漢維語篇章銜接方式的對比研究
[Abstract]:The basic function of language is social communication, and in practical communication, the basic unit of language is text. However, the previous research on Uygur mainly takes pronunciation, vocabulary and sentences as the research objects, and reveals the laws and characteristics of Uygur pronunciation, vocabulary and sentences from different angles and levels. However, there are few studies on the Uygur text level by using the knowledge of modern linguistics and the methods of discourse research at home and abroad, especially the contrastive study of Chinese and Uygur text cohesion. With the development of bilingual education, the development of bilingual teaching materials and the enhancement of the demand for translation between Chinese and Uygur, in view of the fact that text cohesion plays an important role in text construction, and in view of the fact that the study of Uygur text cohesion is almost blank, the author chooses the comparison of Chinese and Uygur text cohesion as the starting point of this paper, and compares and summarizes the similarities and differences of Chinese and Uygur text cohesion. This paper analyzes the role of text cohesion in the construction and interpretation of Chinese and Uygur texts. The paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which summarizes the research problems, the purpose of the study, the significance of the study, the corpus and research methods of the paper, as well as the research status. The second chapter summarizes the structural cohesion and defines the related concepts, and classifies and summarizes the main types of structural cohesion in Chinese and Uygur. This paper mainly compares and analyzes the structural cohesion of omissions, substitution and reference in Chinese and Uygur texts, and summarizes their similarities and differences. The third chapter explains the related concepts of logical cohesion, classifies and compares the types of logical cohesion between Chinese and Uygur in detail, studies the similarities and differences of logical cohesion in Chinese and Uygur, and analyzes its causes. The fourth chapter explains the important position of lexical cohesion in the text, and on the basis of a large number of Chinese and Uygur text corpus, makes a contrastive study of lexical cohesion such as the recurrence relationship and the present relationship in the Chinese and Uygur texts. In the repetition relationship, the repetition, synonymous relationship, upper and lower semantic relationship and generalization words are mainly compared, while the antonym relationship, complementary relationship, local-global relationship and combination-collocation relationship are mainly compared in the present relationship. The fifth chapter is the conclusion of the paper. This part summarizes the problems existing in the study of Chinese and Uygur text cohesion and the aspects of further research that should be continued and strengthened.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:新疆師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:H146;H215
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊朝軍;照應(yīng)關(guān)系的篇章功能研究[J];福建外語;2002年04期
2 劉云江;篇章詞匯銜接的語義分析[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年06期
3 李一平;有關(guān)篇章分析與漢語篇章連接成分的幾個問題[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期
4 周四瑗;英漢語互譯中邏輯連接的對比研究[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年04期
5 胡培安,王巖;轉(zhuǎn)折句的邏輯語義關(guān)系[J];黃河科技大學(xué)學(xué)報;2000年03期
6 彭湃;現(xiàn)代漢語因果關(guān)系連接成分研究綜述[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2004年02期
7 李美華;科學(xué)篇章中相鄰語義段間的邏輯銜接[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年04期
8 王志文;詞匯銜接與語篇[J];解放軍外語學(xué)院學(xué)報;1994年05期
9 何曉琴;論英語語篇的形合法與語篇模式[J];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2002年06期
10 吳若愚;;新疆少數(shù)民族學(xué)生漢語篇章敘述人稱指稱偏誤分析[J];民族教育研究;2007年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 孫瑜;論語篇銜接[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2002年
2 王大方;語篇中的詞匯銜接模式及其連貫建構(gòu)功能[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2005年
3 王玲;漢維篇章邏輯銜接關(guān)系對比研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2006年
4 喬晶;語篇銜接理論新探[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2007年
5 羅春宏;現(xiàn)代漢語篇章中的總結(jié)關(guān)系連接成分[D];南昌大學(xué);2007年
6 潘艷蘭;論維吾爾語篇章的銜接問題[D];喀什師范學(xué)院;2008年
本文編號:2503834
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2503834.html