本文選題：言語(yǔ)行為　切入點(diǎn)：維漢大學(xué)生　出處：《新疆師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：言語(yǔ)行為研究是語(yǔ)用學(xué)研究中一塊極其重要的方面。研究言語(yǔ)行為在一方面可以揭示人類(lèi)語(yǔ)言的共性及差異性，在另一方面還能展示人類(lèi)大腦思維的整體過(guò)程。拒絕言語(yǔ)行為作為一種威脅聽(tīng)話者積極和消極面子的言語(yǔ)行為，在語(yǔ)用學(xué)研究中占據(jù)特殊地位，在過(guò)去一直是語(yǔ)用學(xué)家們研究的熱點(diǎn)。本研究以新疆師范大學(xué)維漢大學(xué)生為研究對(duì)象，以?shī)W斯丁和賽爾的言語(yǔ)行為理論及布朗和萊文森的面子理論為理論框架，采用問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法收集語(yǔ)料并加以分析。問(wèn)卷的設(shè)計(jì)參照了國(guó)外學(xué)者所采用的“語(yǔ)篇補(bǔ)全測(cè)試”模式，并根據(jù)受試對(duì)象實(shí)際受測(cè)結(jié)果對(duì)問(wèn)卷進(jìn)行了修改。本研究選取新疆師范大學(xué)在校維吾爾族和漢族大學(xué)生各200人。問(wèn)卷要求受試者根據(jù)日常生活中習(xí)慣使用的言語(yǔ)以及問(wèn)卷不同情景下所涉及到的問(wèn)題來(lái)寫(xiě)出維漢大學(xué)生各自母語(yǔ)的拒絕話語(yǔ)。作者根據(jù)問(wèn)卷調(diào)查的統(tǒng)計(jì)結(jié)果就各策略的使用頻率方面對(duì)維漢大學(xué)生拒絕策略進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析。在分析過(guò)程中，作者將對(duì)話者的社會(huì)地位等因素作為控制因素，分析新疆師范大學(xué)維漢大學(xué)生拒絕策略的相似和差異之處。 研究結(jié)果表明維漢大學(xué)生在拒絕時(shí)存在相似點(diǎn)，這些相似點(diǎn)表現(xiàn)在以下兩方面：（1）維漢大學(xué)生在拒絕策略的選擇上都傾向于間接拒絕；（2）在間接拒絕策略的選擇和使用上，維漢大學(xué)生都傾向于使用給出借口、理由和解釋說(shuō)明，表達(dá)歉意和表示感激的策略。以上相似點(diǎn)說(shuō)明維漢大學(xué)生在實(shí)施拒絕言語(yǔ)行為的過(guò)程中，都試圖減弱言后行為產(chǎn)生的效力并遵循禮貌原則以維護(hù)說(shuō)話人和聽(tīng)話人雙方積極和消極的面子。同時(shí)本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)維漢大學(xué)生在不同情境下使用拒絕策略存在個(gè)性差異，具體表現(xiàn)為維吾爾族大學(xué)生在拒絕過(guò)程中只在個(gè)別情景中使用了直接拒絕策略，而漢族大學(xué)生相比較而言在較多情景下采用了直接拒絕策略。維吾爾族大學(xué)生在使用直接拒絕策略時(shí)更為謹(jǐn)慎。 新疆高校是維吾爾族、漢族和其他少數(shù)民族大學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)生活和成長(zhǎng)交流的沃土。在日常學(xué)習(xí)生活中，，各族大學(xué)生需加深對(duì)彼此言語(yǔ)行為習(xí)慣及言語(yǔ)所承載思想文化的了解，尋求共性，以達(dá)到共同學(xué)習(xí)進(jìn)步的目的。維吾爾族和漢族大學(xué)生，作為新疆高校大學(xué)生的主體，應(yīng)更熟悉和包容彼此之間的言語(yǔ)行為習(xí)慣，成為構(gòu)建和諧穩(wěn)定大學(xué)校園環(huán)境和社會(huì)環(huán)境的中堅(jiān)力量。
[Abstract]:The study of speech acts is an extremely important aspect in pragmatics. On the one hand, the study of speech acts can reveal the commonness and difference of human language. On the other hand, it can also show the whole process of human brain thinking. As a speech act threatening the hearer's positive and negative face, refusal speech act occupies a special position in pragmatics research. This study focuses on Uighur and Han students of Xinjiang normal University, and takes Austen and Searle's speech act theory and Brown's and Levinson's face theory as the theoretical framework. The questionnaire is designed according to the model of "text complement Test" adopted by foreign scholars. The questionnaire was revised according to the actual test results of the subjects. In this study, 200 Uygur and Han students from Xinjiang normal University were selected. The questionnaire asked the subjects to use language according to their habits in daily life. According to the statistical results of the questionnaire, the author makes a study on the frequency of the strategies used by Uighur Chinese college students. In the process of analysis, Taking the social status of the interlocutor as the controlling factor, the author analyzes the similarities and differences of the rejection strategies of Uighur and Han students in Xinjiang normal University. The results show that Uyghur college students have similar points when they refuse. These similarities are shown in the following two aspects: 1) Uighur Chinese students tend to choose indirect rejection strategies in their choice of rejection strategies, and both tend to choose and use indirect rejection strategies. Uyghur college students tend to use strategies of giving excuses, reasons and explanations, expressions of apology and gratitude. Both try to weaken the effectiveness of postverbal behavior and follow the principle of politeness in order to maintain both positive and negative face of the speaker and the hearer. Meanwhile, the present study finds that there are personality differences in the use of rejection strategies in different situations among Uighur and Chinese students. The specific manifestation is that Uygur college students only use direct rejection strategy in individual situations in the process of rejection. Compared with the Han students, the students of the Han nationality adopted the direct rejection strategy in more situations, while the Uygur students were more cautious in using the direct rejection strategy. Xinjiang colleges and universities are fertile ground for Uygur, Han and other minority students to study, live and grow and communicate. In their daily study, college students of all nationalities need to deepen their understanding of each other's speech behavior habits and the ideology and culture carried by speech. Uygur and Han students, as the main body of university students in Xinjiang, should be more familiar with and tolerant of each other's speech behavior habits. Become the backbone of constructing harmonious and stable campus environment and social environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 王愛(ài)華,吳貴涼;英漢拒絕言語(yǔ)行為的社會(huì)語(yǔ)用研究[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2004年03期

2 馬月蘭;中美“拒絕”言語(yǔ)行為比較研究[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年04期

3 馬月蘭;從語(yǔ)篇表層談中、美拒絕策略[J];齊齊哈爾大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年04期

4 吳建設(shè);拒絕語(yǔ)的表達(dá)方法[J];四川外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

5 姚俊;從英漢拒絕策略的語(yǔ)用對(duì)比看中西文化差異[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2003年01期

6 裴麗霞;;英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)學(xué)生拒絕言語(yǔ)行為習(xí)得狀況調(diào)查——以非英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)學(xué)生和英語(yǔ)母語(yǔ)者為參照[J];蘇州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

7 蔡少蓮;;英漢語(yǔ)拒絕策略理論與實(shí)證研究[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2011年05期

8 顧曰國(guó);奧斯汀的言語(yǔ)行為理論:詮釋與批判[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;1989年01期

本文編號(hào)：1659569