發(fā)布時間：2018-03-15 05:00

  本文選題：現(xiàn)代漢語　切入點：名量詞隱喻　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：擁有豐富的量詞可以看作是漢語的一個重要特征,在漢語量詞中,名量詞除了限“量”的主要功能外,還擁有眾多的語用修辭功能,而隱喻是其中一項重要的語用修辭功能。認知語言學(xué)對隱喻的全新解讀為我們研究量詞提供了新的途徑,本文主要運用認知語言學(xué)的理論,尤其是隱喻與轉(zhuǎn)喻的相關(guān)理論對現(xiàn)代漢語中的名量詞隱喻現(xiàn)象進行研究。 第一章介紹了本文研究的對象與范圍、選題的目的與意義、理論背景、研究方法、語料來源。 第二章介紹了認知語言學(xué)對隱喻的全新解讀,并對轉(zhuǎn)喻機制進行了簡要的介紹,為本文的研究打下理論基礎(chǔ)。 第三章探討了現(xiàn)代漢語名量詞隱喻。我們通過將現(xiàn)代漢語中名量詞隱喻與古代漢語中的隱喻和傳統(tǒng)比喻修辭手法進行比較,歸納出現(xiàn)代漢語名量詞隱喻屬于結(jié)構(gòu)隱喻,具有抽象的特征與對上下文語境依賴程度較小等特點。經(jīng)研究我們還發(fā)現(xiàn)名量詞隱喻產(chǎn)生的前提是量詞對名詞的反制約作用,名量詞隱喻是對名量詞進行“遷嫁”使用的結(jié)果。 第四章按照認知目的與隱喻機制特點兩條標準對現(xiàn)代漢語名量詞隱喻進行了分類,按照認知目的標準筆者將現(xiàn)代漢語名量詞隱喻分為認知性名量詞隱喻與修辭性名量詞隱喻,在名量詞的適用對象范疇中,由核心區(qū)域到外圍區(qū)域的過渡過程也是由認知性名量詞隱喻向修辭性名量詞隱喻過渡的過程；按照隱喻機制特點筆者將現(xiàn)代漢語名量詞隱喻分為完整名量詞隱喻、缺省量詞隱喻、缺失名量詞隱喻與容器名量詞隱喻四類,其后的章節(jié)也圍繞著這四類來展開。 第五章主要對完整名量詞隱喻進行了研究,經(jīng)研究我們發(fā)現(xiàn)完整名量詞隱喻屬于修辭性隱喻,主要由臨時名量詞產(chǎn)生,產(chǎn)生的動因有“名十名”結(jié)構(gòu)表隱喻這一語法層面的原因,也與人們對某些表量不要求精確有關(guān)。 第六章主要對缺省名量詞隱喻進行了研究,經(jīng)研究我們發(fā)現(xiàn)缺省名量詞隱喻的源域是缺省的,主要由語義特征豐富的常規(guī)專用量詞產(chǎn)生。在沒有語境對源域進行補足的情況下,名量詞會起到中介作用,與靶域也即名量詞所修飾的對象進行互動從而對源域進行補足。 第七章主要對缺失名量詞隱喻進行了研究,經(jīng)研究我們發(fā)現(xiàn)缺失名量詞隱喻屬于認知性名量詞隱喻,是一種貧乏映射,主要由二維形狀名量詞產(chǎn)生。缺失名量詞隱喻具有對抽象名詞隱喻的能力,反映了人類的認知規(guī)律。 第八章主要對容器性名量詞隱喻進行研究,經(jīng)研究我們發(fā)現(xiàn)容器名量詞隱喻是人類的“容器”意象圖式與“主體與背景”等認知因素共同作用的結(jié)果,容器名量詞隱喻也擁有對抽象名詞的隱喻能力,是人類認知規(guī)律的反映。 第九章是對全文的總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Having abundant quantifiers can be regarded as an important feature of Chinese. In Chinese classifiers, besides the main functions of limiting "quantity", noun classifiers also have a lot of pragmatic and rhetorical functions. Metaphor is one of the important pragmatic rhetorical functions. The new interpretation of metaphor in cognitive linguistics provides a new way for us to study quantifiers. In particular, the theories of metaphor and metonymy are used to study the phenomenon of nominal-quantifier metaphor in modern Chinese. The first chapter introduces the object and scope of this paper, the purpose and significance of the topic, the theoretical background, the research methods, and the source of the corpus. Chapter two introduces the new interpretation of metaphor in cognitive linguistics and gives a brief introduction to metonymy mechanism, which lays a theoretical foundation for this study. The third chapter discusses the modern Chinese nominal-classifier metaphor. By comparing the modern Chinese nominal-classifier metaphor with the ancient Chinese metaphor and the traditional figurative rhetoric, we conclude that the modern Chinese nominal-classifier metaphor belongs to structural metaphor. It is also found that the premise of noun quantifier metaphor is the counterrestriction of quantifier to nouns, and the Numeric quantifier metaphor is the result of the use of noun quantifiers. Chapter 4th classifies modern Chinese nominal-classifier metaphors according to the characteristics of cognitive purpose and metaphorical mechanism, and classifies modern Chinese nominal-classifier metaphors into cognitive