態(tài)、方法論等都會影響接受。最后，從應用的緯度看，中國文論話語的轉換本身是一面鏡子，文學創(chuàng)作自覺不自覺地解構宏大敘事的趨向，誘使批評家對一些具有解構主義特質的文學文本進行解構主義批評、闡釋。當然，理論的傳播、接受與應用這三者之間并沒有不可逾越的鴻溝，實際上三者是難于分割、密切關聯(lián)的。本文分別以清晰可辨的三部分來論述，只是為了便于問題的展開。
[Abstract]:The transformation between Derrida's critical thought of literary theory and the discourse of Chinese literary theory is a complicated and dynamic process. Derrida's deconstruction theory criticizes the "logos centrism" in the West, discusses "intertextuality" and "literature is a kind of system", all of them find the soil to take root and form the corresponding critical practice in China. Meanwhile, the discourse of Chinese literary theory also absorbs the essence of Derrida's literary theory criticism thought, and deeply reflects on and criticizes the original critical mode, which makes the inherent critical discourse change. First of all, from the perspective of communication, due to the obscurity of the text itself and the influence of the cultural background of different communicators, the channel of communication and the lag of translation, there is a certain degree of deviation between the transmitted thought and the source thought. Secondly, from the perspective of acceptance, Derrida's thought is only one of the many theoretical schools that pour into the Chinese literary world and is in the selected position. As a receiver, the mentality of the scholars in the theoretical circle is complicated, the theoretical stand, the academic mentality, Methodology can influence acceptance. Finally, from the perspective of application, the transformation of Chinese literary discourse itself is a mirror, whether literary creation consciously deconstructs the trend of grand narration. It induces critics to criticize and interpret some literary texts with deconstruction characteristics. Of course, there is not an insurmountable gap between the spread of theory, acceptance and application. In fact, the three are difficult to separate and closely related. This paper discusses the problem in three distinct parts, just for the sake of the problem.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：I06

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 趙文華;羅蘭·巴特文本主義理論及影響研究[D];西北大學;2010年

本文編號：2112346