本文選題：豪澤爾 + 唯物史觀��； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：豪澤爾以總體性視角將馬克思主義唯物史觀與藝術(shù)社會史研究相結(jié)合,通過藝術(shù)與社會范疇的互動,多元審視藝術(shù)內(nèi)部和外部不同因素,對各個歷史時期的藝術(shù)風(fēng)格進(jìn)行了深入分析與探討。豪澤爾所指的社會范疇包括政治、文化以及市場因素等方面。就政治維度而言,豪澤爾借鑒了馬克思對社會的分析,從社會制度和階級出發(fā),考察了不同的社會制度和階級對藝術(shù)風(fēng)格的影響。而在文化維度方面,豪澤爾主要從哲學(xué)、宗教、科學(xué)、心理學(xué)等因素分析藝術(shù)風(fēng)格產(chǎn)生的原因。他認(rèn)為文化因素影響人們看待世界的方式,而藝術(shù)是人們世界觀的表達(dá),因此文化因素不僅影響藝術(shù)題材、主題的選擇,也決定著藝術(shù)具體的表達(dá)方式。在市場因素方面,藝術(shù)是社會中的生產(chǎn),后被流通和消費,藝術(shù)風(fēng)格的形成受到文化運作體系的制約。豪澤爾把藝術(shù)家視為藝術(shù)生產(chǎn)中的一部分,考察了文化運作體系從藝術(shù)贊助為主到自由市場形成過程中藝術(shù)風(fēng)格的轉(zhuǎn)變。豪澤爾藝術(shù)社會史理論總體上是以馬克思主義的唯物史觀為理論基礎(chǔ)。在他看來,不僅藝術(shù)表達(dá)依賴物質(zhì)材料,藝術(shù)本身也是人們意識的產(chǎn)物,是現(xiàn)實社會影響的結(jié)果。豪澤爾同時也指出藝術(shù)與社會之間并非直接的因果關(guān)系,藝術(shù)當(dāng)然有自身的審美價值和發(fā)展規(guī)律。因此,他的藝術(shù)史研究非常重視時空的整一性,以此對人類不同歷史時期的藝術(shù)風(fēng)格產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展的原因展開精確分析。除此之外,豪澤爾也重視藝術(shù)的意識形態(tài)問題,他分析了不同歷史時期人們的藝術(shù)評價中意識形態(tài)的作用,并進(jìn)一步認(rèn)為,藝術(shù)史在某種程度上就是意識形態(tài)史。豪澤爾藝術(shù)社會史的意義體現(xiàn)在藝術(shù)史發(fā)展脈絡(luò)中。通過將藝術(shù)置于其產(chǎn)生的社會環(huán)境中進(jìn)行考察,他使藝術(shù)史研究不再局限于對藝術(shù)自律性和形式規(guī)律的解讀,改進(jìn)了之前主流的形式主義藝術(shù)史研究范式。另外,豪澤爾并沒有為藝術(shù)與社會因素之間固定聯(lián)系所束縛,而是將藝術(shù)視為一個復(fù)雜的整體,從不同藝術(shù)家具體的階級身份、社會境況等出發(fā)展開分析,將早期馬克思主義藝術(shù)社會史研究推向巔峰。豪澤爾在突破舊有傳統(tǒng)的基礎(chǔ)上,對藝術(shù)生產(chǎn)體制、精英文化與大眾文化、藝術(shù)的商品屬性等的理論分析無疑啟發(fā)了后世藝術(shù)社會史研究。
[Abstract]:Hauser combines Marxist historical materialism with the study of social history of art from the perspective of totality. Through the interaction between art and social category, he examines the internal and external factors of art. The art style of each historical period is deeply analyzed and discussed. Hauser refers to social categories including political, cultural and market factors. As far as the political dimension is concerned, Hauser draws lessons from Marx's analysis of society and examines the influence of different social systems and classes on artistic style from the point of view of social system and class. In terms of cultural dimension, Hauser mainly analyzes the causes of artistic style from philosophy, religion, science, psychology and other factors. He believes that cultural factors affect the way people view the world, and art is the expression of people's world outlook. Therefore, cultural factors not only affect the choice of art themes and themes, but also determine the specific expression of art. In the aspect of market factors, art is the production in society, which is later circulated and consumed. The formation of artistic style is restricted by the system of cultural operation. Hauser regarded artists as a part of art production and examined the change of artistic style from art sponsorship to free market formation. Hauser's theory of social history of art is based on Marxist historical materialism. In his opinion, not only art expression depends on material, but art itself is the product of people's consciousness and the result of social influence. Hauser also pointed out that there is no direct causal relationship between art and society, and art certainly has its own aesthetic value and development law. Therefore, his study of art history attaches great importance to the unity of time and space, so as to carry out an accurate analysis of the reasons for the emergence and development of the artistic style in different historical periods of mankind. In addition, Hauser also attached importance to the ideological problem of art. He analyzed the role of ideology in people's art evaluation in different historical periods, and further thought that art history is ideological history to some extent. The significance of Hauser's social history of art is embodied in the development of art history. By examining art in its social environment, he made the study of art history no longer limited to the interpretation of art self-discipline and formal law, and improved the former mainstream formalism art history research paradigm. In addition, Hauser was not bound by the fixed relationship between art and social factors, but regarded art as a complex whole, analyzing the specific class status and social situation of different artists. To the peak of the study of the early Marxist social history of art. On the basis of breaking through the old tradition, Hauser's theoretical analysis of the art production system, elite culture and popular culture, and the commodity attribute of art undoubtedly inspired the study of the history of art society in later generations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：J110.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉向娟;;建構(gòu)藝術(shù)史與社會發(fā)展的宏觀圖卷——評豪澤爾《藝術(shù)社會史》[J];文藝研究;2016年10期

2 魯紹臣;;差異的命定論邏輯——佩里·安德森的歷史唯物主義思想探微[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年05期

3 范麗甍;;從藝術(shù)社會史到藝術(shù)社會學(xué)——阿諾德·豪澤爾學(xué)術(shù)思想述評[J];南京社會科學(xué);2016年04期

4 馮白帆;王宇;;阿諾德·豪澤爾《藝術(shù)社會學(xué)》研究述評[J];美與時代(下);2014年03期

5 方維規(guī);;“中間道路”的藝術(shù)史觀——豪澤爾藝術(shù)社會學(xué)思想探析[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2013年04期

6 沈語冰;;藝術(shù)社會史的前世今生——兼論貢布里希對豪澤爾的批評[J];新美術(shù);2012年01期

7 劉向娟;;豪澤爾:社會藝術(shù)史的先行者[J];榮寶齋;2011年06期

8 劉懷英;;也談作為社會意識的藝術(shù)——再讀阿諾德·豪澤爾的《藝術(shù)社會學(xué)》[J];美與時代(下半月);2008年11期

9 彭海云;;阿諾德·豪澤爾的藝術(shù)社會學(xué)理論及其現(xiàn)代意義[J];中山大學(xué)研究生學(xué)刊(社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

10 曹意強;歐美藝術(shù)史學(xué)史與方法論[J];新美術(shù);2001年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉向娟;藝術(shù)史的社會學(xué)視域[D];上海大學(xué);2014年

2 馮白帆;建構(gòu)與影響[D];南京藝術(shù)學(xué)院;2014年

，

本文編號：1995430