【摘要】：《說文解字》作為我國文字學(xué)史上的奠基之作,是一部集字形、字音和字義研究的集大成之作。許慎運(yùn)用了相對(duì)靈活的訓(xùn)釋方式來實(shí)現(xiàn)訓(xùn)釋漢字的本義的目的,然而由于漢字類型的多樣和許慎在訓(xùn)釋漢字過程中所面臨的主觀和客觀的局限性,使得很多漢字并沒有達(dá)到許慎的預(yù)期目的。 本文主要對(duì)《說文》的義訓(xùn)進(jìn)行分析研究,盡可能詳細(xì)地解讀許慎在《說文》義訓(xùn)中所采用的訓(xùn)釋方式、取得的成果及其局限性,進(jìn)而繼承其訓(xùn)釋正確的部分,同時(shí)對(duì)其中不足的地方進(jìn)行探析,找出其原因,并對(duì)其錯(cuò)誤的地方進(jìn)行說明。以便為將來的字典、詞典的編纂和古書的訓(xùn)釋服務(wù)。 本文內(nèi)容主要包括以下幾個(gè)部分： 第一部分：緒論。這一部分主要介紹本文的選題來源；本文研究的目的和意義；本文所用的相關(guān)研究方法及《說文》義訓(xùn)的研究歷史及現(xiàn)狀。 第二部分：《說文》義訓(xùn)的體例研究。該部分主要對(duì)《說文》中所運(yùn)用的義訓(xùn)訓(xùn)釋方式進(jìn)行分析。包括直訓(xùn)和反義詞的訓(xùn)釋。 第三部分：《說文》義訓(xùn)的功能研究。這一部分又主要分為四個(gè)方面,即《說文》義訓(xùn)揭示漢字的本義、揭示漢字的源義、揭示漢字的引申義和揭示漢字的假借義。 第四部分：《說文》義訓(xùn)的失誤研究。這一部分主要列舉分析了《說文解字》義訓(xùn)失誤的三方面的原因,即字形分析錯(cuò)誤導(dǎo)、義訓(xùn)體例的局限性和許慎自身思想認(rèn)識(shí)的局限性。 第五部分：結(jié)語。我們應(yīng)該抱著客觀的態(tài)度去評(píng)價(jià)《說文》的義訓(xùn),這樣才能讓《說文》更好地為后人服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:Shuowenjiezi, as the foundation of the history of Chinese philology, is a masterpiece of the study of characters, sounds and meanings. Xu Shen used a relatively flexible way of explaining Chinese characters to achieve the purpose of explaining the original meaning of Chinese characters. However, due to the diversity of Chinese character types and the subjective and objective limitations that Xu Shen faces in the process of interpreting Chinese characters, So that many Chinese characters did not achieve Xu Shen's intended purpose. This article mainly analyzes and studies the righteousness training of Shuo Wen, and interprets in detail as much as possible the way of explanation adopted by Xu Shen in the righteousness training of Shuo Wen >, the results obtained and their limitations, and then inherits the correct part of his explanation. At the same time, it analyzes the shortcomings, finds out the reasons, and explains the mistakes. In order to serve future dictionaries, dictionaries compilation and the interpretation of ancient books. This paper mainly includes the following parts: the first part: introduction. This part mainly introduces the source of this topic, the purpose and significance of this study, the relevant research methods used in this paper, and the history and present situation of the study of Yi Xun in Shuo Wen. The second part: the study of the style of righteousness training. This part mainly analyzes the way of the explanation of righteousness and training used in Shuo Wen. Including direct training and antonyms interpretation. The third part: the study of the function of righteousness training. This part is mainly divided into four aspects, that is, "Shuo Wen" righteousness "to reveal the original meaning of Chinese characters, to reveal the origin of Chinese characters, to reveal the meaning of Chinese characters, and to reveal the false meaning of Chinese characters. The fourth part: the error research of the righteousness training. This part mainly enumerates and analyzes the three reasons of "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" and "Yi Xun" error, that is, the error guide of font analysis, the limitation of the style of righteousness training and the limitation of Xu Shen's own thinking and cognition. Part V: conclusion. We should take an objective attitude to evaluate the righteousness and discipline of Shuo Wen, so that we can better serve the posterity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：H13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李曉春;《說文解字》釋義淺析[J];華東冶金學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年04期

2 王應(yīng)龍;《說文》據(jù)形探義誤區(qū)舉隅[J];寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

3 豐逢奉;;“義界”理論與詞典編纂[J];辭書研究;1989年03期

4 關(guān)俊紅;;“由反知正”釋義法探析[J];辭書研究;2008年04期

5 陳琪宏;略說《說文解字》的釋義方式[J];池州師專學(xué)報(bào);1995年02期

6 任連明;;《說文解字》頭部名稱形聲字本義與源義關(guān)系舉隅[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

7 白兆麟;詞義引申及引申推義[J];古漢語研究;1991年04期

8 劉曉南;論《說文》釋義部分之本字復(fù)出現(xiàn)象[J];古漢語研究;1993年03期

9 楊榮祥;《說文》中的“否定訓(xùn)釋法”[J];古漢語研究;1994年03期

10 鐘明立;《說文解字》的同義詞及其辨析[J];貴州文史叢刊;1999年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2331048