本文選題：孔子 + 老子　； 參考：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：孔子與老子是先秦諸子中儒、道兩家思想的最具代表者，，其思想中的文學(xué)觀念共同奠定了我國古代文學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)。將他們的文學(xué)思想進(jìn)行比較研究，具有重要的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。本文主要從發(fā)生背景、文藝觀、美學(xué)思想三個(gè)方面對孔子與老子的文學(xué)思想進(jìn)行比較。 第一章論述孔子與老子文學(xué)思想的發(fā)生背景。同樣面對動(dòng)蕩的時(shí)代，孔子與老子都積極為救世尋求出路，不同的是孔子希望走“德禮”治國之路，而老子希望走“無為而治”之路。他們選擇道路的不同，源自于他們不同的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)�？鬃油瞥纭叭省⒍Y”，而老子則強(qiáng)調(diào)“道法自然”。 第二章比較孔子與老子的文藝觀。對于文質(zhì)關(guān)系，孔子強(qiáng)調(diào)文質(zhì)統(tǒng)一，老子則強(qiáng)調(diào)重質(zhì)輕文。對于文學(xué)批評標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，孔子推崇中庸的批評標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，而老子推崇“大象無形”的批評標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。對于文學(xué)的社會功用，孔子用“興觀群怨”說充分肯定了文學(xué)藝術(shù)的作用，而老子從人文關(guān)懷的角度，批判了文學(xué)藝術(shù)的作用。 第三章比較孔子與老子的美學(xué)思想�？鬃优c老子都對美善進(jìn)行了論述，孔子強(qiáng)調(diào)美善統(tǒng)一，而老子認(rèn)為美善之間存在矛盾。對于審美標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，孔子看重“仁愛之美”、“中和之美”，而老子看重“本然之美”、“柔弱之美”、“虛靜之美”。
[Abstract]:Confucius and Laozi were the most representative of Confucianism and Taoism in the pre-Qin school of thought, and the literary ideas in their thoughts laid the foundation of ancient Chinese literature. It is of great academic value to make a comparative study of their literary thoughts. This paper compares the literary thoughts of Confucius and Laozi from three aspects: the background of occurrence, the view of literature and art, and the thought of aesthetics. The first chapter discusses the background of the literary thoughts of Confucius and Laozi. In the same turbulent times, Confucius and Laozi both actively seek a way out for saving the world. The difference is that Confucius wants to follow the road of "ethics", and Laozi wants to "govern by doing nothing". The difference in their choice of paths stems from their different philosophical foundations. Confucius respected "benevolence, propriety", while Laozi emphasized "Taoism and nature." The second chapter compares Confucius and Laozi's views on literature and art. As for the relationship between literature and quality, Confucius emphasized the unity of literature and quality, while Laozi stressed that quality was less important than text. For literary criticism standards, Confucius praised the mean of criticism standards, while Laozi praised the "elephant invisible" standards of criticism. As for the social function of literature, Confucius fully affirmed the role of literature and art with the theory of "to enjoy the view of the masses", while Laozi criticized the role of literature and art from the angle of humanistic concern. The third chapter compares the aesthetic thoughts of Confucius and Laozi. Both Confucius and Laozi discussed the beauty and goodness. Confucius emphasized the unity of beauty and kindness, while Laozi thought that there was a contradiction between beauty and goodness. For aesthetic standards, Confucius valued the beauty of benevolence and harmony, while Laozi valued the beauty of nature, the beauty of weakness and the beauty of emptiness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：I206.09;B83-092

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 羊玉祥;老子美學(xué)思想發(fā)微[J];大慶高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);1997年03期

2 蔡靖泉;《老子》的藝術(shù)成就和文學(xué)地位[J];荊州師專學(xué)報(bào);1995年03期

3 陳春燕;;論孔子的文藝美學(xué)觀[J];文學(xué)教育(上);2007年02期

本文編號：1872030