【摘要】：世界逐漸成為地球村，個(gè)體逐漸成為世界公民。然而，每一個(gè)人都有他/她自身的文化背景，在理解并接受來(lái)自其他種族、文化背景的人的過(guò)程中，跨文化交際能力的重要性十分突出。因此，反復(fù)驗(yàn)證科學(xué)合理的評(píng)價(jià)方法以對(duì)跨文化交際能力進(jìn)行測(cè)評(píng)顯得尤為重要。本文有三個(gè)研究目的：一是應(yīng)用Lily A.Arasaratnam的評(píng)價(jià)方法，對(duì)經(jīng)歷跨文化交際的人們進(jìn)行跨文化交際能力的測(cè)評(píng)，，二是檢驗(yàn)該測(cè)評(píng)方法的有效性和可靠性，三是在實(shí)際測(cè)試中完善該測(cè)評(píng)方法，進(jìn)一步消弭各分項(xiàng)的可能出現(xiàn)的歧義與理解區(qū)別。 本文受試者是120名日本名古屋大學(xué)的國(guó)際留學(xué)生。本文作者使用Lily A.Arasaratnam的跨文化交際能力測(cè)評(píng)方法，調(diào)查了他們的跨文化交際能力及相關(guān)影響因素的情況。同受試的國(guó)際留學(xué)生進(jìn)行訪談，了解國(guó)際留學(xué)生對(duì)于該測(cè)評(píng)量表的各個(gè)分項(xiàng)的看法。作者通過(guò)問(wèn)卷回收數(shù)據(jù)，運(yùn)用描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)展示留學(xué)生跨文化交際能力和跨文化交際能力影響因素的情況。應(yīng)用SPSS軟件，對(duì)相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了信度分析和因子分析以檢驗(yàn)問(wèn)卷的信度和結(jié)構(gòu)效度。作者還通過(guò)問(wèn)卷訪談，找出并分析各分項(xiàng)的歧義問(wèn)題。 研究結(jié)果表明1）Lily A. Arasaratnam的跨文化交際能力測(cè)評(píng)方法很好的反應(yīng)了日本文化背景下國(guó)際留學(xué)生跨文化交際能力的現(xiàn)狀。2）該測(cè)評(píng)量表具較高的有效性和可靠性。3）該測(cè)試量表中存在一些項(xiàng)目歧義。通過(guò)項(xiàng)目分析，各個(gè)歧義問(wèn)題得到了解決，使得該測(cè)評(píng)方法得到完善。 本文研究結(jié)果的啟示是一個(gè)成熟的跨文化交際能力測(cè)評(píng)方法需要進(jìn)行反復(fù)的測(cè)試驗(yàn)證。各個(gè)分項(xiàng)的歧義問(wèn)題在反復(fù)的測(cè)試分析當(dāng)中會(huì)暴露出來(lái)，消弭了這些歧義問(wèn)題，測(cè)評(píng)方法才能更完善，跨文化交際能力的相關(guān)研究結(jié)果才會(huì)更準(zhǔn)確。
[Abstract]:The world has gradually become a global village, and the individual has gradually become a citizen of the world. However, each person has his or her own cultural background, in the process of understanding and accepting people from other races and cultural backgrounds, the importance of intercultural communication ability is very prominent. Therefore, it is particularly important to repeatedly verify scientific and reasonable evaluation methods to evaluate intercultural communicative competence. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the intercultural communicative competence of people who have experienced cross-cultural communication by using Lily A.Arasaratnam 's evaluation method, and to test the validity and reliability of the evaluation method. Third, improve the evaluation method in the actual test, and further eliminate the possible ambiguity and understanding of the sub-items. The subjects are 120 international students from Nagoya University in Japan. Using Lily A.Arasaratnam 's cross-cultural communicative competence test, the author investigates their cross-cultural communicative competence and its related influencing factors. The international students were interviewed to find out their views on each item of the scale. The author collected data from the questionnaire and used descriptive statistics to show the influence factors of cross-cultural communicative competence and cross-cultural communicative competence of foreign students. Reliability analysis and factor analysis were carried out to test the reliability and structural validity of the questionnaire with SPSS software. The author also finds out and analyzes the ambiguity of each item by questionnaire interview. The results show that 1) Lily A. Arasaratnam's cross-cultural communicative competence evaluation method reflects the current situation of international students' intercultural communicative competence in Japanese cultural background. 2) the scale is highly effective and reliable. Sex. 3) there are some items ambiguity in the scale. Through project analysis, various ambiguity problems have been solved, which makes the evaluation method perfect. The implication of this study is that a mature method of measuring intercultural communicative competence needs to be tested and verified repeatedly. The ambiguity problem of each item will be exposed in the repeated test and analysis, which will eliminate these ambiguity problems, the evaluation method can be more perfect, and the relevant research results of cross-cultural communicative competence will be more accurate.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H09

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 胡超;“天人合一”觀與跨文化交際[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2001年12期

2 張殿玉;英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)策略與自主學(xué)習(xí)[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2005年01期

3 高一虹;跨文化交際能力的培養(yǎng):“跨越”與“超越”[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2002年10期

4 彭世勇;國(guó)際跨文化交際主流研究中常用的定量數(shù)據(jù)分析方法[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2005年04期

5 許力生;跨文化的交際能力問(wèn)題探討[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2000年07期

6 楊盈;莊恩平;;構(gòu)建外語(yǔ)教學(xué)跨文化交際能力框架[J];外語(yǔ)界;2007年04期

7 高永晨;;大學(xué)生跨文化交際能力的現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查和對(duì)策研究[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2006年11期

8 鐘華!430074,樊葳葳!430074;非英語(yǔ)專業(yè)大學(xué)生的跨文化交際能力培養(yǎng)[J];外語(yǔ)界;2000年02期

9 王惠昭;以學(xué)生為中心的主題教學(xué)模式與交際能力培養(yǎng)[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2001年04期

本文編號(hào)：2310663