【摘要】：無論對(duì)于系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)還是對(duì)于隱喻研究而言，，語法隱喻的重要性都日益為人們所認(rèn)可。語法隱喻是科技語篇中的重要現(xiàn)象，該理論是系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)家韓禮德于1985年在其著作《功能語法導(dǎo)論》中提出的，是指語言表達(dá)形式上的隱喻化，它闡述了多種方式表達(dá)一個(gè)命題的語法功能。語法隱喻具有表達(dá)簡練、客觀及濃縮信息等功能。語法隱喻在科技語篇中集中體現(xiàn)為名詞化和動(dòng)詞化，而名詞化和動(dòng)詞化的應(yīng)用使科技語篇具有了較強(qiáng)的邏輯性，同時(shí)也非常具有說服力，產(chǎn)生較好的認(rèn)知效果，因此這一理論逐漸受到國內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)界的關(guān)注。 根據(jù)語言的三大純理功能，語言隱喻最初被分為三種類型：概念語法隱喻，人際語法隱喻，篇章語法隱喻。而后韓禮德為完善這一理論，提出語法隱喻綜合癥的概念，并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出13種語法隱喻類型。本文旨在分析語法隱喻在英漢科技語篇中所起的重要作用，從而更好地完成英漢科技語篇中語法隱喻現(xiàn)象的轉(zhuǎn)換。 論文首先介紹了研究的目的和意義、研究方法以及本文的結(jié)構(gòu)；其次回顧了語法隱喻理論20年來國內(nèi)外的發(fā)展情況，重點(diǎn)強(qiáng)調(diào)了韓禮德對(duì)語法隱喻理論的貢獻(xiàn)；再次，本文闡述了科技語篇簡潔、客觀、信息密度大等語言特點(diǎn)，語法隱喻這一手段的介入有助實(shí)現(xiàn)這些特點(diǎn)；接下來介紹了語料的收集方法，分析過程和統(tǒng)計(jì)結(jié)果，分析表明語法隱喻大量存在于英漢科技語篇中，而且存在的形式幾乎相同。在此基礎(chǔ)上，本文提出了語法隱喻在語篇中的功能，并提出漢語中的一致式與英文中的隱喻式在轉(zhuǎn)換時(shí)的對(duì)接，同時(shí)重點(diǎn)討論名詞化和動(dòng)詞化同級(jí)轉(zhuǎn)換和升級(jí)轉(zhuǎn)換；最后，對(duì)本論文的研究結(jié)果進(jìn)行總結(jié)。 本文以語法隱喻為理論框架，對(duì)比分析13種語法隱喻類型在英漢科技語篇中存在的異同，以便提出有效方式來完成英漢科技語篇中的語法隱喻的相互轉(zhuǎn)換。文中重點(diǎn)討論了語法隱喻在英漢科技語篇中的兩種重要體現(xiàn)形式，即名詞化和動(dòng)詞化的轉(zhuǎn)換。雖然本文在語法隱喻系統(tǒng)研究方面貢獻(xiàn)微薄，但作者希望本文在科技語篇中語法隱喻的具體表現(xiàn)形式、功能及英漢科技語篇的跨文化交流等方面能起到一定的指導(dǎo)作用，對(duì)英漢科技語篇中語法隱喻的轉(zhuǎn)換也能具有一定程度上的指導(dǎo)意義。但至于科技語篇中語法隱喻的其他表現(xiàn)方式，及英漢科技語篇中語法隱喻轉(zhuǎn)換的其他對(duì)策，則有待今后進(jìn)一步研究。
[Abstract]:The importance of grammatical metaphor is increasingly recognized both for systemic functional linguistics and for metaphor research. Grammatical metaphor is an important phenomenon in scientific and technological discourse. this theory was put forward by Halliday, a systematic functional linguist, in his book introduction to functional Grammar in 1985. It refers to the metaphorization of language expression. It expounds the grammatical function of expressing a proposition in many ways. Grammatical metaphor has the functions of concise expression, objective and condensed information. Grammatical metaphor is embodied in science and technology discourse as nominalization and verb, and the application of nominalization and verb makes science and technology discourse have strong logic, but also very persuasive, and has a good cognitive effect, so this theory has been paid more and more attention by the academic circles at home and abroad. According to the three pure functions of language, language metaphor is initially divided into three types: conceptual grammatical metaphor, interpersonal grammatical metaphor and textual grammatical metaphor. In order to perfect this theory, Halliday put forward the concept of grammatical metaphor syndrome, and on this basis, he put forward 13 types of grammatical metaphor. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the important role of grammatical metaphor in English and Chinese scientific and technological discourses, so as to better complete the transformation of grammatical metaphors in English and Chinese scientific and technological discourses. This paper first introduces the purpose and significance of the study, the research methods and the structure of this paper; secondly, it reviews the development of grammatical metaphor theory at home and abroad in the past 20 years, with emphasis on Halliday's contribution to grammatical metaphor theory; thirdly, this paper expounds the linguistic characteristics of scientific and technological discourse, such as simplicity, objectivity and high information density, and the intervention of grammatical metaphor is helpful to realize these characteristics. Then it introduces the collection methods, analysis process and statistical results of corpus. The analysis shows that grammatical metaphors exist in a large number of English and Chinese scientific and technological discourses, and the forms are almost the same. On this basis, this paper puts forward the function of grammatical metaphor in the text, and puts forward the docking between the consistent form in Chinese and the metaphorical form in English, with emphasis on nominalization and verb transformation at the same level and upgrading transformation. Finally, the research results of this paper are summarized. Based on the theoretical framework of grammatical metaphor, this paper makes a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences between 13 types of grammatical metaphor in English and Chinese scientific and technological discourses, in order to propose effective ways to complete the transformation of grammatical metaphors in English and Chinese scientific and technological discourses. This paper focuses on two important forms of grammatical metaphor in English and Chinese scientific and technological discourses, that is, the transformation of nominalization and verb. Although this paper has contributed little to the systematic study of grammatical metaphor, the author hopes that this paper will play a guiding role in the specific forms and functions of grammatical metaphor in scientific and technological discourse and the cross-cultural communication between English and Chinese scientific and technological discourse, and will also have guiding significance for the transformation of grammatical metaphor in English and Chinese scientific and technological discourse to a certain extent. However, other expressions of grammatical metaphor in science and technology discourse and other countermeasures for the transformation of grammatical metaphor in English and Chinese science and technology discourses need to be further studied in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H314;H146


本文編號(hào)：2502118