隱喻作為一種常見的語言手段自柏拉圖,亞里斯多德等人以來一直備受學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)注。由于受當(dāng)代哲學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)變影響及來自認(rèn)知語言學(xué)新的發(fā)展,隱喻已經(jīng)完成從一種修辭手法轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橐环N人類基礎(chǔ)的認(rèn)知模式。雖然認(rèn)知語言學(xué)創(chuàng)始人蘭考夫從隱喻研究認(rèn)知轉(zhuǎn)向開始后就一直對這方面進(jìn)行強(qiáng)調(diào),但形式多樣的社會語篇之間,尤其是西方文化與中文之間存在的不同的隱喻,這方面的問題目前尚未得到充分解決。隱喻與政治之間的密切關(guān)系可以追溯到古希臘的政治修辭,然而中美政治語篇中概念英語的研究得到了很大程度上的忽略,因此這方面的探索微乎其微。作為一種類比推理,隱喻對于政治語篇而言非常必要,能充分展現(xiàn)說服力。本文通過對2011年溫家寶政府工作報告以及2011奧巴馬國情咨文演說進(jìn)行對比研究,試圖對中美政治隱喻存在的不同模式及在文本中如何得到運(yùn)用進(jìn)行探究。首先,本文對國內(nèi)外的相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行了回顧。第二,對中美政治語篇進(jìn)行對比分析,指出它們之間的異同。第三,本文對差異及相同進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步研究,從而弄清同大于異,還是異大于同。第四,本文將對中美政治語篇中存在的異同原因進(jìn)行分析。同時對隱喻的功能進(jìn)行了概況和總結(jié)。最后,得出結(jié)論。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),兩個政治語篇中存在一些類... 

【文章來源】：杭州師范大學(xué)浙江省

【文章頁數(shù)】：67 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgement
摘要
Abstract
Contents
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Study Background
    1.2 Objectives and Significance of the Study
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 The Traditional Metaphor Theory
    2.2 The Contemporary Views of Metaphor
        2.2.1 Cognitie Approach to Metaphor
        2.2.2 The Classification of Conceptual Metaphor
    2.3 The Systematicity of Conceptual Metaphor
    2.4 The Universality and Cultural Variation of Metaphor
    2.5 An Overview of Related Concpetual Metaphor Studies
        2.5.1 Related Studies abroad
        2.5.2 Related Studies in China
Chapter Three A Comparative Analysis on the Conceptual MetaphorsPolitical Discourses
    3.1 The Conceptual Metaphors in the Chinese Political Discourse
        3.1.1 The "Journey" Metaphors
        3.1.2 The "War" Metaphors
        3.1.3 The "Construction" Metaphors
        3.1.4 The "Family" Metaphors
        3.1.5 The "Organism" Metaphors
    3.2 The Conceptual Metapors in the American Political Discourse
        3.2.1 The "Joureny" Metaphors
        3.2.2 The "War" Metaphors
        3.2.3 The "Construction" Metaphors
        3.2.4 The "Family" Metaphors
        3.2.5 The "Organism" Metaphors
    3.3 Discussion on Conceptual Metaphors in Two Discourses
    3.4 Unique Conceptual Metaphors in the Two Discourses
        3.4.1 Unique Metaphors in Chinese Political Discourse
        3.4.2 Unique Metaphors in American Political Discourse
Chapter Four Accounts for the Similarities and Differences of ConceptualMetaphors in American and Chinese Political Discourses
    4.1 Explanations of the Similarities of Conceptual Metaphors
    4.2 Explanation of the Differences of Conceptual Metaphors
    4.3 Functions of Conceptual Metaphors in the Selected Political Discourese
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 The Major Findings of the Study
    5.2 The Limitations and Suggestions
Bibliography



本文編號：2963581