本文選題：《廣雅疏證》 + 聯(lián)綿詞�。� 參考：《浙江師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以《廣雅疏證》中的聯(lián)綿詞及王念孫的疏證材料為研究對象,從四個方面加以研究。不包括緒論和總結,本文共分為五個部分。 第一部分先回顧了古代文獻中與聯(lián)綿詞相關的術語及其所指,了解到傳統(tǒng)的關于聯(lián)綿詞的觀念與現(xiàn)代的認識是不同的；然后對現(xiàn)代學術界給聯(lián)綿詞所下的一些代表性定義加以綜述,認識到聯(lián)綿詞是雙音節(jié)單純詞的學術界基本看法,并且引述了近些年在聯(lián)綿詞界定問題上的一些成果；最后以描述性的語言,對聯(lián)綿詞作一個界定。 第二部分先用定性和定量兩個角度對《廣雅疏證》中的聯(lián)綿詞進行了窮盡性的調(diào)查與統(tǒng)計,并考查了其文獻來源；然后從補充《廣雅》脫漏與糾正《廣雅》訛誤兩個方而對《廣雅疏證》關于《廣雅》聯(lián)綿詞的�？鼻闆r予以統(tǒng)計說明。 第三部分從《廣雅疏證》有關聯(lián)綿詞的疏證材料出發(fā),重點探討了古代聯(lián)綿詞的三大來源：同義復合詞、單音節(jié)詞、天然的聯(lián)綿詞；在這三者的基礎上發(fā)現(xiàn)了聯(lián)綿詞與單音節(jié)詞聲近義通現(xiàn)象,并對這種現(xiàn)象作了具體探討與分析,尤其是對可能來源于上古復輔音聲母的聯(lián)綿詞作了重點的分析研究。 第四部分共分四節(jié),前三節(jié)主要舉例介紹了王念孫在《廣雅疏證》中訓釋聯(lián)綿詞時所采用的三種方法,它們分別是：以聲音為線索疏證聯(lián)綿詞、辨明文字異體以疏證聯(lián)綿詞和通過類比手法疏證聯(lián)綿詞；第四節(jié)則分析了《廣雅疏證》在聯(lián)綿詞訓釋方法上所做出的貢獻及其不足。 第五部分簡略地對《廣雅疏證》在聯(lián)綿詞校詁過程中的相關問題進行研究,主要包括兩個方面：其一是從三個方而舉例介紹了王念孫在校詁聯(lián)綿詞過程中對前人之說的糾正,其二則是舉例略談我們在研習《廣雅疏證》過程中發(fā)現(xiàn)的兩個校詁問題。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the Lianmianci in Guangya and Wang Niansun are studied from four aspects. Not including the introduction and summary, this paper is divided into five parts. The first part reviews the terms related to Lianmiao ci in the ancient literature, and finds out that the traditional concept of Lianmiao ci is different from the modern understanding. Then it summarizes some representative definitions of Lianmianci in the modern academic circles, and recognizes that it is the basic view of the academic circles of disyllabic simple words, and cites some achievements on the definition of Lianmianzi in recent years. In the second part, the author makes an exhaustive investigation and statistics on the Lianxianzi in Guang Ya Shu Zheng (Guang Ya Shu) by qualitative and quantitative analysis, and examines its source of literature. Then, from the two sides of supplementing "Guangya" and correcting "Guangya" error, the author gives a statistical explanation on the collation of "Guangya" and "Guangya". The third part starts from the "Guangya" and "Guangya". In this paper, three major sources of synonymous compound words, monosyllabic words and natural conjunctive words are discussed, and on the basis of these three kinds of words, the phenomenon of synonymous words and monosyllabic words is found, and this phenomenon is discussed and analyzed in detail. The fourth part is divided into four sections. The first three sections mainly introduce the three methods used in Wang Niansun's interpretation of the consonant ci in Guang Ya Shu Zheng. They are as follows: the sound is the clue to the synonym, the second is to distinguish the characters, the other is the synonym, and the analogies are used to the synonym; In the fourth section, we analyze the contribution and deficiency of Guangya Shuzheng in the explanation method of Lianmian ci. In the fifth part, we briefly study the related problems in the process of Lianmian ci. It mainly includes two aspects: the first is to introduce Wang Niansun's correction of the former's theory in the process of combining the words in the school from three sides, and the other is to give an example about two problems found in the course of our study of Guangya and Shuzheng.
【學位授予單位】：浙江師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H131.4

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 李福言;;近三十年《廣雅疏證》研究述論[J];湖北文理學院學報;2013年09期

，

本文編號：1992156