【摘要】：《抱樸子》,東晉葛洪著,分內(nèi)、外篇兩部分,是重要的中古漢語研究材料,特別是其《內(nèi)篇》多時代感強(qiáng)的口語語料。目前對《抱樸子》語言的研究還不夠深入,對于其疑問句的研究更是薄弱。故選取《抱樸子》中的疑問句作為研究對象,對其進(jìn)行靜態(tài)描寫與對比分析,揭示《抱樸子》一書的疑問句特色,力圖為漢語語法史與句法史的建設(shè)做出一些努力。 論文主要內(nèi)容如下： 緒論部分介紹葛洪及《抱樸子》其人其書,梳理中古漢語疑問句研究成果,并對《抱樸子》語料及研究方法作簡要說明。 第一章到第二章,《抱樸子》疑問句概貌描寫�？偨Y(jié)各家疑問句的分類方法,結(jié)合《抱樸子》語料的特點(diǎn),將疑問句分為詢問句和反問句兩部分,再根據(jù)每一類問句的句法語義特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行再分類。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn)：詢問句中是非問句主要借助疑問語氣詞表達(dá),有使用語氣副詞和不使用語氣副詞兩種情況；正反問句沿用“VP-Neg”格式；選擇問句有范圍選擇問句和列項(xiàng)選擇問句兩類；特指問句使用了一些中古新生新興的疑問詞語,如“云何”、“何緣”等。反問句數(shù)量多,類型多樣。 第三章,《抱樸子》疑問句中疑問詞使用情況。疑問詞包括疑問代詞、疑問副詞和疑問語氣詞三部分,疑問詞的使用表現(xiàn)為與疑問句類型相對應(yīng)。其中,疑問代詞主要用于特指問句和反問句的構(gòu)成,疑問副詞集中用于反問句中,而語氣詞則參與各種疑問句型的構(gòu)成,表達(dá)多種疑問語氣。疑問代詞以“何”的使用為代表,疑問副詞大量使用“豈”“可”,語氣詞有單用和連用兩種形式�？傮w特點(diǎn)是兼收并蓄,呈過渡狀態(tài)。 第四章,《抱樸子》疑問句對比研究。選取中古時期有代表性的中土文獻(xiàn)《論衡》、《世說新語》、《顏氏家訓(xùn)》等進(jìn)行歷時比較,揭示《抱樸子》疑問句在歷時發(fā)展中的特點(diǎn),具體表現(xiàn)為：①《抱樸子》疑問句類型齊全,體系完備。②《抱樸子》疑問句的歷時漢語中的過渡性質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:Bao Puzi, by GE Hong in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, divided into two parts, is an important research material of Middle Ancient Chinese, especially its oral materials which have a strong sense of the times. At present, the research on the language of Pu Puzi is not deep enough, and the research on its interrogative sentence is even weaker. Therefore, the interrogative sentence in Huo Puzi is selected as the object of study, and its static description and comparative analysis are carried out to reveal the features of the interrogative sentence in the book, in order to make some efforts for the construction of the history of Chinese grammar and syntax. The main contents of the thesis are as follows: the introduction part introduces GE Hong and Bao Puzi's book, combs the research achievements of the middle ancient Chinese interrogative sentences, and briefly explains the corpus and research methods. Chapter one to Chapter two, the description of question sentences. This paper summarizes the classification methods of each interrogative sentence and classifies the interrogative sentence into two parts: interrogative sentence and rhetorical question sentence according to the characteristics of the corpus, and then reclassifies the interrogative sentence according to the syntactic and semantic characteristics of each type of question sentence. Through the research, it is found that the right and wrong question sentences in interrogative sentences are mainly expressed by interrogative mood adverbs, and there are two situations in which mood adverbs are used and mood adverbs are not used, while positive and negative questions are in the form of "VP-Neg". There are two types of selective questions: selective question and item selective question, especially the question uses some new and emerging interrogative words, such as "cloud", "what's the fate" and so on. The number of rhetorical sentences is many and the types are various. The third chapter is about the use of interrogative words in the interrogative sentence. Interrogative words include interrogative pronouns, interrogative adverbs and interrogative modal words. The use of interrogative words corresponds to the type of interrogative sentences. Among them, interrogative pronouns are mainly used in the formation of specific questions and rhetorical questions, interrogative adverbs are mainly used in rhetorical questions, while modal pronouns participate in the formation of various interrogative sentence patterns and express various interrogative moods. The interrogative pronoun is represented by the use of "he", the interrogative adverb uses "whether" or "can" extensively, and the mood word has two forms: single use and combination. The overall characteristics are eclectic, transition state. Chapter four: a Contrastive study of Questionals in Huo Puzi. In order to reveal the characteristics of the diachronic development of the interrogative sentences in the Diachronic period, the representative middle earth literature of the Middle Ancient period, "Luoheng", "Shi Shuo Xin Yu", "Yan's Family instructions" and so on, were selected for diachronic comparison. The concrete manifestations are as follows: (1) the interrogative sentences are of complete types and the system is complete. 2 the transitive nature of the interrogative sentences in the diachronic Chinese.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H141

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董玉芝;《抱樸子》復(fù)音詞在現(xiàn)代漢語中的變化[J];西部學(xué)壇;1998年01期

2 劉光明;;《顏氏家訓(xùn)》疑問句考察[J];池州學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年06期

3 郭錫良;先秦語氣詞新探(二)[J];古漢語研究;1989年01期

4 江藍(lán)生;疑問副詞“可”探源[J];古漢語研究;1990年03期

5 劉曉南;先秦語氣詞的歷時多義現(xiàn)象[J];古漢語研究;1991年03期

6 劉釗;《抱樸子內(nèi)篇校釋》斷句誤一例[J];古漢語研究;1994年04期

7 董玉芝;《抱樸子》復(fù)音詞構(gòu)詞方式初探[J];古漢語研究;1994年04期

8 石鋟;論疑問詞“何”的功能滲透[J];古漢語研究;1997年04期

9 王華;;解讀古漢語副詞“獨(dú)”[J];晉中學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年05期

10 段業(yè)輝;《世說新語》疑問句分析[J];南京師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1998年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李娜;《抱樸子》反義詞研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2003年

2 成妍;《抱樸子內(nèi)篇》詞匯研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2005年

3 田美;《說苑》疑問句研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2007年

4 單梅青;《抱樸子內(nèi)篇》副詞研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

5 王秀芳;《搜神記》疑問句判斷句研究[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2008年

6 王惠;《潛夫論》《風(fēng)俗通義》疑問句研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

7 黃靜;《抱樸子》助動詞研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2009年

8 胡曉娜;《抱樸子內(nèi)篇》介詞研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

9 史慧超;《世說新語》中的疑問句分析[D];北京語言大學(xué);2008年

10 徐雯雯;《論衡》疑問句研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2341103