本文選題：約翰·塞爾 + 言語行為��； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：語言哲學(xué)內(nèi)部的二度轉(zhuǎn)向?yàn)楦鞣N哲學(xué)討論提供了一個(gè)全新的語用學(xué)方案。塞爾的言語行為理論就是這次語用學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向中的典型代表。論文探討的是塞爾的言語行為理論：按照塞爾的思路,分析言語行為的結(jié)構(gòu)F(p)；探索言語行為理論中的意義問題。在此基礎(chǔ)上,論文旨在考察續(xù)寫言語行為理論的可能性,以及初步討論塞爾言語行為理論對(duì)語言哲學(xué)研究,尤其是對(duì)漢語研究的意義,為如何把漢語結(jié)合到言語行為理論的研究中的嘗試邁出第一步。 就對(duì)言語行為的構(gòu)成分析而言,言語行為是一個(gè)命題-行事的雙重結(jié)構(gòu),因此,論文將分別考察以言行事力量F和命題內(nèi)容p。發(fā)現(xiàn)語言有以言行事的力量,并且對(duì)以言行事力量加以系統(tǒng)闡述,是言語行為理論區(qū)別于其他語言哲學(xué)理論的一個(gè)重要特點(diǎn)。可以說,對(duì)以言行事力量的探索開墾了語言哲學(xué)研究的新土地。相較之下,對(duì)命題的討論則幾乎充滿了整部語言哲學(xué)史。對(duì)于命題的考察,塞爾從只由主語和謂詞構(gòu)成的簡單形式的命題著手。因此,分別探討指稱問題和謂詞問題也是必要的。論文將對(duì)語言哲學(xué)史上指稱理論和謂詞理論的典型方案進(jìn)行簡要探討,接著討論塞爾如何吸取這些方案的優(yōu)勢(shì),修正這些方案的不足,從而從言語行為理論角度對(duì)這些語言哲學(xué)問題進(jìn)行回應(yīng)。 就探索言語行為理論的意義問題而言,論文主要旨在論述塞爾對(duì)意義問題的獨(dú)特見解。塞爾把“意向性”和“語境”、“慣例”等概念引入意義問題的探討中。在很多哲學(xué)家看來,以“意向性”為關(guān)鍵詞的意向主義和以“社會(huì)習(xí)俗”、“語境”為關(guān)鍵詞的主體間性理論是相互沖突的。而塞爾卻在討論意義問題的過程中,把這些概念結(jié)合在一起。論文將按照塞爾的觀點(diǎn),討論結(jié)合了“意向性”和“語境”的意義概念。 并且,塞爾區(qū)分了“字面意義”和“說話人意義”,用這一區(qū)分來解決言語行為理論中的各種問題：間接言語行為問題、反諷問題、小說話語問題、隱喻問題的處理都與這一區(qū)分有關(guān)。因此,論文還將探討塞爾如何應(yīng)用他的意義概念來解決言語行為理論中的具體問題�，F(xiàn)在有一些學(xué)者關(guān)注于對(duì)塞爾的言語行為理論的續(xù)寫,其中有一種思路是從小說話語的討論入手來考察言語活動(dòng)的。論文也試圖探索續(xù)寫塞爾言語行為理論的新路徑,因此將重點(diǎn)討論小說話語以外的另兩條途徑：間接言語行為和隱喻。 論文的另一要旨是考察把漢語納入塞爾言語行為理論的可能性。漢語具有高語境化、低形式化的特點(diǎn),十分適合間接言語行為和隱喻的研究。這兩個(gè)主題的討論在漢語中可以找到豐富的資源。但塞爾言語行為理論中一些形式化的研究方式和漢語研究又格格不入。塞爾試圖建立起一個(gè)對(duì)各種語言都普遍適用的語言哲學(xué),如果他成功了,他的言語行為理論也應(yīng)當(dāng)適用于漢語。實(shí)際情況究竟如何?當(dāng)漢語出現(xiàn)在塞爾的言語行為理論中,究竟是對(duì)這個(gè)理論的豐富發(fā)展,還是迎頭一擊,這是一個(gè)耐人尋味的問題。
[Abstract]:The two degree turn within the philosophy of language provides a new pragmatic approach to various philosophical discussions. Searl's speech act theory is a typical representative of the turn of pragmatics. The thesis discusses Searl's theory of speech act: according to Searl's thought, the structure of speech acts (P) is analyzed, and the theory of speech act is explored. On the basis of this, the thesis aims to examine the possibility of the continuation of the theory of speech act, and to discuss the first step of the study of Searl's speech act theory to the study of language philosophy, especially the significance of the study of Chinese, and the attempt to combine Chinese with the theory of speech act.
As far as the analysis of the composition of speech acts is concerned, speech act is a dual structure of propositional and acting. Therefore, the paper will examine the force that the language has to do with the power of F and P. of propositional content, and to systematically elaborate on the strength of the speech, which is the difference between the theory of speech act and other linguistic philosophical theories. In comparison, the discussion of the proposition is almost full of the history of the whole language philosophy. For the investigation of the propositions, Searl begins with a simple form of subject and predicate. Therefore, the question of reference and the question of predicate are discussed respectively. The thesis will also be necessary. The paper will briefly discuss the typical scheme of the referential theory and the predicate theory in the history of language philosophy, and then discuss how Searl absorbs the advantages of these schemes and revises the shortcomings of these schemes, so as to respond to these language philosophies from the angle of speech act theory.
In terms of the significance of the exploration of the theory of speech act, the main purpose of this thesis is to discuss Searl's unique views on the issue of meaning. Searl introduces the concept of "intentionality" and "context" and "practice" into the discussion of meaning. In the view of many philosophers, the intention to be the key word and "social custom", The intersubjectivity theory of "context" as a key word is conflicting. But Searl combines these concepts in the process of discussing meaning. The thesis will discuss the meaning concept of "intentionality" and "context" according to Searl's point of view.
In addition, Searl distinguishes "literal meaning" and "speaker meaning", using this distinction to solve various problems in the theory of speech act: indirect speech act, irony, novel discourse, and metaphorical problem dealing with this distinction. Therefore, the article will also discuss how Searl uses his meaning concept to solve the problem. There are some scholars who pay attention to the continuation of Searl's theory of speech act. One way of thinking is to explore speech activities from the discussion of the discourse of fiction. The thesis also tries to explore the new path to renew Searl's speech act theory, so it will focus on the other other than the discourse of the novel. The two way: indirect speech act and metaphor.
Another point of this paper is to examine the possibility of integrating Chinese into Searl's theory of speech act. The Chinese language is highly contextualized and characterized by low formalization. It is very suitable for the study of indirect speech acts and metaphors. The discussion of these two topics can find rich resources in Chinese. However, some formalized researchers in Searl's speech act theory The study of Chinese and Chinese is incompatible. Searl tries to establish a philosophy of language that is universally applicable to all languages. If he succeeds, his speech act theory should also be applied to Chinese. What is the actual situation? When Chinese appears in Searl's theory of speech act, it is a rich development of this theory, or is it welcome. The first strike, this is a very interesting question.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H0-05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陸揚(yáng);;德里達(dá)與塞爾[J];哲學(xué)研究;2006年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：2089768