本文選題：《暴風(fēng)雨》 + 喬爾喬內(nèi)��； 參考：《文藝研究》2017年07期

【摘要】：文藝復(fù)興時(shí)期威尼斯畫派的主將之一喬爾喬內(nèi)不僅身世不詳,而且,當(dāng)時(shí)有關(guān)其作品的歷史文獻(xiàn)亦少之又少,甚至瓦薩利在《名藝術(shù)家傳》中的相關(guān)文字也不完全經(jīng)得起推敲。因而,其代表作《暴風(fēng)雨》問(wèn)世五百多年來(lái)引發(fā)出形形色色甚至互相沖突的闡釋,但是,到目前為止尚沒(méi)有一種闡釋是可以讓人完全接受的。喬爾喬內(nèi)的作品神秘難懂由來(lái)已久,而《暴風(fēng)雨》難解的原因就在于難以確定相關(guān)故事的本源。晚近的相關(guān)研究在尋找敘事出處以及具體細(xì)節(jié)的闡釋上有所推進(jìn),不無(wú)啟發(fā),但是,也還是無(wú)法天衣無(wú)縫地解釋該杰作的整體含義。本文列舉和分析有代表性的若干種闡釋意見(jiàn),同時(shí)有針對(duì)性地提出一系列的質(zhì)疑�！侗╋L(fēng)雨》一畫似乎是個(gè)特殊的謎,其闡釋的挑戰(zhàn)性依然會(huì)存在下去。
[Abstract]:One of the main Renaissance Venetian painters, Jorge Gionne, not only had an unknown background, but also had very few historical documents about his works at that time, and even the relevant words of Vasari in the Biography of famous artists did not stand up to scrutiny. For more than 500 years, his masterpiece, the Storm, has given rise to various and even conflicting interpretations, but so far, none of them is completely acceptable. The mystery of Joel Gionne's works is long-old, and the reason why the Storm is difficult to understand is that it is difficult to determine the origin of the story. The recent research on the source of narrative and the interpretation of specific details has been promoted, not without inspiration, but still can not seamlessly explain the overall meaning of the masterpiece. This paper enumerates and analyses some representative views of interpretation and puts forward a series of questions. A picture of "Storm" seems to be a special mystery, and the challenge of its interpretation will remain.
【作者單位】： 上海美術(shù)學(xué)院;北京大學(xué)藝術(shù)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：J205
，

本文編號(hào)：1893338