本文選題：朱熹　切入點(diǎn)：《論語(yǔ)集注》　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：《論語(yǔ)》從東漢起列入儒家經(jīng)典，到南宋朱熹集注后成為“四書”之一，是士子必讀典籍之一。朱熹對(duì)《論語(yǔ)》相當(dāng)重視，《論語(yǔ)集注》以義理之學(xué)發(fā)揮闡釋儒家經(jīng)典，是元明以后科舉取士的指定教材，被奉為《論語(yǔ)》研究之圭臬。 本文緒論部分簡(jiǎn)單介紹了《論語(yǔ)》成書及流傳、本文選題依據(jù)及《論語(yǔ)集注》的研究現(xiàn)狀。正文部分共分四章。 第一章概述朱熹經(jīng)學(xué)及其成就，說明本文的研究意義和方法。朱熹經(jīng)學(xué)在思想上再度確立道統(tǒng)，把章句訓(xùn)詁和義理之學(xué)結(jié)合起來，以四書義理之學(xué)取代六經(jīng)訓(xùn)詁之學(xué)，并使儒學(xué)學(xué)說世俗化。 第二章從音義、�？�、義理三個(gè)角度詳細(xì)探討了朱熹《論語(yǔ)集注》的訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容。本章以音義為主要內(nèi)容，分審訂音讀、訓(xùn)釋語(yǔ)詞、串講句意、分析句讀、說明語(yǔ)法、說明修辭、概括章旨、考證名物典制八部分。朱熹訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容博廣全面，又細(xì)密精微。他注重對(duì)經(jīng)典原文和傳文的考證。朱熹在�？笨甲C方面主要是校訂訛誤、說明異文、校正衍文、補(bǔ)綴脫文。 第三章從訓(xùn)詁格式、訓(xùn)詁方法、注點(diǎn)選擇、注釋特點(diǎn)四個(gè)方面將朱熹集注與鄭玄等人的注釋進(jìn)行比較，揭示朱熹訓(xùn)詁的風(fēng)格。朱熹訓(xùn)詁形式嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，呈現(xiàn)“正音讀—通訓(xùn)詁—闡文意—發(fā)義理”的模式。其訓(xùn)詁方法以義訓(xùn)為主，通過直訓(xùn)、辨析、概說、義界，細(xì)致地揭示出詞句的具體含義。除了疏通經(jīng)典文義，朱熹更多是為發(fā)揮理學(xué)宣講，這是他區(qū)別于漢唐古注最顯著的特點(diǎn)。從注釋的格式、方法和注點(diǎn)的選擇，歸納出朱熹訓(xùn)詁的風(fēng)格：以“理”為本，訓(xùn)釋詞義以得“理”為目的，，繼承今文經(jīng)學(xué)又雜糅古文長(zhǎng)于訓(xùn)詁的特色，注重理學(xué)宣講。 第四章則從朱熹《論語(yǔ)集注》看其理學(xué)思想，從本體論、心性論、格物致知論三個(gè)類別進(jìn)行詮釋。朱熹將理氣這一對(duì)概念的關(guān)系穿插在《論語(yǔ)集注》中，認(rèn)為理主氣、理生氣、理在氣先、理一分殊，提出心兼性情、心統(tǒng)性情，提倡從人的心性之中發(fā)掘成人之道，“理欲說”強(qiáng)調(diào)內(nèi)在純粹道德意志的自律，“格物致知”提出了系統(tǒng)有效的道德修養(yǎng)方法。
[Abstract]:The Analects of Confucius was included in the Confucian Classics from the Eastern Han Dynasty and became one of the "four Books" after Zhu Xi collected notes in the Southern Song Dynasty.Zhu Xi attached great importance to the Analects of Confucius, the Analects of Analects of Confucius to explain the Confucian classics with the theory of justice, is the imperial examination after the Yuan and Ming Dynasty, the designated teaching materials, is regarded as the Analects of Confucius study.The introduction of this paper briefly introduces the writing and circulation of Analects of Confucius, the basis of this paper and the research status of Analects of Analects.The text is divided into four chapters.The first chapter summarizes Zhu Xi's Confucian classics and its achievements, and explains the significance and methods of this paper.Zhu Xi reestablished Taoism ideologically, combined the study of Zhang sentence exegesis with the study of righteousness and theory, replaced the study of six classics exegesis with the study of four books, and secularized Confucianism.The second chapter discusses the exegetical contents of Zhu Xi's Analects of Analects from three angles: phonetic meaning, collation and theory.The main content of this chapter is phonetics, reading, explaining words, stringing sentences, reading analytical sentences, explaining grammar, explaining rhetoric, generalizing the tenor of Zhang, and verifying the system of famous things.Zhu Xi exegesis content broad and comprehensive, and meticulous and subtle.He focuses on textual research of the original texts and texts.Zhu Xi in collation and textual research is mainly correction error, explain foreign text, correct Yan Wen, complement off text.The third chapter compares Zhu Xi's notes with those of Zheng Xuan's from four aspects: exegesis format, exegesis method, injection point selection and annotation characteristics, and reveals the style of Zhu Xi exegesis.Zhu Xi's exegetical form is rigorous, presenting the pattern of "correct pronunciation reading-general exegesis-expounding meaning-meaning theory".Its exegetical method is mainly about righteousness training, which reveals the concrete meaning of words and sentences in detail through direct training, discrimination, generality and meaning.In addition to dredging the classical literary meaning, Zhu Xi is more to give play to the preaching of Neo-Confucianism, which is the most remarkable characteristic of his distinguishing notes from the ancient notes of Han and Tang dynasties.From the choice of annotation format, method and injection point, this paper sums up the style of Zhu Xi's exegesis: taking "reason" as the basis, explaining the meaning of the word for the purpose of "reason", inheriting the modern literary classics and combining the ancient texts with the characteristics of the exegesis, and paying attention to the preaching of the Neo-Confucianism.The fourth chapter looks at his Neo-Confucianism thoughts from Zhu Xi's Analects of Analects, and interprets them from three categories: ontology, mental nature and materialistic knowledge.The theory of reason and desire emphasizes the self-discipline of the inner pure moral will, and the method of systematic and effective moral cultivation is put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姚徽;論朱熹《論語(yǔ)集注》的特點(diǎn)及貢獻(xiàn)[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年04期

2 胡進(jìn);;試析朱熹《論語(yǔ)集注》中的訓(xùn)詁[J];安徽水利水電職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

3 朱漢民;朱熹《四書》學(xué)與儒家工夫論[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

4 陳紱;《論語(yǔ)》鄭注與朱注的比較研究[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;1996年01期

5 劉志剛;從《四書章句集注》看朱熹的訓(xùn)詁學(xué)與義理學(xué)（上）[J];廣東教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1996年01期

6 肖永明;朱熹《四書》學(xué)的治學(xué)特點(diǎn)[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

7 慶甫;;朱熹經(jīng)典解釋方法論初探[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年02期

8 周光慶;朱熹《四書》解釋方法論[J];孔子研究;2000年06期

9 匡鵬飛;《論語(yǔ)》鄭玄與朱熹解釋之比較[J];孔子研究;2001年04期

10 羅小如;朱熹《論語(yǔ)集注》與何晏《論語(yǔ)集解》之比較[J];龍巖師專學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陶有浩;朱熹的理欲思想述評(píng)[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2003年

2 屈玉麗;《論語(yǔ)》朱熹注與劉寶楠注的比較[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1696432