本文選題：齊白石 + 畢加索　； 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：齊白石和畢加索是上個(gè)世紀(jì)偉大的藝術(shù)家，他們?yōu)楹笕肆粝铝藢氋F的藝術(shù)財(cái)富。這兩個(gè)有自己獨(dú)特藝術(shù)風(fēng)格的畫家，用畫筆為我們描述了東西方兩種截然不同的世界。他們都是在學(xué)習(xí)研究傳統(tǒng)繪畫的基礎(chǔ)上，摸索形成了自己的風(fēng)格。在藝術(shù)的道路上，畢加索和齊白石并不是一帆風(fēng)順的，他們都有低沉期，他們的繪畫作品都曾經(jīng)被外界否定。即便如此，這兩位藝術(shù)大師本著對(duì)藝術(shù)執(zhí)著的熱愛與瘋狂的追求，最終都在畫壇上獨(dú)樹一幟。 齊白石從小家境貧寒，長(zhǎng)大之后才有機(jī)會(huì)接觸到繪畫藝術(shù)。此后由于他對(duì)中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)繪畫的熱愛，通過(guò)多年的努力，幾經(jīng)變化自己的創(chuàng)作手法，形成了獨(dú)特的藝術(shù)語(yǔ)言，描繪出樸實(shí)的現(xiàn)實(shí)世界。畢加索的父親是美術(shù)學(xué)校的教師，他從小是在有藝術(shù)氛圍的家庭中成長(zhǎng)，受到過(guò)良好的藝術(shù)熏陶。他對(duì)藝術(shù)有自己獨(dú)到的見解，反對(duì)學(xué)院派的束縛，主張用個(gè)性化的藝術(shù)語(yǔ)言，為觀眾呈現(xiàn)出一個(gè)與眾不同的精彩世界。 齊白石和畢加索在藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作的選題上有著相似之處。他們的素材都來(lái)源于生活，是身邊熟知的人物和事物。這些事物通過(guò)他們獨(dú)特的藝術(shù)表達(dá)形式，達(dá)到不一樣的藝術(shù)效果。齊白石衰年變法形成“紅花墨葉”畫派，畢加索開創(chuàng)了立體主義畫派，他們都為藝術(shù)的發(fā)展做出了貢獻(xiàn)。齊白石和畢加索對(duì)待藝術(shù)都充滿著熱情，然而他們的藝術(shù)追求卻是全然不同的。齊白石向往的是和諧美好的美，而畢加索追求的是粗狂原始的美。這兩位藝術(shù)家的藝術(shù)追求各不相似，并且他們的藝術(shù)特征都具有鮮明的個(gè)性，這也是他們立足于世界藝術(shù)之林的主要因素。齊白石和畢加索都主張學(xué)習(xí)傳統(tǒng)，，在傳統(tǒng)的基礎(chǔ)上尋求創(chuàng)新。他們沒有重復(fù)前人的道路，齊白石是在前人的基礎(chǔ)上出新，而畢加索是根據(jù)前人的藝術(shù)進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新。 本文主要分為四個(gè)部分，第一部分先對(duì)齊白石和畢加索經(jīng)歷的現(xiàn)實(shí)世界進(jìn)行了研究概括，并概述了兩位藝術(shù)家的生長(zhǎng)環(huán)境和社會(huì)文化環(huán)境。第二部分分析總結(jié)了兩位藝術(shù)家生活的現(xiàn)實(shí)世界對(duì)他們性格的影響，進(jìn)而在他們繪畫方面的表達(dá)形式產(chǎn)生的影響。第三部分比較分析了齊白石和畢加索對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)世界不同的藝術(shù)思考和表達(dá)方式。此外本文還對(duì)比研究了不同和相同藝術(shù)題材在兩位繪畫大師筆下的不同表現(xiàn)。最后在第四部分探討了齊白石和畢加索對(duì)后世的影響。
[Abstract]:Qi Baishi and Picasso were great artists of the last century. These two painters, with their own unique artistic style, use brushes to describe two different worlds between East and West. On the basis of studying and studying traditional painting, they all fumbled into their own style. Picasso and Qi Baishi were not smooth on the art road. They both had a period of depression and their paintings were once denied by the outside world. Even so, the two masters of art in the persistent love and crazy pursuit, eventually unique in the painting world. Qi Baishi grew up from a poor family and grew up to have access to the art of painting. Since then, because of his love of traditional Chinese painting, through many years of efforts, several changes in his creative techniques, formed a unique artistic language, depicting the real world of simplicity. Picasso's father is an art school teacher, he grew up in an artistic atmosphere in the family, has been good art edification. He has his own unique views on art, opposes the bondage of academicians, and advocates the use of individualized artistic language to present an extraordinary and wonderful world to the audience. Qi Baishi and Picasso have similarities in the choice of artistic creation. Their material comes from life, they are familiar with the people and things. These things achieve different artistic effects through their unique artistic expressions. The "Red Flower and Ink Leaf" school was formed by the reform of Qi Baishi's declining years, and Picasso created the Cubism School, which contributed to the development of art. Both Qi Baishi and Picasso are passionate about art, but their artistic pursuits are quite different. Qi Baishi yearns for the beauty of harmony and beauty, while Picasso pursues the primitive beauty of coarseness. The artistic pursuits of these two artists are different, and their artistic characteristics have distinct individuality, which is also the main factor of their standing in the world of art. Both Qi Baishi and Picasso advocate learning from tradition and seeking innovation on the basis of tradition. They did not repeat the previous path, Qi Baishi is based on the predecessor of the new, Picasso is based on the art of innovation. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part studies the real world experienced by Qi Baishi and Picasso, and summarizes the growing environment and social and cultural environment of the two artists. The second part analyzes and summarizes the influence of the real world of the two artists' life on their character, and then on the expression of their painting. The third part compares Qi Baishi and Picasso's artistic thinking and expression of real world. In addition, this paper contrasts and studies the different performance of different and the same art subject matter in the works of the two masters of painting. Finally, in the fourth part, we discuss the influence of Qi Baishi and Picasso on later generations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：J205

