利奧塔德敘事美學(xué)與消費(fèi)社會(huì)敘事
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-17 20:21
【摘要】：后現(xiàn)代主義思想家利奧塔德在批判用絕對(duì)之標(biāo)準(zhǔn)去界定一切差異將統(tǒng)一所有的話語(yǔ)的現(xiàn)代“元敘事”時(shí)曾宣明主張,所謂“元敘事”這一理論化的美學(xué)核心概念,作為黑格爾的美學(xué)思辯思維哲學(xué)的必然產(chǎn)物,以及自由解放的“宏大敘事”理論化結(jié)構(gòu)空間,體現(xiàn)為人性的解放其實(shí)也是一種“宏大敘事”,這讓人們?cè)趧?chuàng)作中崇尚社會(huì)公共領(lǐng)域中的公正、正義,關(guān)注和揭示社會(huì)政治壓迫,關(guān)注弱小群體的命運(yùn),追求社會(huì)理想以及社會(huì)解放等等。簡(jiǎn)言之,所有與政治、社會(huì)、公共、群體、階級(jí)、集團(tuán)甚至是精神、道德相關(guān)的題材與主題的美學(xué)敘事,都可以被稱為“宏大敘事”的敘事范式,雖然有的敘事體現(xiàn)為一種不真實(shí)的、虛偽的表象性敘事,但它都體現(xiàn)為一種書寫自我、個(gè)人化特性、以及與個(gè)人化特性相關(guān)的人體、欲望、夢(mèng)幻、記憶、潛意識(shí)的真正意義上的個(gè)人化寫作。利奧塔德這種新的美學(xué)敘事批評(píng)話語(yǔ)語(yǔ)境,使得當(dāng)代社會(huì)的自20世紀(jì)80年代延續(xù)下來的消費(fèi)主義批評(píng)風(fēng)格日益變得不可理喻了。這對(duì)于消費(fèi)社會(huì)單個(gè)的個(gè)人化感悟、反思或者狂躁的激烈言說,已經(jīng)不再是美學(xué)敘事的合理化方式了。
[Abstract]:In criticizing the modern "meta-narration" in which all differences will unify all discourses by absolute criteria, the postmodernist thinker Leottad declared that the so-called "meta-narrative" is the core aesthetic concept of theorization. As the inevitable product of Hegel's philosophical thinking and the theorized space of "grand narration", the liberation of human nature is also a kind of "grand narrative". This makes people advocate the justice and justice in the social public sphere in their creation, pay attention to and reveal the social political oppression, pay attention to the fate of the weak groups, pursue the social ideal and social liberation, and so on. In short, all aesthetic narratives of subjects and themes related to politics, society, public, group, class, group and even spirit and morality can be called the narrative paradigm of "grand narration". Although some narratives are untrue and hypocritical, they are embodied in the writing of the self, the personality, and the human body, desire, dream, memory associated with the personality. Personal writing in the true sense of the subconscious. The new discourse context of aesthetic narrative criticism in Leotta makes the consumerism criticism style of contemporary society which has continued since the 1980s to be unreasonable day by day. It is no longer a rational way of aesthetic narration for individual perception, introspection or manic talk in consumer society.
【作者單位】：
【分類號(hào)】：B83-02
，
本文編號(hào)：2246986
[Abstract]:In criticizing the modern "meta-narration" in which all differences will unify all discourses by absolute criteria, the postmodernist thinker Leottad declared that the so-called "meta-narrative" is the core aesthetic concept of theorization. As the inevitable product of Hegel's philosophical thinking and the theorized space of "grand narration", the liberation of human nature is also a kind of "grand narrative". This makes people advocate the justice and justice in the social public sphere in their creation, pay attention to and reveal the social political oppression, pay attention to the fate of the weak groups, pursue the social ideal and social liberation, and so on. In short, all aesthetic narratives of subjects and themes related to politics, society, public, group, class, group and even spirit and morality can be called the narrative paradigm of "grand narration". Although some narratives are untrue and hypocritical, they are embodied in the writing of the self, the personality, and the human body, desire, dream, memory associated with the personality. Personal writing in the true sense of the subconscious. The new discourse context of aesthetic narrative criticism in Leotta makes the consumerism criticism style of contemporary society which has continued since the 1980s to be unreasonable day by day. It is no longer a rational way of aesthetic narration for individual perception, introspection or manic talk in consumer society.
【作者單位】：
【分類號(hào)】：B83-02
，
本文編號(hào)：2246986
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/meixuelunwen/2246986.html
最近更新
教材專著
