本文選題：韓漢對(duì)比 + 空間維度詞��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)認(rèn)為,從語(yǔ)義和語(yǔ)法上來(lái)說(shuō),空間表達(dá)比其他非空間表達(dá)更為基本’,空間范疇是語(yǔ)言中表達(dá)其他很多關(guān)系范疇的基礎(chǔ)�？臻g維度形容詞具有[+空間][+實(shí)體][+形狀][+方向][+延伸]語(yǔ)義特征,與其他空間詞語(yǔ)相比,其語(yǔ)義上的隱喻、轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象、構(gòu)詞方式以及句法特征都有著特殊之處。其特殊語(yǔ)義和用法在第二語(yǔ)言教學(xué)中也是難點(diǎn)之一。 本文以具有[+零維][+一維][+二維][+三維]特征的七組十四個(gè)韓漢空間維度形容詞——“大/小”、“長(zhǎng)/短”、“高/低”、“深/淺”、“寬/窄”、“厚/薄”、“粗/細(xì)”為研究對(duì)象,運(yùn)用認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的相關(guān)理論和方法進(jìn)行了全面系統(tǒng)的分析,窮盡描寫(xiě)了韓漢空間維度詞所包含的具體義項(xiàng),概括分析它們之間存在的隱喻與轉(zhuǎn)喻現(xiàn)象的異同以及隱喻與轉(zhuǎn)喻路徑的異同,對(duì)稱與不對(duì)稱現(xiàn)象,在二語(yǔ)習(xí)得中的一些制約因素。 本文共分八個(gè)部分：第一部分是緒論,介紹本文的選題意義、理論基礎(chǔ)、研究方法及前人研究概況。第二部分界定韓漢空間維度的外延和內(nèi)涵,對(duì)韓漢空間維度詞進(jìn)行語(yǔ)義分析。第三部分、第四部分、第五部分、第六部分對(duì)七組韓漢空間維度詞進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的分析,系統(tǒng)地探討韓漢空間維度詞的基本義、轉(zhuǎn)喻義和隱喻義的異同,進(jìn)而考察了韓漢空間維度詞對(duì)稱與不對(duì)稱問(wèn)題。第七部分對(duì)韓漢空間維度詞的二語(yǔ)習(xí)得情況以及現(xiàn)行教材情況進(jìn)行分析比較。第八部分是結(jié)論。 本文對(duì)韓漢空間維度詞的語(yǔ)義進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的分析,通過(guò)細(xì)化其基本義的語(yǔ)義特征,揭示了基本義到轉(zhuǎn)喻義、基本義到隱喻義、轉(zhuǎn)喻義到隱喻義的語(yǔ)義擴(kuò)展路徑；對(duì)韓漢空間維度詞的對(duì)稱與不對(duì)稱現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行了全面的描寫(xiě),并對(duì)其進(jìn)行了合理的解釋；以提高二語(yǔ)習(xí)得為主要目的對(duì)現(xiàn)行教材以及韓漢空間維度詞習(xí)得序列進(jìn)行了比較分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了教材教學(xué)建議。 本文對(duì)韓漢空間維度詞進(jìn)行全面而系統(tǒng)性的分析,彌補(bǔ)了相關(guān)研究的欠缺并為空間維度詞的類型學(xué)研究提供了參考,而且在語(yǔ)義、構(gòu)詞、句法上的研究成果為現(xiàn)行教學(xué)提供了理論依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Cognitive linguistics holds that spatial expression is more basic than other non spatial expressions in semantic and grammatical terms. Space category is the basis for the expression of many other relationships in language. Spatial dimension adjectives have the semantic features of [+ space] [+ entity] [+ shape] [+ direction] [+ extension], and their semantic implicit comparison with other spatial words. Metaphor, metonymy, word formation and syntactic features have their own characteristics. Their special semantics and usage are also difficult points in second language teaching.
In this paper, seven groups of fourteen Korean and Han spatial adjectives with [+ zero dimension] [+ 1] [+ 2-D] [+ 3] (+ D), "big / small", "long / short", "high / low", "deep / shallow", "wide / narrow", "thick / thin", "thick / thin" as the research object, were analyzed comprehensively and systematically by the related theories and methods of cognitive linguistics. The exhaustive description of the specific meanings contained in the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties, generalizes the similarities and differences of metaphor and metonymy between them, the similarities and differences of metaphor and metonymy path, symmetry and asymmetry, and some restrictive factors in the acquisition of two language.
This article is divided into eight parts: the first part is the introduction, which introduces the significance of the topic, the theoretical basis, the research method and the previous research. The second part defines the extension and connotation of the spatial dimension of Han and Han Dynasties, and the semantic analysis of the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties. The third part, fourth parts, fifth parts, and the sixth part of the seven groups of Korean and Han space dimensions. This paper makes a detailed analysis of the basic meaning of the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties, the similarities and differences between the meaning and the metaphorical meaning, and then examines the symmetry and asymmetry of the spatial dimension words in the Han and Han Dynasties. The seventh part analyzes and compares the two language acquisition of the Korean and Han spatial dimensions and the current situation of the textbooks. The eighth part is the conclusion.
This paper makes a systematic analysis of the semantic meaning of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties. Through the refinement of the semantic features of their basic meanings, it reveals the basic meaning, the basic meaning, the metaphorical meaning, the metaphorical meaning and the semantic extension path of metaphorical meaning, and the symmetry and asymmetry of the Korean and Han spatial dimension words, and the combination of them. In order to improve the two language acquisition, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the current teaching materials and the acquisition sequence of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties. On the basis of this, it puts forward the teaching suggestions of the teaching materials.
This paper makes a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties, which makes up the lack of related research and provides a reference for the study of the typology of space dimension words, and the research results in semantics, word formation and syntax provide a theoretical basis for the current teaching.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H136;H55

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖菲;“大”與“小”語(yǔ)法功能上的差異性[J];兵團(tuán)教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

2 王晶;;英漢“近”的空間隱喻認(rèn)知對(duì)比研究[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

3 朱德熙;;自指和轉(zhuǎn)指——漢語(yǔ)名詞化標(biāo)記“的、者、所、之”的語(yǔ)法功能和語(yǔ)義功能[J];方言;1983年01期

4 孫敏慶;;俄漢語(yǔ)空間維度詞“大/小”隱喻義對(duì)比分析[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

5 谷曉恒,李曉云;“數(shù)詞+大+名詞”短語(yǔ)淺探[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2005年05期

6 吳念陽(yáng);楊艷芳;劉劍;;兒童書(shū)面語(yǔ)空間維度詞“高/低”隱喻域的認(rèn)知[J];集美大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2007年03期

7 王紅娟;;空間維度詞“深、淺”的認(rèn)知詮釋[J];科技信息;2006年S4期

8 任永軍,滕向農(nóng);空間維度詞“深、淺”的認(rèn)知語(yǔ)義分析[J];柳州師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

9 劉正光;;認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的語(yǔ)言觀與外語(yǔ)教學(xué)的基本原則[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2010年01期

10 段益民;從單音反義形容詞的句法失衡看聚合組合的多元對(duì)應(yīng)[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 陳家旭;英漢隱喻認(rèn)知對(duì)比研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2004年

2 陳萬(wàn)會(huì);中國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)者二語(yǔ)詞匯習(xí)得認(rèn)知心理研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

3 鄭Y靛，

本文編號(hào)：2035373