本文選題：韓漢對比 + 空間維度詞　； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：認(rèn)知語言學(xué)認(rèn)為,從語義和語法上來說,空間表達(dá)比其他非空間表達(dá)更為基本’,空間范疇是語言中表達(dá)其他很多關(guān)系范疇的基礎(chǔ)�？臻g維度形容詞具有[+空間][+實(shí)體][+形狀][+方向][+延伸]語義特征,與其他空間詞語相比,其語義上的隱喻、轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象、構(gòu)詞方式以及句法特征都有著特殊之處。其特殊語義和用法在第二語言教學(xué)中也是難點(diǎn)之一。 本文以具有[+零維][+一維][+二維][+三維]特征的七組十四個(gè)韓漢空間維度形容詞——“大/小”、“長/短”、“高/低”、“深/淺”、“寬/窄”、“厚/薄”、“粗/細(xì)”為研究對象,運(yùn)用認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的相關(guān)理論和方法進(jìn)行了全面系統(tǒng)的分析,窮盡描寫了韓漢空間維度詞所包含的具體義項(xiàng),概括分析它們之間存在的隱喻與轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象的異同以及隱喻與轉(zhuǎn)喻路徑的異同,對稱與不對稱現(xiàn)象,在二語習(xí)得中的一些制約因素。 本文共分八個(gè)部分：第一部分是緒論,介紹本文的選題意義、理論基礎(chǔ)、研究方法及前人研究概況。第二部分界定韓漢空間維度的外延和內(nèi)涵,對韓漢空間維度詞進(jìn)行語義分析。第三部分、第四部分、第五部分、第六部分對七組韓漢空間維度詞進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的分析,系統(tǒng)地探討韓漢空間維度詞的基本義、轉(zhuǎn)喻義和隱喻義的異同,進(jìn)而考察了韓漢空間維度詞對稱與不對稱問題。第七部分對韓漢空間維度詞的二語習(xí)得情況以及現(xiàn)行教材情況進(jìn)行分析比較。第八部分是結(jié)論。 本文對韓漢空間維度詞的語義進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的分析,通過細(xì)化其基本義的語義特征,揭示了基本義到轉(zhuǎn)喻義、基本義到隱喻義、轉(zhuǎn)喻義到隱喻義的語義擴(kuò)展路徑；對韓漢空間維度詞的對稱與不對稱現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行了全面的描寫,并對其進(jìn)行了合理的解釋；以提高二語習(xí)得為主要目的對現(xiàn)行教材以及韓漢空間維度詞習(xí)得序列進(jìn)行了比較分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了教材教學(xué)建議。 本文對韓漢空間維度詞進(jìn)行全面而系統(tǒng)性的分析,彌補(bǔ)了相關(guān)研究的欠缺并為空間維度詞的類型學(xué)研究提供了參考,而且在語義、構(gòu)詞、句法上的研究成果為現(xiàn)行教學(xué)提供了理論依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Cognitive linguistics holds that spatial expression is more basic than other non spatial expressions in semantic and grammatical terms. Space category is the basis for the expression of many other relationships in language. Spatial dimension adjectives have the semantic features of [+ space] [+ entity] [+ shape] [+ direction] [+ extension], and their semantic implicit comparison with other spatial words. Metaphor, metonymy, word formation and syntactic features have their own characteristics. Their special semantics and usage are also difficult points in second language teaching.
In this paper, seven groups of fourteen Korean and Han spatial adjectives with [+ zero dimension] [+ 1] [+ 2-D] [+ 3] (+ D), "big / small", "long / short", "high / low", "deep / shallow", "wide / narrow", "thick / thin", "thick / thin" as the research object, were analyzed comprehensively and systematically by the related theories and methods of cognitive linguistics. The exhaustive description of the specific meanings contained in the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties, generalizes the similarities and differences of metaphor and metonymy between them, the similarities and differences of metaphor and metonymy path, symmetry and asymmetry, and some restrictive factors in the acquisition of two language.
This article is divided into eight parts: the first part is the introduction, which introduces the significance of the topic, the theoretical basis, the research method and the previous research. The second part defines the extension and connotation of the spatial dimension of Han and Han Dynasties, and the semantic analysis of the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties. The third part, fourth parts, fifth parts, and the sixth part of the seven groups of Korean and Han space dimensions. This paper makes a detailed analysis of the basic meaning of the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties, the similarities and differences between the meaning and the metaphorical meaning, and then examines the symmetry and asymmetry of the spatial dimension words in the Han and Han Dynasties. The seventh part analyzes and compares the two language acquisition of the Korean and Han spatial dimensions and the current situation of the textbooks. The eighth part is the conclusion.
This paper makes a systematic analysis of the semantic meaning of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties. Through the refinement of the semantic features of their basic meanings, it reveals the basic meaning, the basic meaning, the metaphorical meaning, the metaphorical meaning and the semantic extension path of metaphorical meaning, and the symmetry and asymmetry of the Korean and Han spatial dimension words, and the combination of them. In order to improve the two language acquisition, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the current teaching materials and the acquisition sequence of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties. On the basis of this, it puts forward the teaching suggestions of the teaching materials.
This paper makes a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties, which makes up the lack of related research and provides a reference for the study of the typology of space dimension words, and the research results in semantics, word formation and syntax provide a theoretical basis for the current teaching.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H136;H55

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖菲;“大”與“小”語法功能上的差異性[J];兵團(tuán)教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

2 王晶;;英漢“近”的空間隱喻認(rèn)知對比研究[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期

3 朱德熙;;自指和轉(zhuǎn)指——漢語名詞化標(biāo)記“的、者、所、之”的語法功能和語義功能[J];方言;1983年01期

4 孫敏慶;;俄漢語空間維度詞“大/小”隱喻義對比分析[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

5 谷曉恒,李曉云;“數(shù)詞+大+名詞”短語淺探[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2005年05期

6 吳念陽;楊艷芳;劉劍;;兒童書面語空間維度詞“高/低”隱喻域的認(rèn)知[J];集美大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2007年03期

7 王紅娟;;空間維度詞“深、淺”的認(rèn)知詮釋[J];科技信息;2006年S4期

8 任永軍,滕向農(nóng);空間維度詞“深、淺”的認(rèn)知語義分析[J];柳州師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

9 劉正光;;認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的語言觀與外語教學(xué)的基本原則[J];外語研究;2010年01期

10 段益民;從單音反義形容詞的句法失衡看聚合組合的多元對應(yīng)[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 陳家旭;英漢隱喻認(rèn)知對比研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2004年

2 陳萬會;中國學(xué)習(xí)者二語詞匯習(xí)得認(rèn)知心理研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

3 鄭Y靛，

本文編號：2035373