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 羅小戍;;學(xué)院派玻璃藝術(shù)中的立體主義傾向[J];美術(shù)大觀;2008年04期

2 蘇洋;;畢加索藝術(shù)風(fēng)格探究[J];美與時(shí)代(中);2013年08期

3 王文灝;《格爾尼卡》的形式與意蘊(yùn)[J];齊魯藝苑;2004年01期

4 吳玉苗;;論卞之琳詩(shī)歌的立體主義特征——以《水成巖》為例[J];青年文學(xué)家;2013年05期

5 王銀明;;淺析《格爾尼卡》的悲劇性色彩[J];文教資料;2008年09期

6 李魁;;畢加索的創(chuàng)造性人格[J];藝術(shù)教育;2012年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 蘇翠虹;后印象主義繪畫語(yǔ)言中簡(jiǎn)約特征的研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2011年

2 楊天嬰;現(xiàn)代繪畫對(duì)現(xiàn)代設(shè)計(jì)的引導(dǎo)——從古典情懷到機(jī)器之美[D];南京師范大學(xué);2003年

3 虞英;從現(xiàn)代藝術(shù)視野闡釋建筑設(shè)計(jì)過(guò)程的非定式思考　[D];江南大學(xué);2004年

4 王文灝;《格爾尼卡》的形式與意蘊(yùn)[D];山東師范大學(xué);2004年

5 劉瑩;早期現(xiàn)代主義藝術(shù)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

6 郭雯;精神與存在[D];中國(guó)藝術(shù)研究院;2010年

7 陳梅;天真與純情[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2012年

8 孫霽;西方繪畫中時(shí)間因素的隱蔽與顯現(xiàn)[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2012年

9 王云菲;勒·柯布西耶的繪畫與建筑關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[D];沈陽(yáng)建筑大學(xué);2012年

10 侯欣;解讀塞尚[D];青島科技大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1878610