本文選題：學(xué)習(xí)策略　切入點：輸入　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：從20世紀90年代開始,學(xué)習(xí)策略的研究成為語言習(xí)得研究的一個重要方面,雖然國內(nèi)外的學(xué)者對學(xué)習(xí)策略進行了多方面的研究,但還很少有人把語言技能劃分為輸入和輸出兩大類型,并對輸入與輸出學(xué)習(xí)策略進行橫向與縱向?qū)Ρ妊芯俊?本研究是在前人學(xué)習(xí)策略分類的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合對留學(xué)生的訪談,設(shè)計出針對留學(xué)生聽說讀寫四個方面學(xué)習(xí)策略使用情況的調(diào)查問卷,然后借助SPSS17.0軟件進行統(tǒng)計分析,比較留學(xué)生在漢語輸入與輸出學(xué)習(xí)策略使用上存在的異同,并且探討性別、文化背景和漢語水平等對留學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)策略使用的影響。 通過數(shù)據(jù)分析發(fā)現(xiàn),留學(xué)生在學(xué)習(xí)觀念上的得分高于管理策略和學(xué)習(xí)策略,表明留學(xué)生有比較明確的學(xué)習(xí)策略意識。聽力和口語相比,留學(xué)生更重視口語的習(xí)得,他們在口語監(jiān)控策略、計劃策略和處理障礙策略上都得分較高,但他們在口頭表達時對母語的依賴也更強,較少使用總結(jié)、吸納策略。留學(xué)生在寫作學(xué)習(xí)上沒有計劃,較少使用交流求助和總結(jié)吸納策略,對寫作不夠重視。女生比男生要注意制定計劃、總結(jié)吸納,但男生在認知策略和處理障礙上得分較高。非漢字圈的學(xué)生在交流求助、處理障礙和總結(jié)吸納策略上的得分比漢字圈的學(xué)生高,而漢字圈的學(xué)生在學(xué)習(xí)漢語時更有計劃性。初級水平的學(xué)生對學(xué)習(xí)策略的概念比較模糊,不知道如何在學(xué)習(xí)過程中使用各種策略,中級水平的學(xué)生經(jīng)過一段時間的學(xué)習(xí)和摸索,能夠在學(xué)習(xí)中經(jīng)常使用各種策略幫助理解和表達。造成這些結(jié)果可能是因為：(1)留學(xué)生在中國生活,迫切的表達需要讓他們更重視口語的習(xí)得和策略的運用。(2)寫作本身的難度讓學(xué)生對寫作產(chǎn)生畏難情緒。(3)女生的性格使她們在學(xué)習(xí)漢語時比男生計劃性更強,注意總結(jié)。(4)不同的文化背景造成非漢字圈的學(xué)生偏愛使用交流求助策略,漢字圈的學(xué)生計劃性更強。(5)漢語水平較低是造成初級水平的學(xué)生各項策略使用頻率不高的主要原因。 最后,本文根據(jù)數(shù)據(jù)分析的結(jié)果,對漢語作為第二語言的教學(xué)對策和策略培訓(xùn)提出了一些建議。
[Abstract]:Since 1990s, the study of learning strategies has become an important aspect of language acquisition. However, few people divide language skills into two types: input and output, and make a contrastive study of input and output learning strategies horizontally and vertically. Based on the classification of learning strategies and interviews with foreign students, this study designed a questionnaire on the use of learning strategies in the four aspects of listening, speaking, reading and writing for foreign students, and then made a statistical analysis with the help of SPSS17.0 software. This paper compares the differences and similarities between the Chinese input and output learning strategies used by foreign students, and probes into the influence of gender, cultural background and Chinese proficiency on the use of learning strategies for foreign students. Through data analysis, it is found that the scores of foreign students in learning concepts are higher than those in management strategies and learning strategies, which indicates that foreign students have a clear sense of learning strategies. Compared with oral English, foreign students pay more attention to the acquisition of oral English. They scored higher in oral monitoring strategies, planning strategies and coping barriers strategies, but they also relied more on their mother tongue for oral expression, using less summary and absorbing strategies. Female students pay more attention to making plans and summing up than boys, but boys have higher scores on cognitive strategies and processing obstacles. The scores of coping obstacles and summing up strategies were higher than those of Chinese circle students, while the Chinese character circle students had more planning in learning Chinese. Do not know how to use various strategies in the learning process, intermediate level students after a period of time to learn and explore, Can often use a variety of strategies in learning to help understand and express. These results may be due to the Chinese students living in China, The urgent expression needs to make them pay more attention to the acquisition of oral English and the use of strategies. (2) the difficulty of writing itself makes students feel afraid of writing. (3) female students' personality makes them more planning than boys in learning Chinese. Pay attention to summing up. 4) different cultural backgrounds result in the students of non-Chinese circle prefer to use communication help strategies, and the lower level of Chinese language is the main reason for the low frequency of using various strategies of students at primary level. Finally, according to the results of data analysis, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the teaching strategy and strategy training of Chinese as a second language.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H195

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉春燕;二語習(xí)得中的語言輸出研究[D];上海外國語大學(xué);2006年

2 吳勇毅;不同環(huán)境下的外國人漢語學(xué)習(xí)策略研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1597716