本文選題：城市公園 + 人工植物群落��； 參考：《河南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以鄭州城市公園為研究對(duì)象,選取市內(nèi)8個(gè)公園中的115個(gè)典型人工植物群落,對(duì)植物群落的物種組成、植物來(lái)源、植物群落類型、垂直結(jié)構(gòu)層次、群落景觀外貌特征、群落物種多樣性等進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。并用層次分析法從生態(tài)功能、空間結(jié)構(gòu)、視覺(jué)質(zhì)量、社會(huì)服務(wù)四個(gè)方面選用16個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)因子,建立合理的評(píng)價(jià)體系,對(duì)8個(gè)公園的植物群落綜合景觀進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),及對(duì)5個(gè)公園中的I級(jí)景觀進(jìn)行物種組成、配置特點(diǎn)等的分析。最后,基于對(duì)鄭州城市公園人工植物群落的研究結(jié)果,提出科學(xué)合理的優(yōu)化措施。研究的主要結(jié)果為以下幾個(gè)方面:1、物種組成。通過(guò)對(duì)鄭州市8個(gè)公園的調(diào)查,維管植物共153種,63科120屬。其中喬木的種類最為豐富,共57種,灌木49種,草本41種,藤本類的植物最少共6種。根據(jù)《中國(guó)植被》中的植物群落分類原則,將115個(gè)植物群落劃分為8種植被類型,其中落葉闊葉林有57個(gè),針闊混交林有18個(gè),常綠針葉林有15個(gè),常綠落葉闊葉林有14個(gè),常綠闊葉林有5個(gè),棕櫚類林有3個(gè),落葉有2個(gè),竹類林有1個(gè)。2、物種豐富度。各公園物種豐富度指數(shù)的排列順序?yàn)?植物園綠博園人民公園碧沙崗公園鄭州之林紫荊山公園濕地公園森林公園。不同人工植物群落類型的豐富度排序?yàn)?常綠落葉闊葉林針闊混交林落葉闊葉林常綠針葉林常綠闊葉林落葉針葉林。垂直結(jié)構(gòu)類型豐富度指數(shù)排序?yàn)?喬灌草喬灌灌草喬草。3、物種多樣性。各公園中Simpson多樣性指數(shù)和Shannon-wiener多樣性指數(shù)表現(xiàn)基本一致,喬木的多樣性指數(shù)都在0.35以上,最高的為植物園。不同群落類型的多樣性指數(shù)最高的為常綠落葉闊葉林。不同結(jié)構(gòu)類型中,喬灌草結(jié)構(gòu)的多樣性指數(shù)最高。各公園的均勻度指數(shù)在0.3~0.91之間,喬灌草的均勻度排序?yàn)?喬木層灌木層草本層。不同群落類型的喬木層中均勻度指數(shù)與多樣性指數(shù)排序一致。垂直結(jié)構(gòu)類型中喬木層均勻度指數(shù)最高的為喬灌草類型。4、景觀評(píng)價(jià)。運(yùn)用層次分析法法對(duì)115個(gè)人工植物群落景觀進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià),得出I級(jí)景觀共有9個(gè),占8%;II、III級(jí)景觀共94個(gè),占82%;IV級(jí)景觀共有12個(gè),占10%。說(shuō)明鄭州城市公園人工植物群落綜合景觀處于中等偏上水平,從整體上來(lái)看,植物園和人民公園的綜合景觀質(zhì)量水平較高,森林公園的最差。5、景觀優(yōu)化措施。從體現(xiàn)當(dāng)?shù)靥厣参锞坝^、提高生態(tài)效益、加強(qiáng)景觀觀賞性、合理引種植物資源等方面提出景觀優(yōu)化措施。通過(guò)本文對(duì)鄭州市公園人工植物群落的統(tǒng)計(jì)與分析,對(duì)公園植物群落的景觀評(píng)價(jià),為以后構(gòu)建具有當(dāng)?shù)靥厣参锞坝^、穩(wěn)定的人工植物群落提供參考實(shí)例和理論基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Taking Zhengzhou City Park as the research object, this paper selects 115 typical artificial plant communities of 8 parks in the city, and analyses the species composition, plant origin, plant community type, vertical structure level, landscape features of community landscape, community species diversity and so on. Constructs, visual quality, social service four aspects select 16 evaluation factors, establish a reasonable evaluation system, evaluate the comprehensive landscape of plant community in 8 parks, and analyze the species composition and configuration characteristics of the I grade landscape in the 5 parks. Finally, based on the results of the study on the artificial plant community in Zhengzhou City Park, the author puts forward the Department. The main results of the study are as follows: 1, species composition. Through the investigation of 8 parks in Zhengzhou, 153 species of vascular plants and 63 families and 120 genera are found. Among them, the species are the most abundant, 57 species, 49 shrubs, 41 herbs, and the least 6 species of vines. According to the classification of plant communities in China Vegetation In principle, 115 plant communities are divided into 8 types of vegetation, of which there are 57 deciduous broad-leaved forests, 18 coniferous broad-leaved forests, 15 evergreen coniferous forests, 14 evergreen deciduous broad-leaved forests, 5 evergreen broad-leaved forests, 3 palm forests, 2 deciduous forests, 1.2, species richness. The sequence order of species richness index of