【摘要】：趨向補語是老撾學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)漢語的難點，老撾語言中雖然存在著和漢語趨向補語類似的結(jié)構(gòu)，但老撾學(xué)生對于趨向補語的使用仍然具有較高的偏誤率和多種偏誤類型。本文從漢語和老撾語對比入手，，從結(jié)構(gòu)形式和語義兩方面對漢語趨向補語及其老撾語中的對應(yīng)表達形式進行了詳細的對比分析，找出二者之間的相同點和不同點，然后將收集到的老撾學(xué)生的趨向補語的偏誤按照結(jié)構(gòu)類型分為誤加、遺漏、誤代、錯序、雜糅等五種，并進一步從母語的負遷移、漢語語法規(guī)則的泛化、教學(xué)教材的誤導(dǎo)或不足幾個方面分析這些偏誤背后的成因，最后提出了相應(yīng)的教學(xué)策略，希望能對老撾學(xué)生的漢語趨向補語教學(xué)有一定幫助，為老撾學(xué)生的課堂教學(xué)和教材編寫提供參考。
[Abstract]:Trend complement is a difficult point for Lao students to learn Chinese. Although there is a similar structure to Chinese directional complement in Lao language, Lao students still have a high error rate and many types of errors in the use of directional complement. Starting with the contrast between Chinese and Lao, this paper makes a detailed contrastive analysis of Chinese directional complement and its corresponding expressions in Lao language from the aspects of structure and semantics, and finds out the similarities and differences between the two. Then, according to the structure type, the errors of the trend complement collected by Lao students are divided into five types, that is, false addition, omission, misinterpretation, misorder, hybridity, and further negative transfer from their mother tongue and generalization of Chinese grammar rules. This paper analyzes the causes behind these errors in several aspects of misleading or insufficient teaching materials, and finally puts forward corresponding teaching strategies, hoping to be helpful to Lao students' Chinese trend complement teaching. It provides reference for Lao students' classroom teaching and textbook compilation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H195

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 蔣重母;鄧海霞;付金艷;;老撾漢語教學(xué)現(xiàn)狀研究[J];東南亞研究;2010年06期

2 火sト

本文編號：2395280