nominal-quantifier metaphors and rhetorical nominal-quantifier metaphors. In the category of applicable objects, the transition from the core region to the peripheral region is also the transition process from cognitive nominal-quantifier metaphor to rhetorical nominal-quantifier metaphor. According to the characteristics of metaphorical mechanism, the author classifies modern Chinese nominal-classifier metaphor into four categories: complete nominal-classifier metaphor, default quantifier metaphor, missing nominal-quantifier metaphor and container nominal-classifier metaphor, and the subsequent chapters also focus on these four categories. Chapter 5th mainly studies the complete nominal-classifier metaphor. We find that the complete nominal-quantifier metaphor is a rhetorical metaphor, which is mainly produced by the temporary nominal-classifier. The motivation is the grammatical level of "name ten" structural table metaphor, and it is also related to the fact that people do not require precision for some table quantities. Chapter 6th focuses on the study of default Numeric quantifier metaphor, and we find that the source domain of default Numeric quantifier metaphor is default. In the absence of the context to complement the source domain, the noun quantifier will act as an intermediary and interact with the object modified by the target field, I. E. the Noun quantifier can complement the source domain. Chapter 7th mainly studies the missing nominal-quantifier metaphor. We find that the absent nominal-quantifier metaphor is a cognitive quantifier metaphor, which is a kind of poor mapping. The missing nominal-quantifier metaphor has the ability to abstract noun metaphor, which reflects the human cognitive law. Chapter 8th mainly studies the metaphor of container classifier. We find that the metaphor of container classifier is the result of human's "container" image schema and cognitive factors such as "subject and background". Container quantifier metaphor also has the metaphorical ability to abstract nouns, which is the reflection of human cognitive law. Chapter 9th is a summary of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H15

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡金梅;;名詞作臨時物量詞的隱喻識解[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年05期

2 彭媛;;漢語“一量多名”現(xiàn)象的范疇化解析——以量詞“串”為例[J];贛南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期

3 惠紅軍;;漢語量詞超常搭配的動因分析[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期

4 孫琴;淺議量詞的修辭作用[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年07期

5 姚雙云,樊中元;漢語空間義量詞考察[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2002年06期

6 趙靜貞;數(shù)量詞“一絲”的虛用[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1983年02期

7 李燦;;臨時量詞短語的隱喻認知分析[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期

8 劉晨紅;;臨時名量詞與名詞匹配的認知機制[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

9 汪小玲;李翩;;個體量詞的產(chǎn)生及其歷史演變過程探析——以量詞“本”為例[J];欽州學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年02期

10 宗守云;;量詞范疇化的途徑和動因[J];上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

，

本文編號：1614504