each park. Green Botanical Park, botanical garden, green Botanical Park, bauhinigan Park, Zhengzhou forest Forest Park Wetland Park. The richness of different artificial plant community types: evergreen deciduous broad-leaved forest, broadleaf forest, evergreen broadleaf forest, evergreen broadleaf coniferous forest. The richness index of vertical structure type is Qiao Guan. The diversity of Simpson diversity index and Shannon-wiener diversity index in each park are basically the same. The diversity index of the trees is above 0.35, the highest is in the botanical garden. The highest diversity index of different community types is evergreen deciduous broad-leaved forest. Among the different structural types, the structure of Jo grasses. The evenness index of each park is between 0.3~0.91, the evenness of the arbor layer is: the tree layer shrub layer herbaceous layer. The evenness index of the tree layer of different community types is the same with the diversity index. The highest tree layer evenness index in the vertical structure type is.4, landscape evaluation. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was used to evaluate the landscape of 115 artificial plant communities. It was found that there were 9 I landscapes, accounting for 8%, II and III, accounting for 82% and 12 IV landscapes, accounting for 10%. that the comprehensive landscape of the artificial plant community in Zhengzhou city park was in the medium level, and the overall view of the botanical garden and the people's Park was a comprehensive view. High level of view quality, the worst.5 of Forest Park, landscape optimization measures. The landscape optimization measures are put forward from the aspects of reflecting local characteristics of plant landscape, improving ecological benefits, strengthening landscape ornamentability and rational introduction of plant resources. Through the statistics and analysis of the artificial plant colony in Zhengzhou Park, the landscape evaluation of the plant community in the park is evaluated. The price provides a reference case and theoretical basis for the construction of a stable plant community with local characteristics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：S688;TU986.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 通訊員 孫敏;蘇州河兩側(cè)綠化要形成標(biāo)志性綠地[N];聯(lián)合時(shí)報(bào);2001年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 王永華;浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué)東湖校區(qū)人工植物群落結(jié)構(gòu)與生態(tài)保健效應(yīng)研究[D];浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué);2012年

2 王彥華;河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)東校區(qū)綠地人工植物群落景觀評(píng)價(jià)[D];河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

3 許偉;無(wú)錫市城市生態(tài)綠地人工植物群落結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

4 邵燕;蘇州市現(xiàn)代城市綠地人工植物群落結(jié)構(gòu)研究與評(píng)價(jià)[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

5 王萬(wàn)平;武漢市公園綠地人工植物群落特征及景觀評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

6 劉宏彬;環(huán)城綠帶（南匯段）人工植物群落現(xiàn)狀分析與評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

7 陳福美;蘇州市主城區(qū)道路綠地人工植物群落調(diào)查研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

8 張輝;礦業(yè)廢棄地裸露坡面人工植物群落構(gòu)建及對(duì)基質(zhì)性質(zhì)的影響[D];安徽大學(xué);2011年

9 王軍鴿;鄭州城市公園人工植物群落特征與景觀評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];河南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1995317