【摘要】：《毛詩正義》是孔穎達主撰的《五經(jīng)正義》之一，作為唐代以前《詩經(jīng)》研究的總結(jié)性著作，其中蘊涵著豐富的語言學(xué)材料，對其進行挖掘和整理對于中國語言學(xué)史的研究是大有裨益的。本文即以《毛詩正義》為主要研究材料，綜合運用訓(xùn)詁學(xué)、音韻學(xué)、詞匯學(xué)、文字學(xué)、語法學(xué)、修辭學(xué)等學(xué)科的理論，深入探討分析了《毛詩正義》所蘊含的語言觀念，全文分六個部分進行論述： 緒論部分對《毛詩正義》的語言研究現(xiàn)狀作了簡要介紹，同時闡述了本選題的研究意義。 第一章介紹了毛詩正義的成書及體例，并從總體上概括了《毛詩正義》的注疏原則，這些原則貫穿于整部書，賦予了《毛詩正義》融貫通博的特征。 第二章是《毛詩正義》語言觀研究的核心，從詞匯觀入手，主要從四個方面、三種方法、兩種方式、兩個角度來進行分析，訓(xùn)釋詞義的內(nèi)容主要有：進而申述毛傳、鄭箋，探求“得名之由”，以今語釋古語，以方俗證通語，區(qū)分“一詞多義”；探求詞義的方法主要有：形訓(xùn)、聲訓(xùn)、義訓(xùn)等；詞義演變的方式主要有：引申、連類取義；辨析同義詞分為：對文、散文，“同”中“析”異，以展示詞義之間異中有同、同中見異的關(guān)系。 第三章集中展示了《毛詩正義》在語法觀念上的成就，，既表現(xiàn)在對詞類的認(rèn)識上，也反映在對句法的推敲上，也體現(xiàn)在對“文勢”的重視上。首先孔氏以“為義”、“不為義”為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)區(qū)分了實詞和虛詞，其次從語序和省略成分上挖掘出一定的句法觀念，還自覺地結(jié)合著“文勢”來闡釋經(jīng)義。 第四章透過《毛詩正義》中的修辭現(xiàn)象和理論，進一步探討了其對幾類修辭格和“比興”理論的認(rèn)識。 結(jié)語部分歸納出孔穎達在《毛詩正義》中所反映出的語言思想，確立了其在中國語言研究史上的學(xué)術(shù)地位。
[Abstract]:"Justice in Mao Poetry" is one of the "Justice of the five Classics" written by Kong Ying-da. As a summative work on the study of the Book of songs before the Tang Dynasty, it contains rich linguistic materials. It is of great benefit to the study of Chinese linguistic history to excavate and organize it. Based on the theory of exegetics, phonology, lexicology, philology, rhetoric and so on, this paper makes a thorough analysis of the linguistic concepts contained in Mao Poetry Justice. The full text is divided into six parts: the introduction briefly introduces the present situation of the language research in Mao Poetry Justice, and expounds the significance of the research on this topic. The first chapter introduces the book and style of the justice of Mao poetry, and generalizes the principle of "justice of Mao poetry", which runs through the whole book and endows the character of "justice of Mao poem". The second chapter is the core of the study of "Mao Poetry Justice" language view, from the perspective of vocabulary, mainly from four aspects, three methods, two ways, two angles to analyze, the main content of explaining the meaning of words are: then explain Mao Zhuan, Zheng Jian, In order to find out the reason of getting the name, to interpret the ancient language with the present language, to distinguish the polysemy of the word from the common language, to find the meaning of the word, the main methods are: form training, sound training, meaning training and so on, the way of word meaning evolvement mainly includes: extension, even category taking meaning; The synonyms can be divided into two parts: text, prose, "same" and "same" in order to show the relationship between the meaning of different and the same. The third chapter focuses on the achievements in the grammatical concept of Mao's Poems Justice, which are reflected in the understanding of parts of speech, in the examination of syntax, and in the emphasis on Wen Shi. Firstly, Kong distinguishes between notional words and function words according to the criteria of "meaning" and "non-righteousness". Secondly, he excavates certain syntactic concepts from word order and ellipsis, and consciously interprets the meaning of the scripture by combining "text potential". In Chapter four, through the rhetoric phenomenon and theory in Mao Poetry Justice, the author further discusses his understanding of several kinds of rhetorical devices and the theory of "Bi Xing". The conclusion concludes the linguistic thoughts reflected by Kong Ying-da in Mao's Poems and establishes his academic status in the history of Chinese language research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：I207.22;H109.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 孫雪萍;;論孔穎達對魏晉南北朝《詩經(jīng)》學(xué)的整合[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2008年03期

2 吳福祥;《毛傳》的詞義辨析[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1990年01期

3 楊云香;;《尚書正義》反映的詞匯觀探索[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期

4 喬東義;;孔穎達的互文修辭觀發(fā)微[J];修辭學(xué)習(xí);2007年01期

本文編號：2229860