【摘要】：正 與世界上其他大文明圈相比,似乎惟獨(dú)中國沒有產(chǎn)生高級意義上的宗教。原因何在?單純著眼于政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)等方面的社會分析恐怕仍不足以把握問題的實(shí)質(zhì)。例如,按照流行的歷史公式,宗教是統(tǒng)治階級用來控制人民的意識形態(tài)的工具和精神鴉片。如此看來,中國的封建統(tǒng)治階級理應(yīng)充分利用宗教為自己服務(wù),但事實(shí)上在中國封建時代里,既沒有產(chǎn)生嚴(yán)格意義上的高級宗教,而且外來的佛教和土產(chǎn)的道教卻往往被歷代統(tǒng)治者所排斥,幾乎從來沒有成為占主導(dǎo)地位的意識形態(tài),唯獨(dú)儒家無神的泛道德學(xué)說始終被奉為正統(tǒng)。這個事實(shí)啟示人們,普遍的歷史模式并不足以解決具體的歷史和文化問題,人們有必要轉(zhuǎn)換視角,改變思
[Abstract]:Compared with other great civilizations in the world, it'seems that China has no high-level religion. Why? The social analysis of politics, economy and so on is not enough to grasp the essence of the problem. For example, according to the popular historical formula, religion is the tool and spiritual opium used by the ruling class to control the ideology of the people. Thus, China's feudal ruling class should make full use of religion to serve itself, but in fact, in the feudal times in China, there was no high religion in the strict sense. Moreover, the foreign Buddhism and native Taoism were often rejected by the rulers of the past dynasties, almost never became the dominant ideology, but the Confucian apocalyptic doctrine of pan-morality was always regarded as orthodox. This fact reveals that the universal historical model is not enough to solve the specific historical and cultural problems, and it is necessary to change the perspective and change the thinking.
【作者單位】： 廣東省社會科學(xué)院哲學(xué)研究所

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 路文彬;當(dāng)下文化思潮中的倫理問題[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 沈燕;重返精神的家園——榮格的集體無意識與美學(xué)思想[D];安徽大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號：2182909