【摘要】：運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)分析法,詳細(xì)地分析了對(duì)心理距離說批判最有代表性的分析美學(xué)家迪基(D ickie)的基本觀點(diǎn)以及得失所在,并試圖得出結(jié)論,即在這場(chǎng)論爭(zhēng)中,盡管是以迪基為代表的持批判立場(chǎng)的學(xué)者,對(duì)心理距離說的退出歷史舞臺(tái)起到了摧毀性的作用,但以卡塞比爾(Casebier)為代表的持堅(jiān)持和修正立場(chǎng)的學(xué)者,對(duì)心理距離說的解體也起到了推波助瀾的作用。最后對(duì)心理距離說在中國(guó)傳播中的轉(zhuǎn)變及對(duì)中國(guó)美學(xué)建設(shè)的價(jià)值給予了一定的觀照。
[Abstract]:By using the method of literature analysis, this paper analyzes in detail the basic viewpoints and the gains and losses of (D ickie), an analytical esthetician who is the most representative critic of the psychological distance theory, and attempts to draw a conclusion, that is, in this controversy, Although the critical scholars, represented by Dicki, have played a destructive role in the withdrawal of the psychological distance theory from the historical stage, the scholars, represented by Casebier (Casebier), hold the position of insistence and revision. The disintegration of the psychological distance theory also played a role in contributing to the fire. Finally, the change of psychological distance theory in Chinese communication and the value of Chinese aesthetic construction are considered.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院文學(xué)系
【基金】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院院級(jí)重大課題“美學(xué)的文化學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向”
【分類號(hào)】：B83

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 翁瑜;陀斯妥耶夫斯基作品的獨(dú)特個(gè)性[J];安順師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

2 王珂;論回文詩(shī)的文體源流和文體價(jià)值[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

3 謝文芳;短信語(yǔ)言幽默之解析[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年11期

4 朱忠元;審美教育:恢復(fù)人性完整建構(gòu)和諧人格的一項(xiàng)社會(huì)工程[J];甘肅高師學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

5 韓會(huì)敏;論徐，

本文編號(hào)：2280651