東方“虛靜說”與西方“靜穆觀”之美學比較
發(fā)布時間：2019-05-22 21:16
【摘要】："虛靜"和"靜穆"是東西方古典藝術作品極力追求的審美意境。兩者雖都包含"靜"字,但其涵義卻是大不相同的,前者著力于"虛",后者著力于"穆",兩者都認為只有做到"靜"才能雋永含蓄、達到永恒之美。東方"虛靜說"要求創(chuàng)作主體在創(chuàng)作時進入"物我兩忘"的境地,并要求作品達到"物我交融"、"以天合天"的意境之美;西方"靜穆觀"則要求創(chuàng)作主體模仿真實,嚴格遵從美的形式法則、以人工之巧智達到最自然的唯美形式,要求作品體現(xiàn)出崇高與莊嚴的氣息、體現(xiàn)單純與純凈之美。"虛靜說"對中國藝術的審美標準有重要影響,而"靜穆觀"則成為判定西方古典主義藝術形式與內涵的重要準繩。對二者的比較可以探知東西方古典藝術的異同,從而創(chuàng)作出既具民族特色、又具國際特點的優(yōu)秀藝術作品。
[Abstract]:Virtual stillness and quietness are the aesthetic artistic conception pursued by classical works of art in the East and the West. Although both of them contain the word "quiet", their meanings are very different. The former focuses on "virtual" and the latter focuses on "Mu". Both of them believe that only by being "quiet" can they be meaningful and achieve eternal beauty. The oriental "virtual quiet theory" requires the creative subject to enter the situation of "things and I forget" when creating, and requires the works to achieve the beauty of the artistic conception of "blending between things and me" and "integrating heaven with heaven". The western "Jingmu View" requires the creative subject to imitate the truth, strictly abide by the formal law of beauty, achieve the most natural aesthetic form with artificial ingenuity, and require the works to embody the lofty and solemn breath and the beauty of simplicity and purity. " The theory of virtual stillness has an important influence on the aesthetic standard of Chinese art, and the view of Jingmu has become an important criterion for judging the form and connotation of western classicism art. The comparison between the two can find out the similarities and differences between eastern and western classical art, so as to create excellent works of art with both national and international characteristics.
【作者單位】： 泰州學院;清華大學美術學院;
【分類號】：B83-091
本文編號：2483266
[Abstract]:Virtual stillness and quietness are the aesthetic artistic conception pursued by classical works of art in the East and the West. Although both of them contain the word "quiet", their meanings are very different. The former focuses on "virtual" and the latter focuses on "Mu". Both of them believe that only by being "quiet" can they be meaningful and achieve eternal beauty. The oriental "virtual quiet theory" requires the creative subject to enter the situation of "things and I forget" when creating, and requires the works to achieve the beauty of the artistic conception of "blending between things and me" and "integrating heaven with heaven". The western "Jingmu View" requires the creative subject to imitate the truth, strictly abide by the formal law of beauty, achieve the most natural aesthetic form with artificial ingenuity, and require the works to embody the lofty and solemn breath and the beauty of simplicity and purity. " The theory of virtual stillness has an important influence on the aesthetic standard of Chinese art, and the view of Jingmu has become an important criterion for judging the form and connotation of western classicism art. The comparison between the two can find out the similarities and differences between eastern and western classical art, so as to create excellent works of art with both national and international characteristics.
【作者單位】： 泰州學院;清華大學美術學院;
【分類號】：B83-091
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 黃貞權;虛靜說的美學之旅[J];求索;2003年06期
2 張金梅;虛靜與審美創(chuàng)造[J];河海大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年01期
3 張海鷹;;虛靜本體特征探討[J];浙江海洋學院學報(人文科學版);2006年03期
4 李獻惠;;審美虛靜說探析[J];武警學院學報;2006年05期
5 王超;;試論老莊虛靜說的美學影響[J];課外語文(初中);2012年10期
6 祝峰;;宇宙本體“生”與中國古典美學“虛靜”命題之思辨[J];南京師范大學文學院學報;2007年04期
7 鄧新華;;“虛靜”的文藝心理探索——中國古代文藝心理學思想研究之一[J];華中師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1990年03期
8 柳曉楓;;“虛靜”說——中國古代審美心態(tài)論[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2010年05期
9 劉瑩;;淺析莊學中的“虛靜”精神及其美學影響—以魏晉、宋代為例[J];北方文學(下半月);2012年04期
10 彭修銀;劉建榮;;中國古典美學范疇“虛靜”中的超越情結[J];江蘇師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年02期
相關會議論文 前1條
1 韓可勝;;虛靜:一個本體性的美學范疇[A];東方叢刊（1992年第2輯 總第二輯）[C];1992年
，本文編號：2483266
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/meixuelunwen/2483266.html
